TechCentralTechCentral
    Facebook Twitter YouTube LinkedIn
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn YouTube
    TechCentralTechCentral
    NEWSLETTER
    • News

      Load shedding returns, and may last until Thursday

      16 August 2022

      Jo’burg to issue RFP for 500MW of electricity ‘within weeks’

      16 August 2022

      MTN hires outgoing Icasa CEO Willington Ngwepe into top role

      16 August 2022

      Rain in embarrassing climbdown over Telkom statement

      16 August 2022

      Coal miner Seriti plans R12-billion Mpumalanga wind farm

      16 August 2022
    • World

      Semiconductor boom turns to bust

      16 August 2022

      Tencent plans to offload R400-billion Meituan stake: sources

      16 August 2022

      Ether leaps higher on verge of Merge

      16 August 2022

      Institutions eye crypto but retail investors remain nervous

      15 August 2022

      Tencent woes mount, even after $560-billion selloff

      12 August 2022
    • In-depth

      African unicorn Flutterwave battles fires on multiple fronts

      11 August 2022

      The length of Earth’s days has been increasing – and no one knows why

      7 August 2022

      As Facebook fades, the Mad Men of advertising stage a comeback

      2 August 2022

      Crypto breaks the rules. That’s the point

      27 July 2022

      E-mail scams are getting chillingly personal

      17 July 2022
    • Podcasts

      Qush on infosec: why prevention is always better than cure

      11 August 2022

      e4’s Adri Führi on encouraging more women into tech careers

      10 August 2022

      How South Africa can woo more women into tech

      4 August 2022

      Book and check-in via WhatsApp? FlySafair is on it

      28 July 2022

      Interview: Why Dell’s next-gen PowerEdge servers change the game

      28 July 2022
    • Opinion

      No reason South Africa should have a shortage of electricity: Ramaphosa

      11 July 2022

      Ntshavheni’s bias against the private sector

      8 July 2022

      South Africa can no longer rely on Eskom alone

      4 July 2022

      Has South Africa’s advertising industry lost its way?

      21 June 2022

      Rob Lith: What Icasa’s spectrum auction means for SA companies

      13 June 2022
    • Company Hubs
      • 1-grid
      • Africa Data Centres
      • Altron Document Solutions
      • Amplitude
      • Atvance Intellect
      • Axiz
      • BOATech
      • CallMiner
      • Digital Generation
      • E4
      • ESET
      • Euphoria Telecom
      • IBM
      • Kyocera Document Solutions
      • Microsoft
      • Nutanix
      • One Trust
      • Pinnacle
      • Skybox Security
      • SkyWire
      • Tarsus on Demand
      • Videri Digital
      • Zendesk
    • Sections
      • Banking
      • Broadcasting and Media
      • Cloud computing
      • Consumer electronics
      • Cryptocurrencies
      • Education and skills
      • Energy
      • Fintech
      • Information security
      • Internet and connectivity
      • Internet of Things
      • Investment
      • IT services
      • Motoring and transport
      • Public sector
      • Science
      • Social media
      • Talent and leadership
      • Telecoms
    • Advertise
    TechCentralTechCentral
    Home»Sections»Information security»A hack like this could start the next World War

    A hack like this could start the next World War

    Information security By Agency Staff8 March 2021
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn WhatsApp Telegram Email

    It may be years before we get the Franz Ferdinand hack, but one cyberattack has the potential to set off a global war the likes of which we’ve never seen. Think beyond power and Internet outages to banking failures, food shortages and poisoned water.

    In the latest offensive, Chinese-backed operatives exploited vulnerabilities in Microsoft’s Exchange Server with vibrations felt around the world, mostly among small and medium-sized enterprises. Two months ago, the US administration pointed the finger at Russia for a major attack on software provider SolarWinds, which appeared to target government customers.

    There’s no end in sight.

    All you need is one such hack to have gone too far and to trigger an outsize response, one that results in a set of chain reactions…

    So far, despite dozens of cyberattacks among superpowers over the past two decades, the world has kept spinning on its axis and life for most people has continued on largely unhindered. That could change at any moment.

    Trouble was already brewing in early 20th century Europe as various nations jostled for supremacy and started arming themselves accordingly. So, the June 1914 assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand, the heir presumptive to the throne of the Austro-Hungarian empire, was the match that lit the dry tinder of regional tensions, resulting in a war of attrition that left 20 million people dead.

