TechCentralTechCentral
    Facebook Twitter YouTube LinkedIn
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn YouTube
    TechCentral TechCentral
    NEWSLETTER
    • News

      Shock as Mustek CEO David Kan dies

      19 May 2022

      Sabotage at Eskom’s Tutuka plant

      19 May 2022

      Reserve Bank eyes digital rand as it readies crypto regulations

      19 May 2022

      This crypto winter will be long, cold and harsh

      19 May 2022

      Haven’t had Covid yet? It could be more than just luck

      19 May 2022
    • World

      TikTok plans big push into gaming

      19 May 2022

      Musk says he will vote Republican, calls ESG a ‘scam’

      19 May 2022

      Crypto crash leaves El Salvador in a pickle

      19 May 2022

      Tencent leads big China tech selloff

      19 May 2022

      Russia seizes Google’s bank account, forcing bankruptcy

      18 May 2022
    • In-depth

      Elon Musk is becoming like Henry Ford – and that’s not a good thing

      17 May 2022

      Stablecoins wend wobbly way into the unknown

      17 May 2022

      The standard model of particle physics may be broken

      11 May 2022

      Meet Jared Birchall, Elon Musk’s personal ‘fixer’

      6 May 2022

      Twitter takeover was brash and fast, with Musk calling the shots

      26 April 2022
    • Podcasts

      Dean Broadley on why product design at Yoco is an evolving art

      18 May 2022

      Everything PC S01E02 – ‘AMD: Ryzen from the dead – part 2’

      17 May 2022

      Everything PC S01E01 – ‘AMD: Ryzen from the dead – part 1’

      10 May 2022

      Llew Claasen on how exchange controls are harming SA tech start-ups

      2 May 2022

      The inside scoop on OVEX’s big expansion plans

      20 April 2022
    • Opinion

      A proposed solution to crypto’s stablecoin problem

      19 May 2022

      From spectrum to roads, why fixing SA’s problems is an uphill battle

      19 April 2022

      How AI is being deployed in the fight against cybercriminals

      8 April 2022

      Cash is still king … but not for much longer

      31 March 2022

      Icasa on the role of TV white spaces and dynamic spectrum access

      31 March 2022
    • Company Hubs
      • 1-grid
      • Altron Document Solutions
      • Amplitude
      • Atvance Intellect
      • Axiz
      • BOATech
      • CallMiner
      • Digital Generation
      • E4
      • ESET
      • Euphoria Telecom
      • IBM
      • Kyocera Document Solutions
      • Microsoft
      • Nutanix
      • One Trust
      • Pinnacle
      • Skybox Security
      • SkyWire
      • Tarsus on Demand
      • Videri Digital
      • Zendesk
    • Sections
      • Banking
      • Broadcasting and Media
      • Cloud computing
      • Consumer electronics
      • Cryptocurrencies
      • Education and skills
      • Energy
      • Fintech
      • Information security
      • Internet and connectivity
      • Internet of Things
      • Investment
      • IT services
      • Motoring and transport
      • Public sector
      • Science
      • Social media
      • Talent and leadership
      • Telecoms
    • Advertise
    TechCentralTechCentral
    Home»News»Massive blow for Telkom in R3.9-billion tax case

    Massive blow for Telkom in R3.9-billion tax case

    News By Barbara Curson31 March 2020
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn WhatsApp Telegram Email

    A recent court decision has come as big blow to Telkom. A judgment handed down on 25 March by the supreme court of appeal held that a R3.9-billion foreign exchange loss and a R136-million incentive bonus were not deductible.

    This means the tax liability of R875-million raised by the tax commissioner for the 2012 tax year will now stand, and Telkom will also have to pay the costs of the commissioner’s three counsel.

    During May 2007, Telkom International, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Telkom, acquired 75% of the issued share capital in Multi-links Telecommunications, based in Nigeria. Telkom acquired the remaining share capital the following year.

    At the end of March 2019, Telkom had cash and cash equivalents of only R1.4 billion. It will now have to pay a tax liability of over R500-million

    Telkom also made various US dollar-denominated loans to Multi-links, which by October 2011, amounted to US$877-million. Of this, $346-million was converted into preference-share equity, and the remaining $531-million was reflected on the loan account.

