Meet Jia Yueting, China's Elon Musk - TechCentral

Meet Jia Yueting, China’s Elon Musk

Jia Yueting

Jia Yueting

Jia Yueting has all the trappings of a successful Chinese tech entrepreneur with global ambitions.

A self-made billionaire who got his start as the IT guy at his local tax bureau, Jia’s flagship Internet video company now sports a US$15bn market capitalisation and a buy rating from Goldman Sachs.

Donning hoodies and t-shirts, he boasts of plans to take on Apple in smartphones and surpass Tesla Motors in electric cars.

Jia’s Faraday Future has lured staff from Ferrari and BMW, and won the backing of Nevada’s governor to construct a $1bn auto plant in North Las Vegas — about 650km from where Tesla broke ground on a giant battery factory in 2014.

Yet for all of Jia’s accomplishments, the 43-year-old tycoon has failed to win the confidence of one key man. Dan Schwartz, Nevada’s treasurer, says he’s sceptical Jia can secure financing for the car plant, a project that needs government support for power lines, water mains and roads.

Schwartz, the former CEO of a private equity research firm in Hong Kong, wants more transparency on the funding before signing off on state bonds for $120m of infrastructure improvements.

The crux of Schwartz’s concern is Jia’s reliance on equity-backed loans, a financing strategy that could leave Nevada taxpayers vulnerable to the whims of China’s volatile stock market.

Jia has pledged 87% of his holdings in Leshi Internet Information & Technology Corp — his flagship firm — for cash that he then plowed back into his companies, regulatory filings show. The stock, which was halted in Shenzhen for the first five months of 2016, has dropped 11% since it resumed trading on 3 June, a move that heightens Schwartz’s fear that a margin call could prevent Jia from funding the plant.

“You can see where this leads,” Schwartz said in a phone interview. “His Internet company is successful, but that doesn’t generate the billions of dollars he’d need. Where’s he going to get the money?’’

The financing questions surrounding Jia’s foray into the US electric car market are becoming more common around the world as China Inc embarks on an unprecedented overseas shopping spree. The nation’s firms, which boosted outbound direct investment by 62% in January-May from a year earlier, are branching out even as rising debt levels and weak profits at home cast doubt over their ability to secure stable funding.

Financing plans

Faraday, whose 1 000-horsepower concept car has drawn comparisons to the Batmobile, says it has the full support of Nevada’s governor and is pushing forward with the city of North Las Vegas on infrastructure planning.

The 800-employee car maker — a separate company from Leshi that’s majority-owned by Jia — has sought to address Schwartz’s concerns, but could “technically” build the plant without the state bonds, Faraday spokeswoman Stacy Morris said in an e-mailed reply to questions.

Jia has invested more than $300m of his own money into Faraday and the firm will announce a round of outside funding within weeks, said Winston Cheng, a former Bank of America investment banker who now runs corporate finance for Jia’s companies. He said the size of the funding would be “meaningful” and come from Asian investors, while declining to provide more details.

Faraday Future FFZERO1 Concept

Faraday Future’s FFZERO1 Concept

“I don’t understand why he’s trying to kill these high-end jobs in California and Nevada,” Cheng said in an interview, referring to Schwartz. “It baffles me.”

City, county and regional government agencies are already working with Faraday on infrastructure for the plant, and the Nevada governor’s office of economic development has approved funding for worker training, the office said in an e-mailed response to questions from Bloomberg. Tesla — which is named, like Faraday, after a 19th century pioneer in the field of electricity — declined to comment.

Leshi, the publicly traded centrepiece of Jia’s empire, shows few signs of financial distress. Profits increased by 20% in the first quarter, while its quick ratio, a gauge of the firm’s ability to meet obligations over the coming year, is in line with the median for Chinese companies as a whole, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. Leshi’s Altman Z score, a measure of bankruptcy risk, suggests trouble is unlikely.

Analysts are bullish on the stock, with nine of 11 forecasters tracked by Bloomberg giving it the equivalent of a buy rating. Goldman Sachs issued a price target of 70,22 yuan on 22 June, or 35% above its last close. The bank declined a request to interview its Leshi analyst.

Investors are less sanguine, with Leshi shares sinking for six straight days after they resumed trading last month. At 105 times projected earnings for this year, the stock is more than twice as expensive as the median China-listed company. The firm has recorded negative cash flow for the past two quarters, data compiled by Bloomberg show. Shares slipped 0,5% at 10.03am Hong Kong time on Tuesday.

Stock loans

“It’s a matter of time before problems emerge,” said Wang Zheng, the Shanghai-based chief investment officer at Jingxi Investment Management Co, which oversees about $300m and is avoiding Leshi shares in part because of concerns over its financing strategy. The company’s high valuation reflects the appeal of “concept” stocks among Chinese individual investors, Wang said.

Jia and his family have pledged about $5bn of Leshi shares as collateral for loans, amounting to a 35% stake, according to data compiled by Bloomberg from the company’s first-quarter report.

Jia also sold 2,5bn yuan ($375m) of Leshi shares in June 2015 and lent the proceeds back to Leshi to “relieve the company’s financing pressure”. He later entered into a contract with an asset management firm to exchange 100m shares, or about 5,3% of the company, for cash that he then lent to Leshi interest-free. Jia pledged to repurchase the stake after Leshi repays the money.

“The company is capital strapped,” said Dai Ming, a money manager at Hengsheng Asset Management Co in Shanghai.

For Schwartz, Jia and Faraday Future need to explain more clearly how they plan to provide stable financing for the Nevada project. Only then would he consider supporting a state debt sale to fund the plant’s infrastructure. He said it’s his role as treasurer to bring the bond before the state’s board of finance, whose chairman is the governor, for approval.

Schwartz, an elected member of the Republican party who took office in January 2015, dismissed the notion that his opposition to the Faraday project has anything to do with his political ambitions. He has clashed with the Republican governor before on budgetary issues, according to local media, amid speculation he could mount his own bid for governor.

“I may/may not run for governor, but this project has nothing to do with my political future,” Schwartz said in an e-mail. “It’s strictly about whether Faraday has the money/expertise to build a $1bn electric car manufacturing facility in North Las Vegas. And, if they don’t, whether or not I want the Nevada taxpayer to pick up the tab.”  — (c) 2016 Bloomberg LP

  • Written with assistance from Dana Hull and Zhang Shidong

1 Comment

  1. This side of X. on

    Schwartz seems to be asking the correct questions. The Nevada people have already invested into the electric automobile industry, and have already achieved their aim of pioneering the industry within the state and it seems that the initial investment has been a very lucrative deal already, by and large, Tesla has repaid and is now providing jobs and adding value to the state. In other words the risk of taking on a fledging industry has been overcome, the results are in, and the people of Nevada can feel relieved by the outcome. Why would the people of Nevada want to take on more risk, when it is clear that they have already established that the electric automobile industry is absolutely viable. Attracting more electric car manufacturers should ultimately be a case of facilitation with regards to making land available and infrastructure which remains the property of the state but throwing in more cash into another bet when one is already paying off……? Hmmmm, Nevada gambling capital of the world, plays for the house, I think that China.Inc will have to bring in more than one whale to the table.