TechCentralTechCentral
    Facebook Twitter YouTube LinkedIn
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn YouTube
    TechCentral TechCentral
    NEWSLETTER
    • News

      Eskom ramps up load shedding as crisis deepens

      30 June 2022

      Alviva shares leap higher on R3-billion take-private offer

      30 June 2022

      Huawei, MTN to help build 5G-powered ‘smart mine’

      30 June 2022

      Clear the regulatory fog, ISPs urge Icasa

      30 June 2022

      Datatec to sell Analysys Mason for as much as R4.1-billion

      30 June 2022
    • World

      Bitcoin just had its worst quarter in a decade

      30 June 2022

      The NFT party is over

      30 June 2022

      Samsung beats TSMC to 3nm chip production

      30 June 2022

      Napster plots crypto comeback

      29 June 2022

      Pictures: Chinese spacecraft acquires images of entire planet of Mars

      29 June 2022
    • In-depth

      The great crypto crash: the fallout, and what happens next

      22 June 2022

      Goodbye, Internet Explorer – you really won’t be missed

      19 June 2022

      Oracle’s database dominance threatened by rise of cloud-first rivals

      13 June 2022

      Everything Apple announced at WWDC – in less than 500 words

      7 June 2022

      Sheryl Sandberg’s ad empire leaves a complicated legacy

      2 June 2022
    • Podcasts

      How your organisation can triage its information security risk

      22 June 2022

      Everything PC S01E06 – ‘Apple Silicon’

      15 June 2022

      The youth might just save us

      15 June 2022

      Everything PC S01E05 – ‘Nvidia: The Green Goblin’

      8 June 2022

      Everything PC S01E04 – ‘The story of Intel – part 2’

      1 June 2022
    • Opinion

      Has South Africa’s advertising industry lost its way?

      21 June 2022

      Rob Lith: What Icasa’s spectrum auction means for SA companies

      13 June 2022

      A proposed solution to crypto’s stablecoin problem

      19 May 2022

      From spectrum to roads, why fixing SA’s problems is an uphill battle

      19 April 2022

      How AI is being deployed in the fight against cybercriminals

      8 April 2022
    • Company Hubs
      • 1-grid
      • Altron Document Solutions
      • Amplitude
      • Atvance Intellect
      • Axiz
      • BOATech
      • CallMiner
      • Digital Generation
      • E4
      • ESET
      • Euphoria Telecom
      • IBM
      • Kyocera Document Solutions
      • Microsoft
      • Nutanix
      • One Trust
      • Pinnacle
      • Skybox Security
      • SkyWire
      • Tarsus on Demand
      • Videri Digital
      • Zendesk
    • Sections
      • Banking
      • Broadcasting and Media
      • Cloud computing
      • Consumer electronics
      • Cryptocurrencies
      • Education and skills
      • Energy
      • Fintech
      • Information security
      • Internet and connectivity
      • Internet of Things
      • Investment
      • IT services
      • Motoring and transport
      • Public sector
      • Science
      • Social media
      • Talent and leadership
      • Telecoms
    • Advertise
    TechCentralTechCentral
    Home»Sections»Motoring and transport»Musk wars with key Tesla partner on Twitter

    Musk wars with key Tesla partner on Twitter

    Motoring and transport By Agency Staff22 April 2019
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn WhatsApp Telegram Email
    Elon Musk. Image c/o Nasa

    Elon Musk has engaged in Twitter spats with a long line of folks, from rival automakers to short-sellers and the Securities and Exchange Commission.

    He’s at it again, but this time the stakes could be even higher. He’s in a rare public dispute with a critical supplier: Panasonic, the company that makes all of the lithium-ion battery cells that power Tesla’s electric vehicles.

    The rift started with reports the companies are tempering expansion plans at their jointly operated battery plant near Reno, Nevada. Musk shot back in tweets that Panasonic is the culprit by operating at a reduced pace, constraining production of Tesla’s Model 3 sedan.

    Tesla and Panasonic need couple’s counseling ASAP. This is looking like a much more acrimonious relationship

    Even by Musk’s standards, it’s highly unusual for a company and its largest supplier to duel so openly. And the tiff once again raises questions about Tesla’s ability to sustain profitability amid concerns about demand. Tesla delivered just 63 000 cars globally in the first quarter, compared to almost 91 000 in the previous three months, and its stock is down almost 18% this year. Panasonic’s apparent reluctance to boost battery production only adds to the scepticism — and it may portend greater troubles.

    “Tesla and Panasonic need couple’s counseling ASAP,” said Craig Irwin of Roth Capital Partners. “This is looking like a much more acrimonious relationship.”

