TechCentralTechCentral
    Facebook Twitter YouTube LinkedIn
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn YouTube
    TechCentralTechCentral
    NEWSLETTER
    • News

      Standard Bank IT spending tops R10-billion in six months

      19 August 2022

      Hungry Prosus to splurge up to R30.7-billion on iFood stake

      19 August 2022

      Koeberg unit shut down due to mechanical fault

      19 August 2022

      Blue Label expects robust full-year earnings growth

      19 August 2022

      Sarb tells banks they should work with crypto exchanges

      18 August 2022
    • World

      15 September pegged as target date for ethereum’s big ‘Merge’

      19 August 2022

      Qualcomm gets serious about servers

      19 August 2022

      China blasts US over ‘discriminatory’ Chips Act

      18 August 2022

      Tencent reports first-ever sales decline

      17 August 2022

      Chip makers are flashing a big warning for the global economy

      17 August 2022
    • In-depth

      Are you a chronic procrastinator? Read this!

      18 August 2022

      Semiconductor boom turns to bust

      16 August 2022

      African unicorn Flutterwave battles fires on multiple fronts

      11 August 2022

      The length of Earth’s days has been increasing – and no one knows why

      7 August 2022

      As Facebook fades, the Mad Men of advertising stage a comeback

      2 August 2022
    • Podcasts

      Qush on infosec: why prevention is always better than cure

      11 August 2022

      e4’s Adri Führi on encouraging more women into tech careers

      10 August 2022

      How South Africa can woo more women into tech

      4 August 2022

      Book and check-in via WhatsApp? FlySafair is on it

      28 July 2022

      Interview: Why Dell’s next-gen PowerEdge servers change the game

      28 July 2022
    • Opinion

      How AI could transform financial services in emerging markets

      19 August 2022

      No reason South Africa should have a shortage of electricity: Ramaphosa

      11 July 2022

      Ntshavheni’s bias against the private sector

      8 July 2022

      South Africa can no longer rely on Eskom alone

      4 July 2022

      Has South Africa’s advertising industry lost its way?

      21 June 2022
    • Company Hubs
      • 1-grid
      • Africa Data Centres
      • Altron Document Solutions
      • Amplitude
      • Atvance Intellect
      • Axiz
      • BOATech
      • CallMiner
      • Digital Generation
      • E4
      • ESET
      • Euphoria Telecom
      • IBM
      • Kyocera Document Solutions
      • Microsoft
      • Nutanix
      • One Trust
      • Pinnacle
      • Skybox Security
      • SkyWire
      • Tarsus on Demand
      • Videri Digital
      • Zendesk
    • Sections
      • Banking
      • Broadcasting and Media
      • Cloud computing
      • Consumer electronics
      • Cryptocurrencies
      • Education and skills
      • Energy
      • Fintech
      • Information security
      • Internet and connectivity
      • Internet of Things
      • Investment
      • IT services
      • Motoring and transport
      • Public sector
      • Science
      • Social media
      • Talent and leadership
      • Telecoms
    • Advertise
    TechCentralTechCentral
    Home»News»Are we really safe from killer asteroids?

    Are we really safe from killer asteroids?

    News By Adam Minter13 November 2021
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn WhatsApp Telegram Email

    In April, scientists discovered an asteroid that had a roughly one in 2 500 chance of colliding with Earth in six months’ time.

    As the weeks passed, and observations improved, they determined that the space rock — perhaps 670m across — was on target for central Europe, potentially putting a million people in harm’s way.

    Scientists, space agencies and civil defence organisations scrambled to find a life-saving solution, but soon determined that it was too late.

    “The exercise played out that we basically had to take the hit,” said Lindley Johnson, Nasa’s planetary defence officer. Fortunately, that’s all it was: an exercise. But next time might not be.

    Depending on where such a rock landed, it could cause casualties exceeding any known natural disaster

    Scientists estimate that there’s roughly a one in 100 chance of an asteroid larger than 140m across hitting the Earth every century. Depending on where such a rock landed, it could cause casualties exceeding any known natural disaster.

    The good news is that Nasa has a plan for such a scenario. Later this month, the US space agency will launch Dart (or the Double Asteroid Redirection Test), a mission that will test technologies designed to divert dangerous space objects. The bad news is that actually intercepting a killer asteroid could be a far harder — and more expensive — undertaking.