    Multi-links was struggling, and the prospects of the loans being repaid were slim. No matter, Telkom continued advancing loans to Multi-links until October 2011, when Telkom sold its equity interests in Multi-links to Hip Oils Topco, an unrelated third party. The loan to Multi-links was included in the sale, and was priced at $100.

    For accounting purposes, Telkom reported a foreign exchange gain of R247-million on the realisation of the loan. For tax purposes, Telkom claimed a foreign exchange loss of R3.9-billion in terms of section 24I of the Income Tax Act. Telkom also claimed a deduction for a cash incentive bonus paid of R136-million.

    Disallowed

    The commissioner however disallowed both deductions, raised a tax liability of R875-million, and imposed an understatement penalty of R91-million.

    Telkom argued that the R3.9-billion foreign exchange loss reflected the commercial reality of the transaction, whereas the commissioner argued that the transaction resulted in a foreign exchange gain of R267-million.

    Telkom submitted that the commissioner’s interpretation produced a result that was removed from commercial reality, was not sensible or businesslike, undermined the purpose of section 24I of the act, and was “unjust, inequitable or unreasonable”.

    The Competition Commission wants Telkom to cut the cost of IPConnect

    The commissioner rejected Telkom’s contention that “rate” can mean an absolute amount, such as the $100, and that the “exchange difference” can only be calculated by comparing the difference between the rate on the realisation date, and the “spot rate” on the transaction or translation date.

    The supreme court agreed with the tax court that foreign currency amounts should be converted into rand “at a defined exchange rate”, and that the “consideration for the loan of $100 was agreed by reference only to the perceived value of the loan”.

    The supreme court, in rejecting Telkom’s argument, held that section 24I of the act “is not intended to deal with the tax consequences of commercial losses”.

    Telkom did not make any provision for a possible contingent liability as ‘the possibility of a loss arising is considered remote’

    “Its operation is limited to gains and losses arising out of currency fluctuations,” it said.

    The supreme court upheld the commissioner’s argument that Telkom could not generate a tax deduction based on the quality of foreign currency-denominated debt by applying a tax provision that dealt exclusively with gains and losses as a result of exchange rate differences.

    The court further ruled that the R91-million understatement penalty raised by the South African Revenue Service (Sars) should be set aside.

    Telkom, in its annual report dated 31 March 2019, stated: “As noted in the prior year consolidated annual financial statements, the tax treatment of the loss that arose in the 2012 and 2014 financial years on the sale of foreign subsidiaries is based on a specific set of circumstances and a complex legislative environment. The 2012 matter was heard in the tax court in August 2018 and an appeal has been filed against the tax court judgment received, and as such, the dispute with Sars remains unresolved. The tax refund received, relating to the 2012 sale, therefore remains contingent and will only be recognised once the matter has been resolved.”

    Severe impact

    Telkom did not make any provision for a possible contingent liability as “the possibility of a loss arising is considered remote”.

    Now that the supreme court of appeal has denied the deduction, Telkom may rue not making a provision.

    At the end of March 2019, Telkom had cash and cash equivalents of only R1.4 billion. It will now have to pay a tax liability of over R500-million, which will include a substantial amount of interest. This will severely impact its cash position.

    • This article was originally published on Moneyweb and is used here with permission
    Multi-Links Telkom top
    Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn WhatsApp Telegram Email
    Previous ArticleDemand for online services drives Naspers shares higher
    Next Article Telkom to take fight with Sars to the constitutional court

    Related Posts

    Shock as Mustek CEO David Kan dies

    19 May 2022

    Sabotage at Eskom’s Tutuka plant

    19 May 2022

    Reserve Bank eyes digital rand as it readies crypto regulations

    19 May 2022
    Add A Comment

    Comments are closed.

    Promoted

    Why fibre is the new utility – and what it means for South Africa

    19 May 2022

    Why data protection is the key to successful digital transformation

    19 May 2022

    Putting IT monitoring on the spot

    18 May 2022
    Opinion

    A proposed solution to crypto’s stablecoin problem

    19 May 2022

    From spectrum to roads, why fixing SA’s problems is an uphill battle

    19 April 2022

    How AI is being deployed in the fight against cybercriminals

    8 April 2022

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the best South African technology news and analysis delivered to your e-mail inbox every morning.

    © 2009 - 2022 NewsCentral Media

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.