    A single event

    The global war against terror, too, was catalysed with a single event. By the time al-Qaeda launched its attacks on the US mainland on 11 September 2001, the confrontation between extremist terrorist groups and the West was already fierce — the USS Cole was bombed in October 2000. The American response would expand from Afghanistan to Iraq, with territory less of an objective than control over populations, ideology and resources.

    Now we are experiencing a new type of combat. Where state and semi-state actors wage war against victims both targeted and broad, where the specific goals are unclear — perhaps disruption, possibly theft of technology and information, or even general fear, uncertainty and doubt — and the primary weapons are lines of software code. This style of battle has victims whose identities are not always known and perpetrators who hide their work.

    Witness China: The speed at which Beijing denies an attack is often inverse to its likely culpability. Or the US, for that matter. As far back as 2005, it collaborated with Israel to unleash the Stuxnet worm which hobbled Iran’s uranium enrichment programme. While neither has formally admitted to their role, they also haven’t been particularly vociferous in rebutting the charge.

    China is often quick to deny involvement in cyberattack incidents

    There’s a perverse parallel to be drawn between cyber weaponry and nuclear armaments. After the US dropped two atomic bombs on Japan in 1945 and brought the war in the Pacific to a close, fears rose that more horrifically destructive attacks might follow as nations including the Soviet Union, the UK, France and China developed their own capabilities. Yet the reverse was true, giving rise to the concept of Mutually Assured Destruction as a reason why restraint was observed.

    In the case of cyber warfare, though, nations appear unwilling to admit to their ability or deployment of such weaponry. As the New York Times wrote in 2012, then-President Barack Obama was reticent to publicise the US role in the Iran attacks for fear that doing so would allow other nations, terrorists or even hackers to justify similar action. It’s likely Beijing takes the same view by swiftly and repeatedly denying such offensives even when its fingerprints appear to be all over the attacks.

    While it may lack the mushroom cloud of an atom bomb or explosive force of missile strikes, the devastation could be as widespread

    Indeed, Obama and Chinese leader Xi Jinping stood on the White House steps in 2015 to announce a truce on economic cyber espionage — a detente of seemingly limited scope. Yet that cessation lasted less than four years amid allegations that China renewed its attacks. The US and its allies are unlikely to have refrained from hacking, either.And so the cyber capabilities will grow and incursions continue, tit-for-tat. All you need is one such hack to have gone too far and to trigger an outsize response, one that results in a set of chain reactions with multiple and continuous cyber retaliations paralysing power grids, data transmission, agriculture, information flow, transportation systems and food supply chains. While it may lack the mushroom cloud of an atom bomb or explosive force of missile strikes, the devastation could be as widespread and even lead to military confrontation.

    That’s why the best hope may be that the cyber equivalent of nukes are developed and obtained — and publicly acknowledged — by all major powers. These would be perceived to have the potential to overwhelm and cause so much upheaval and destruction that using them would be impossible. Yet their mere existence may once again give rise to the notion — and fear — of mutually assured destruction, and its paradoxical benefit: peace.  — By Tim Culpan, (c) 2021 Bloomberg LP

    Barack Obama Microsoft Tim Culpan top Xi Jinping
    Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn WhatsApp Telegram Email
    Previous ArticleBMW CFO brushes off Apple Car threat: ‘I sleep very peacefully’
    Next Article The start-up transforming carbon dioxide into stone

    Related Posts

    Load shedding returns, and may last until Thursday

    16 August 2022

    Jo’burg to issue RFP for 500MW of electricity ‘within weeks’

    16 August 2022

    MTN hires outgoing Icasa CEO Willington Ngwepe into top role

    16 August 2022
    Add A Comment

    Comments are closed.

    Promoted

    HPE SimpliVity: addressing SMBs’ data conundrums

    16 August 2022

    Digital transformation – don’t get caught unprepared

    16 August 2022

    Seven reasons your business needs IP surveillance cameras

    15 August 2022
    Opinion

    No reason South Africa should have a shortage of electricity: Ramaphosa

    11 July 2022

    Ntshavheni’s bias against the private sector

    8 July 2022

    South Africa can no longer rely on Eskom alone

    4 July 2022

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the best South African technology news and analysis delivered to your e-mail inbox every morning.

    © 2009 - 2022 NewsCentral Media

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.