    Joined at the hip

    Tesla and Panasonic have been joined at the hip since the Gigafactory agreement was first announced in July 2014, even if on paper they’re a bit of an odd couple. One is a 16-year-old maker of electric vehicles run by an impetuous boss, the other a century-old conservative Japanese manufacturer.

    Tesla manages the Gigafactory but Panasonic is the principal partner, responsible for churning out cylindrical lithium-ion battery cells that Tesla buys and then packages into battery packs for the Model 3 sedan. The goal was to produce 35 gigawatt hours, or GWh, of cells per year by 2020, enough for roughly 400 000 Model 3s.

    But two weeks ago, Osaka-based Panasonic shocked the investment community when the Nikkei newspaper reported that Tesla and Panasonic were freezing plans to expand capacity beyond the initial 35GWh amid concerns about Tesla’s sales.

    The Tesla Model 3

    “Panasonic is a 101-year-old company,” said Chris Redl, senior portfolio manager at Gordian Capital Japan. “It’s extremely rare for a Japanese company to publicly air its grievances about a top customer via a story in the Nikkei.”

    Musk said that Panasonic’s cell lines have actually constrained Model 3 assembly because they are operating at just two-thirds capacity, or 24GWh.

    Panasonic did not directly respond to that assertion. But it said in a statement this week that as of the end of March the plant does have capacity for 35GWh. Both companies are in agreement that the Gigafactory is far from running at full production. What’s less clear is why and how they will proceed in the future.

    Tesla is starting to flirt with other battery makers in China, and Panasonic doesn’t like that

    “Tesla won’t spend money on more capacity until existing lines get closer to 35GWh theoretical,” Musk said in a tweet.

    Most analysts said they believe slow Tesla sales warranted capping battery-production lines. But another explanation offered up is that Panasonic is unhappy about a third party possibly messing up their marriage. While it is currently Tesla’s only supplier of automotive-grade batteries, Tesla is building another factory — known as Gigafactory Shanghai — and has talked with several Chinese-based suppliers, including CATL.

    “Tesla is starting to flirt with other battery makers in China, and Panasonic doesn’t like that,” said Sam Jaffe, MD of battery consulting firm Cairn ERA.

    Earnings report

    Tesla declined to comment beyond Musk’s tweets. It has warned investors that it expects first quarter net income will be “negatively impacted” by lower than projected delivery volumes and multiple price cuts. Tesla is having an Autonomy Investor Day at its Palo Alto, California headquarters on 22 April and will report earnings on 24 April.

    This isn’t the first time the two companies have struggled to match production lines. In a November interview, Panasonic President Kazuhiro Tsuga said that in 2017, Panasonic held back while Tesla worked through problems in its automation line. Then in 2018, as car output ramped up, it was Panasonic who lagged. Tsuga said the output on both sides was close to being evenly matched in early November and two additional cell-production lines would be added.

    The two companies are intertwined to a degree that any permanent split is likely out of the question, said analyst Irwin. Panasonic needs Tesla for the stability it brings to its battery business, he said, while “Tesla has nothing in batteries without Panasonic”.

    Still, the now-public rift shows how Panasonic may be worried about Tesla’s future, said Kazunori Ito, an analyst at Morningstar Investment Services in Tokyo.

    “With EV sales not growing as expected, Panasonic is increasingly unwilling to take risks,” Ito said. “Where it used to be two companies sharing a common destiny, it’s clear that Panasonic wants to distance itself from Tesla, and Tsuga is beginning to draw a line. Musk cannot be happy about that.”  — Reported by Dana Hull and Pavel Alpeyev, with assistance from Yuki Furukawa, (c) 2019 Bloomberg LP

    Elon Musk Panasonic Tesla
    Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn WhatsApp Telegram Email
    Previous ArticleChina outlines new approval process for world’s top games market
    Next Article Huawei thumbs nose at US with 39% revenue jump

    Related Posts

    Eskom ramps up load shedding as crisis deepens

    30 June 2022

    Alviva shares leap higher on R3-billion take-private offer

    30 June 2022

    Huawei, MTN to help build 5G-powered ‘smart mine’

    30 June 2022
    Add A Comment

    Comments are closed.

    Promoted

    Think herding cats is tricky? Try herding a cloud

    29 June 2022

    How your business can help hybrid workers effectively

    28 June 2022

    Hands off our satellite spectrum!

    27 June 2022
    Opinion

    Has South Africa’s advertising industry lost its way?

    21 June 2022

    Rob Lith: What Icasa’s spectrum auction means for SA companies

    13 June 2022

    A proposed solution to crypto’s stablecoin problem

    19 May 2022

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the best South African technology news and analysis delivered to your e-mail inbox every morning.

    © 2009 - 2022 NewsCentral Media

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.