TechCentralTechCentral
    Facebook Twitter YouTube LinkedIn
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn YouTube
    TechCentral TechCentral
    NEWSLETTER
    • News

      Where to next for Dimension Data

      5 July 2022

      Zapper is said to seek fundraising at huge valuation

      5 July 2022

      Stage-5 load shedding to continue until Thursday

      5 July 2022

      Big step forward for Cell C as debt deal approved

      5 July 2022

      Eskom unions accept 7% wage offer

      5 July 2022
    • World

      Bitcoin hints at a bottom – but it may be different this time

      5 July 2022

      China, US war of words erupts over lunar missions

      5 July 2022

      Tether fails to calm jittery nerves

      4 July 2022

      EU to impose wide-ranging new rules on the crypto industry

      3 July 2022

      Crypto hedge fund Three Arrows files for bankruptcy

      3 July 2022
    • In-depth

      The bonfire of the NFTs

      5 July 2022

      The NFT party is over

      30 June 2022

      The great crypto crash: the fallout, and what happens next

      22 June 2022

      Goodbye, Internet Explorer – you really won’t be missed

      19 June 2022

      Oracle’s database dominance threatened by rise of cloud-first rivals

      13 June 2022
    • Podcasts

      How your organisation can triage its information security risk

      22 June 2022

      Everything PC S01E06 – ‘Apple Silicon’

      15 June 2022

      The youth might just save us

      15 June 2022

      Everything PC S01E05 – ‘Nvidia: The Green Goblin’

      8 June 2022

      Everything PC S01E04 – ‘The story of Intel – part 2’

      1 June 2022
    • Opinion

      South Africa can no longer rely on Eskom alone

      4 July 2022

      Has South Africa’s advertising industry lost its way?

      21 June 2022

      Rob Lith: What Icasa’s spectrum auction means for SA companies

      13 June 2022

      A proposed solution to crypto’s stablecoin problem

      19 May 2022

      From spectrum to roads, why fixing SA’s problems is an uphill battle

      19 April 2022
    • Company Hubs
      • 1-grid
      • Altron Document Solutions
      • Amplitude
      • Atvance Intellect
      • Axiz
      • BOATech
      • CallMiner
      • Digital Generation
      • E4
      • ESET
      • Euphoria Telecom
      • IBM
      • Kyocera Document Solutions
      • Microsoft
      • Nutanix
      • One Trust
      • Pinnacle
      • Skybox Security
      • SkyWire
      • Tarsus on Demand
      • Videri Digital
      • Zendesk
    • Sections
      • Banking
      • Broadcasting and Media
      • Cloud computing
      • Consumer electronics
      • Cryptocurrencies
      • Education and skills
      • Energy
      • Fintech
      • Information security
      • Internet and connectivity
      • Internet of Things
      • Investment
      • IT services
      • Motoring and transport
      • Public sector
      • Science
      • Social media
      • Talent and leadership
      • Telecoms
    • Advertise
    TechCentralTechCentral
    Home»World»Facebook shared data with Chinese device makers

    Facebook shared data with Chinese device makers

    World By Agency Staff6 June 2018
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn WhatsApp Telegram Email

    Facebook said it had data-sharing partnerships with four Chinese consumer device makers, including Huawei, escalating concerns that the social network has consistently failed to tell users how their personal information flows beyond Facebook.

    The disclosure came after Mark Warner, the top Democrat on the senate intelligence committee, said earlier on Tuesday that he saw “a serious danger” that Facebook shared user information with Chinese device makers. Facebook said it was careful about the partnerships, which were designed to help smartphone makers build custom versions of Facebook’s app. Still, the confirmation is likely to heighten scrutiny of the company’s privacy practices if the deals weren’t explicitly disclosed to users.

    “Facebook’s integrations with Huawei, Lenovo, Oppo and TCL were controlled from the get go — and we approved the Facebook experiences these companies built,” Francisco Varela, the company’s vice president of mobile partnerships, said in a statement. “Given the interest from congress, we wanted to make clear that all the information from these integrations with Huawei was stored on the device, not on Huawei’s servers.”

    We wanted to make clear that all the information from these integrations with Huawei was stored on the device, not on Huawei’s servers

    Facebook has been responding to a global backlash about how it handles users’ data, from lawmakers and privacy advocates in the US and Europe. The company sent CEO Mark Zuckerberg to Washington in April to undergo 10 hours of congressional questioning after a March revelation about an app developer that passed information on up to 87m Facebook users to a political consultancy, Cambridge Analytica. Zuckerberg told congress that the company’s policies no longer allow such lapses.