    Every day, the Earth is hit by more than 100t of space dust that burns up in the atmosphere. Twice a year or so, a more sizeable asteroid — comparable to a car — will cause a significant explosion before burning up. Between 2000 and 2013, the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organisation detected 26 large asteroid blasts in the atmosphere, ranging from one to 600 kilotons. By comparison, the Hiroshima bomb measured 15 kilotons.

    Close calls

    Every so often, there are closer calls. In 2013, a 20m asteroid exploded 32km above Chelyabinsk, Russia, releasing roughly 500 kilotons of energy, knocking people off their feet and blowing out windows in thousands of buildings. Had the explosion occurred closer to the ground, the damage could’ve been catastrophic. A space rock that exploded 10km over Siberia in 1908 flattened 500 000 acres of forest. A blast of that scale over New York City would cause millions of casualties.

    In the late 1990s, Nasa began paying more serious attention to this threat. “Is the probability high that we’re going to see some existential moment because of an asteroid? No, it’s not high,” said Sean O’Keefe, the former US navy secretary who led Nasa from 2001 to 2005, on a Zoom call. “But to the extent that it happens, and you’ve done nothing to even see what it would take to prevent that, to deter that…” He paused, and smiled. “We can’t just sit back and say that the Serenity Prayer is what we’ll consult.”

    In 2005, the US congress mandated that Nasa detect and track 90% of all near-Earth objects greater than 140m in diameter within 15 years. As of January, about 38% of the projected 25 000 objects of that size had been found. Nasa is now developing a space telescope to continue the search, with a planned launch in 2026. But without a plan for further action, the data it collects won’t amount to much more than a prophecy of civilisational destruction.

    Fortunately, experts have been working on such plans for years. The most famous proposal, thanks largely to Hollywood, is to fire a nuclear device at the incoming rock to deflect or destroy it. Another is the equally film-worthy “gravity tractor”, which would work by flying a spacecraft beside an asteroid and slowly — over years or decades — shifting its path. Finally, there’s the impactor concept behind the Dart spacecraft, which will slam into the moonlet of a non-threatening asteroid next year, hoping to disrupt its orbit.

    In the meantime, no one should rest easy. Although there are no known killer asteroids bound for Earth, the Chelyabinsk blast surprised scientists — they were actually monitoring another asteroid that passed nearby that day — and as recent simulations have shown, a lot more preparation is needed to deal with an incoming threat.

    As a start, Nasa should build on Dart by testing a gravity-tractor deflection spacecraft. Although it sounds extreme, preparing for a nuclear-armed mission would also make sense; earlier this year, researchers at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and the Air Force Institute of Technology published a study on exactly that. Finally, as a 2018 report from the National Science and Technology Council suggested, the US should start evaluating global launch capabilities — and developing international protocols — in the event a rapid-response mission is needed.

    For now, these might seem like far-out ideas. But when that city-killing rock comes hurtling towards Earth, the only question anyone will be asking is: Who’s ready to launch?  — (c) 2021 Bloomberg LP

    Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn WhatsApp Telegram Email
    Previous ArticleWhite House spurns Intel plan to boost chip production
    Next Article Mobile operators withdraw spectrum lawsuits against Icasa

    Related Posts

    Standard Bank IT spending tops R10-billion in six months

    19 August 2022

    Hungry Prosus to splurge up to R30.7-billion on iFood stake

    19 August 2022

    Koeberg unit shut down due to mechanical fault

    19 August 2022
    Add A Comment

    Comments are closed.

    Promoted

    Does your contact centre have the CX factor?

    19 August 2022

    Entelek, A2pay to roll out 2 500 free Wi-Fi sites in South Africa

    18 August 2022

    Companies are drowning in data – but solutions are at hand

    18 August 2022
    Opinion

    How AI could transform financial services in emerging markets

    19 August 2022

    No reason South Africa should have a shortage of electricity: Ramaphosa

    11 July 2022

    Ntshavheni’s bias against the private sector

    8 July 2022

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the best South African technology news and analysis delivered to your e-mail inbox every morning.

    © 2009 - 2022 NewsCentral Media

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.