As you read this article on your computer or smartphone, you are almost certainly using open-source technology in some way. It forms the foundation of the global digital economy, from operating systems and web servers to databases and encryption protocols.
While the US and Europe have led the development of open-source technology, China is championing its own alternatives. The Chinese government has made open-source development part of its national technology strategy. Chinese companies and institutions have been active in redefining how open-source technology is being developed, licensed and deployed.
China’s open-source strategy could influence products and services used by people around the world, particularly as AI becomes an everyday technology.
The success of China’s efforts may depend on building global trust, however. Chinese companies, backed by the government, have long been known to acquire advanced technology through intellectual property theft and by applying pressure in joint ventures and licensing agreements.
Open-source technology is increasingly becoming an arena of strategic competition between countries. As a China expert and open-source researcher, I believe the countries that lead the technical and legal standards governing open-source technology will gain a competitive edge for decades to come.
China’s long road to open source
The open-source movement has taken various forms, from collaborations aimed at bypassing corporate monopolies to business strategies for developing products quickly. Open-source software has allowed developers around the world to reuse and improve on shared code.
Linux, the core software powering Android phones and most of the internet, is an open-source technology. Risc-V, an emerging alternative to Intel and ARM chip designs, and next-generation mobile network interfaces are also open source.
Early Chinese engagements with open source aimed to develop technologies that were free from foreign control. A government-run software institute developed Red Flag Linux as an alternative to Microsoft’s Windows operating system, which the government saw as costly to maintain and vulnerable to foreign intelligence gathering. A Chinese military university later created Kylin, an operating system for the People’s Liberation Army and other government organisations.
In recent years, Chinese tech companies have embraced open-source technology as a way around sanctions and export controls. After the US government blacklisted the telecoms giant Huawei for its ties to the Chinese military, Google revoked the company’s access to licensed services and apps. But Huawei used Android’s open-source code to maintain its smartphone operating system. Eventually, Huawei developed an alternative called HarmonyOS Next and released its own open-source version as OpenHarmony.
Today, Chinese leader Xi Jinping is stressing the importance of science and technology independence and self-strengthening, known as keji zili ziqiang. The ministry of industry & IT and other government bodies have supported domestic platforms, such as the state-guided OpenAtom Foundation, for open-source technology, and Gitee, a Chinese alternative to GitHub, a popular repository for open-source software. Domestic open-source operating systems such as openKylin and openEuler play a key role in securing China’s IT infrastructure.
China is also positioning itself as an indispensable player in setting global standards for open-source hardware. For example, its work on Risc-V allows Chinese technology companies to reduce dependence on foreign intellectual property in semiconductors. Open hardware standards make Chinese companies less vulnerable to export controls and bans.
China’s strategy of “overtaking on a turn”, or closely following and then passing the front-runner, appears to be paying off. Chinese telecoms companies, already leaders in 5G mobile network technology, are working with an international alliance to shape 6G, the next-generation standard for mobile communications. The Open-RAN standard the alliance is developing has complex implications for cybersecurity and strategic competition.
Open-source AI: With Chinese characteristics?
The contest over AI has moved beyond export controls of AI chips towards who leads open-source AI development. Xi is expected to discuss AI with US President Donald Trump on his visit to the US in September.
Major Chinese AI models such as Qwen, DeepSeek, Kimi and GLM are generally open weight, not open source, meaning that the model software and its final parameters are made available, but not the training data and methodology. AI companies often offer models in proprietary, open-weight and smaller open-source versions.
The White House and Silicon Valley remain split over the prospects of open-source AI. Anthropic and OpenAI have accused Chinese open-weight model makers of large-scale, unauthorised distillation, a technique used to copy proprietary AI models. The Trump administration and US lawmakers have proposed restricting access to Chinese open-weight models, and some federal agencies and state governments have already moved to prohibit employees and contractors from using DeepSeek, for security reasons.
Users of Chinese AI face risks that are not widely understood. Chinese open-weight models are designed to align with government censorship and propaganda. While Chinese models are often distributed under standard licences, such as MIT and Apache 2.0, some impose additional compliance obligations.
Moonshot’s Kimi K3 model licence, for example, requires licensees exceeding specific revenue or user thresholds to “prominently” display the Kimi model name. MiniMax M3’s community licence lists uses prohibited by “applicable laws or regulations”, raising questions over which jurisdictions apply.
Bilingual licences developed under Chinese government guidance give Chinese users more access and Chinese courts more control. These include the Mulan Permissive Software Licence, version 2.0 and the OpenAtom Model Licence, version 1.0. Both are written in English and Chinese, but the Chinese version prevails in cases of conflicting interpretation, especially in Chinese jurisdictions.
Open-source technology has always been global
The US regulates AI through a patchwork of federal and state laws. Internationally recognised frameworks may offer a better approach to governing open-source AI. Examples include the EU’s Artificial Intelligence Act and multilateral initiatives such as Unesco’s Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence, the Hiroshima AI Process and the International Organisation for Standardisation and the International Electrotechnical Commission’s ISO/IEC 42001.
Open-source technology could also benefit from such governance.
- The author, Christopher K Tong, is associate professor of modern languages, linguistics and intercultural communication, University of Maryland, Baltimore County
- This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons licence. Read the original article