    Then, The New York Times reported on Sunday that the company had for years allowed deals with about 60 phone and device manufacturers, giving them access to vast amounts of information on users and their friends. It’s not clear yet whether any of the partners abused the data or transferred it to unauthorised parties. Still, the disclosure adds fuel to public distrust of the social network, whose main app has more than two billion users worldwide, and which owns other popular programs like Instagram, WhatsApp and Messenger. If users weren’t aware of device makers’ access, the deals could violate a 2011 US Federal Trade Commission consent decree.

    Facebook shares slipped in extended trading following the disclosure, after declining less than 1% to US$192.94 at the close in New York.

    The confirmation that Chinese device makers, especially Huawei, were among the manufacturers with access to user data raised even more questions among US lawmakers about how the information was stored and used.

    ‘Legitimate concerns’

    “The news that Facebook provided privileged access to Facebook’s API to Chinese device makers like Huawei and TCL raises legitimate concerns,” senator Warner of Virginia said after Facebook’s disclosure late on Tuesday. “I look forward to learning more about how Facebook ensured that information about their users was not sent to Chinese servers.”

    Huawei, China’s largest maker of telecommunications equipment, was founded in 1988 by former Chinese army officer Ren Zhengfei. Congress has barred the Pentagon from buying Huawei’s gear, along with ZTE, citing the companies’ connections to the Chinese government and the potential for intellectual property theft and spying.

    In April, the US Federal Communications Commission voted 5-0 to ban federal funds from being spent with the companies, citing concerns their products can provide “hidden back doors” into US computer networks that could inject viruses, spy on businesses and steal Americans’ private data, said FCC chairman Ajit Pai.

    Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg

    “Concerns about Huawei aren’t new — they were widely publicised beginning in 2012, when the house permanent select committee on intelligence released a well-read report on the close relationships between the Chinese Communist Party and equipment makers like Huawei,” Warner said in the statement late on Tuesday.

    Some US lawmakers, many of whom were already critical of Facebook’s response to earlier inquiries into the Cambridge Analytica data scandal, have been sceptical of Facebook’s explanations of its latest purported data lapse, and demanded more accountability.

    Senators John Thune and Bill Nelson, the Republican chairman and top Democrat respectively on the senate commerce committee asked Zuckerberg in a Tuesday letter for a full list of device makers with which Facebook had agreements. They also asked how the company verifies compliance with the agreements and whether Zuckerberg would like to amend his April testimony to the committee in which he said that users have “complete control” over how their data is shared.

    Facebook had already said in April that it was dismantling the device-maker data partnerships following a review of information-sharing agreements sparked by the Cambridge Analytica crisis. After The New York Times disclosed the names of device makers who had deals, the company said it was winding down the Huawei agreement this week.

    Still, Facebook defended the choice on Tuesday. “Huawei is the third largest mobile manufacturer globally and its devices are used by people all around the world, including in the US,” Varela said.  — Reported by Ben Brody and Sarah Frier, (c) 2018 Bloomberg LP

    Facebook Huawei Mark Zuckerberg ZTE
    Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn WhatsApp Telegram Email
    Previous ArticleITU Telecom World Awards launches 2018 edition
    Next Article Musk sees Tesla escaping purgatory

    Related Posts

    Bitcoin hints at a bottom – but it may be different this time

    5 July 2022

    China, US war of words erupts over lunar missions

    5 July 2022

    Tether fails to calm jittery nerves

    4 July 2022
    Add A Comment

    Comments are closed.

    Promoted

    Hot Ink certifies and diversifies to maintain competitive printing edge

    5 July 2022

    Increased flexibility with Dell Precision Mobile Workstations

    5 July 2022

    The 5 secrets of customer experience in the cloud era

    5 July 2022
    Opinion

    South Africa can no longer rely on Eskom alone

    4 July 2022

    Has South Africa’s advertising industry lost its way?

    21 June 2022

    Rob Lith: What Icasa’s spectrum auction means for SA companies

    13 June 2022

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the best South African technology news and analysis delivered to your e-mail inbox every morning.

    © 2009 - 2022 NewsCentral Media

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.