TechCentralTechCentral
    Facebook Twitter YouTube LinkedIn
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn YouTube
    TechCentralTechCentral
    NEWSLETTER
    • News

      Fixing SA’s power crisis is not complex: it simply takes the will to do better

      12 August 2022

      Consortium makes unsolicited bid for state’s 40% stake in Telkom

      12 August 2022

      Actually, solar users should pay more to access the grid – here’s why

      12 August 2022

      Telkom says MTN talks remain on track

      12 August 2022

      Analysis | Rain muddies the waters with approach to Telkom

      11 August 2022
    • World

      Tencent woes mount, even after $560-billion selloff

      12 August 2022

      Huawei just booked its first sales rise since US blacklisting

      12 August 2022

      Apple remains upbeat about iPhone sales even as Android world suffers

      12 August 2022

      Ether at two-month high as upgrade to blockchain passes major test

      12 August 2022

      Gaming industry’s fortunes fade as pandemic ends

      11 August 2022
    • In-depth

      African unicorn Flutterwave battles fires on multiple fronts

      11 August 2022

      The length of Earth’s days has been increasing – and no one knows why

      7 August 2022

      As Facebook fades, the Mad Men of advertising stage a comeback

      2 August 2022

      Crypto breaks the rules. That’s the point

      27 July 2022

      E-mail scams are getting chillingly personal

      17 July 2022
    • Podcasts

      Qush on infosec: why prevention is always better than cure

      11 August 2022

      e4’s Adri Führi on encouraging more women into tech careers

      10 August 2022

      How South Africa can woo more women into tech

      4 August 2022

      Book and check-in via WhatsApp? FlySafair is on it

      28 July 2022

      Interview: Why Dell’s next-gen PowerEdge servers change the game

      28 July 2022
    • Opinion

      No reason South Africa should have a shortage of electricity: Ramaphosa

      11 July 2022

      Ntshavheni’s bias against the private sector

      8 July 2022

      South Africa can no longer rely on Eskom alone

      4 July 2022

      Has South Africa’s advertising industry lost its way?

      21 June 2022

      Rob Lith: What Icasa’s spectrum auction means for SA companies

      13 June 2022
    • Company Hubs
      • 1-grid
      • Altron Document Solutions
      • Amplitude
      • Atvance Intellect
      • Axiz
      • BOATech
      • CallMiner
      • Digital Generation
      • E4
      • ESET
      • Euphoria Telecom
      • IBM
      • Kyocera Document Solutions
      • Microsoft
      • Nutanix
      • One Trust
      • Pinnacle
      • Skybox Security
      • SkyWire
      • Tarsus on Demand
      • Videri Digital
      • Zendesk
    • Sections
      • Banking
      • Broadcasting and Media
      • Cloud computing
      • Consumer electronics
      • Cryptocurrencies
      • Education and skills
      • Energy
      • Fintech
      • Information security
      • Internet and connectivity
      • Internet of Things
      • Investment
      • IT services
      • Motoring and transport
      • Public sector
      • Science
      • Social media
      • Talent and leadership
      • Telecoms
    • Advertise
    TechCentralTechCentral
    Home»Sections»Energy»How South Africa can consign load shedding to history

    How South Africa can consign load shedding to history

    Energy By The Conversation12 November 2021
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn WhatsApp Telegram Email

    The department of mineral resources & energy recently announced its choice of companies to build and operate a new “batch” of renewable energy projects. This is part of a programme in which the government invites private companies to compete for contracts to produce electricity and sell it to Eskom.

    In this most recent auction of contracts, known as “bid window 5”, 25 projects – 12 solar and 13 wind – totalling close to 2.6GW of capacity got the go-ahead. These projects are expected to come online in the next two to three years. The contracts last for 20 years.

    The power companies’ bids are scored mainly (90%) on the price at which they will sell electricity. The rest of the scoring (10%) is based on socioeconomic development criteria.

    The prices are now competitive with Eskom’s average cost of buying coal in the past financial year

    Bid window 5 marks the end of a long gap in procurement of renewable energy. South Africa started the procurement programme in 2011, and over the next four years awarded 102 renewable energy projects totalling more than 6.3GW. The programme was stopped in 2015 when Eskom’s leadership at the time refused to sign any more of these power purchase agreements.

    The bid window 5 results announcement signals a renewed commitment. Prices of awarded projects are extremely competitive – as low as 34.4c/kWh for onshore wind and 37.4c/kWh for solar PV. The average price for projects in the previous bid window was R1.03/kWh in April 2021 terms. The prices are now competitive with Eskom’s average cost of buying coal in the past financial year: 42c/kWh. And, of course, Eskom has the additional cost of running coal plants.

    Thus, it is now theoretically cheaper for Eskom to buy renewable energy from independent power producers than to run its more expensive coal power stations.

    Cost competitive

    The problem is that the power system is severely constrained, and needs much more capacity before this is a realistic option. One also needs more flexible resources on the grid to ensure reliability, and this adds to the costs.

