Musk's space dreams tested by mystery Zuma failure - TechCentral

Musk’s space dreams tested by mystery Zuma failure

It was one of the most important things Elon Musk has ever launched into space: a government satellite so shrouded in secrecy that virtually everything about it is classified.

Its code name: Zuma.

Only now, what was supposed to be a triumph for Musk and his SpaceX has turned into a potential setback after the satellite went missing. The episode is also shaping up as a test for the billionaire’s ambitions in space — especially SpaceX’s hard-won ability to compete for military missions.

“They’re concerned any failure might hinder their ability to get future national security launch contracts,” said Brian Weeden, the director of programme planning for the Secure World Foundation, a space-policy think tank. “National security payloads are a very important potential market for SpaceX.”

Details are scant and it’s far from clear who, if anyone, is at fault. But this much is certain: Zuma, perched atop a SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket, streaked across the Florida sky from Cape Canaveral on Sunday evening and the first stage returned safely to land. Cheers went up inside SpaceX Mission Control, in Hawthorne, California.

But something went wrong. By Monday evening, Zuma was presumed lost.

Gwynne Shotwell, the chief operating officer of SpaceX, issued a strongly worded statement on Tuesday that placed the blame elsewhere.

“After review of all data to date, Falcon 9 did everything correctly on Sunday night,” Shotwell said. SpaceX declined to comment further, citing the mission’s classified status, as did Northrup Grumman, which hired SpaceX as the launch contractor.

Classified missions

SpaceX’s review so far indicates that “no design, operational or other changes are needed”, Shotwell said. The company doesn’t anticipate any impact on its upcoming launch schedule, including a Falcon 9 mission in three weeks.

“There’s a long tradition of not commenting on problems with classified missions, unless it blows up in such a way that everyone can see it,” said John Logsdon, founder and former director of the Space Policy Institute at George Washington University.

“There will be at least three investigations. SpaceX will follow through to make sure they were not part of the problem,” he said. “There will be an internal investigation at Northrup Grumman. And the sponsoring agency will do an investigation. No matter what Zuma was, it was expensive. A billion dollars is not out of the ball park.”

Artist’s impression of Falcon Heavy

Whatever the cause, the mishap could scarcely come at a worse time for Musk. Just days before Sunday’s launch, his flagship public company, Telsa, once again pushed back its production target for its pivotal Model 3 sedan. The move raised questions about whether the electric-car company would need to raise cash.

Closely held SpaceX, meanwhile, is heading into what is due to be a busy year. The company has said it plans about 30 missions in 2018 after completing a record 18 last year.

SpaceX is slated to demonstrate the maiden flight of Falcon Heavy, a larger and more powerful rocket, later this month. And along with Boeing, it has a contract with Nasa to fly astronauts to the International Space Station as part of the “Commercial Crew” programme, with the first crucial test flight scheduled for the second quarter.

Zuma was SpaceX’s third military launch. The Falcon 9 won US Air Force certification for national security space missions in May 2015, breaking a lock long held by United Launch Alliance, a joint venture between Boeing and Lockheed Martin.

Contracts for military launches include satellites that let troops communicate on battlefields and are estimated to be valued at about US$70bn through to 2030.  — Reported by Dana Hull, with assistance from Tony Capaccio, (c) 2018 Bloomberg LP


  1. The mission was a success. The payload delivered successfully. The payload is classified top secret and as such it is to the benefit of the American government that the payload not be tracked.

  2. Heinrich Helmbold on

    Maybe the fault was naming the mission “Zuma”. The mission was set up to disobey any commands, laws or rational logic. I have to agree that this is not a SpaceX flaw

  3. It either failed, or they are sowing disinformation around it. One of the two. Since there are two different versions of the event from SpaceX and their government I’d say the latter is likely. Either way – Nobody knows if the satellite is really up there now… Will ever know for sure. That is the nature of these things.