    But I’ve been involved in research that shows renewable energy procurement programmes like this can secure projects that are built cost competitively – if well designed and implemented. This is so even in difficult investment contexts in the global south.

    My view is that South Africa’s renewable energy procurement programme has the potential to help restore energy security and eventually reduce power prices. This is despite some concerns that have been raised about the latest bid results. I will explain here why these issues aren’t reasons for concern.

    The concerns

    Three main concerns have emerged in response to the bid window 5:

    • The prices are too low to be realistic;
    • A few bidders will dominate the market; and
    • Tariffs for renewables can’t be compared with baseload tariffs.

    First, let’s consider the claim that “these prices are way too low. The projects will never be built at these costs.”

    While the announced prices are indeed around half of those of previous rounds, they aren’t unrealistic. Global renewable energy auctions have regularly delivered prices like these or even lower in the past two or three years. Examples can be found in Kazakhstan, Saudi Arabia, Portugal, Chile, Abu Dhabi, the US, Brazil and Uzbekistan. That’s of course without the additional requirements embedded in South Africa’s procurement programme – which push up capital and operating costs – but the point remains that these prices are feasible.

    South Africa also has one of the most onerous and expensive bidding programmes in the world. This is to guard against unrealistic bids being made. The country’s rate of successful bids that translate into projects is more than 95% – one of the best in the world.

    In short, there’s no reason to believe that new projects will not reach commercial operation because of prices.

    Second, there’s the concern that “we are seeing projects awarded to fewer and fewer bidders. Soon the market will be dominated by only a handful of international companies.”

    While it’s true that a small number of winning bidders were awarded the lion’s share of projects in this latest auction, it’s not true that this has resulted in market domination. The fact is that competition has been fiercer in each consecutive bidding round, and no company has been able to dominate the market from one round to the next.

    A degree of market concentration is inevitable in a competitive bidding process such as South Africa’s. This is because the larger, more experienced bidders are able to use economies of scale, financial innovation, stronger negotiation positions with suppliers and contractors and vertical integration to reduce costs. In turn, they can offer more competitive tariffs. But a number of medium sized companies have also been successful.

    Ecosystem

    And lead bidders represent only one part of the project value chain. Over the years, an extensive ecosystem of service providers and suppliers has grown around these projects. In addition, lead bidders aren’t the only shareholders in these companies. South African shareholders, including black economic empowerment partners and community trusts, own 49.4%, on average, in these projects.

    A third claim is: “You can’t compare the tariffs of these intermittent renewables with that of ‘baseload’, like coal or nuclear.”

    Let’s address a few issues here. Renewable supply is variable – not intermittent. Power system operators have become good at forecasting when the sun won’t shine or the wind won’t blow. That means that the flexible supply to complement renewable energy can be predicted.

    Anyway, “baseload” is an outdated concept. It comes from highly centralised power systems where the cheapest electricity was produced by massive coal or nuclear plants that couldn’t be switched on or off quickly. Cheap renewables are challenging this paradigm. Future power systems will be dominated by these variable resources backed up by storage and flexible resources such as gas or hydropower.

    South Africa’s 2019 integrated resource plan is premised on supplying reliable power. Its least-cost scenarios all pick wind, solar PV plus a flexible resource to meet future power demand securely.

    Going forward

    There are other concerns around the country’s renewable energy independent power producers procurement programme auctions. Maximising and broadening local benefits is important for the wider acceptance of this programme, which cumulatively has resulted in R250-billion in investment. But concerns should be based on facts.

    The latest auction has resulted in great prices for consumers and the majority of these projects will be built. Although a small number of international companies are prominent, competition is still fierce. There’s a place for local partners and smart medium-sized companies.

    As these renewable energy auctions are rolled out, coupled with complementary flexible resources, the country can consign power cuts to history.The Conversation

    • This article was written by Wikus Kruger, researcher in renewable energy, University of Cape Town
    • This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons licence
    Eskom Wikus Kruger
    Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn WhatsApp Telegram Email
    Previous ArticleEskom on track to split generation, transmission by end of 2021
    Next Article White House spurns Intel plan to boost chip production

    Related Posts

    Fixing SA’s power crisis is not complex: it simply takes the will to do better

    12 August 2022

    Consortium makes unsolicited bid for state’s 40% stake in Telkom

    12 August 2022

    Actually, solar users should pay more to access the grid – here’s why

    12 August 2022
    Add A Comment

    Comments are closed.

    Promoted

    Get your brand in front of TechCentral’s amazing audience

    12 August 2022

    Pricing Beyond CMYK: printers answer the FAQs

    11 August 2022

    How secure is your cloud?

    10 August 2022
    Opinion

    No reason South Africa should have a shortage of electricity: Ramaphosa

    11 July 2022

    Ntshavheni’s bias against the private sector

    8 July 2022

    South Africa can no longer rely on Eskom alone

    4 July 2022

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the best South African technology news and analysis delivered to your e-mail inbox every morning.

    © 2009 - 2022 NewsCentral Media

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.