TechCentralTechCentral
    Facebook Twitter YouTube LinkedIn
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn YouTube
    TechCentral TechCentral
    NEWSLETTER
    • News

      State capture probe ends but South Africa remains ‘broken’ by corruption

      23 June 2022

      Vivica Group, formerly Vox, looks beyond ICT

      23 June 2022

      Protests break out at Eskom plants

      23 June 2022

      South Africa scraps public mask mandate

      23 June 2022

      Crypto is not too big to fail

      23 June 2022
    • World

      Crypto crash survivors could become ‘tomorrow’s Amazons’

      23 June 2022

      Tether to launch a stablecoin tied to the British pound

      22 June 2022

      Tech giants form metaverse standards body, without Apple

      22 June 2022

      There are still unresolved matters in Twitter deal, Musk says

      21 June 2022

      5G subscriptions to top one billion in 2022: Ericsson

      21 June 2022
    • In-depth

      The great crypto crash: the fallout, and what happens next

      22 June 2022

      Goodbye, Internet Explorer – you really won’t be missed

      19 June 2022

      Oracle’s database dominance threatened by rise of cloud-first rivals

      13 June 2022

      Everything Apple announced at WWDC – in less than 500 words

      7 June 2022

      Sheryl Sandberg’s ad empire leaves a complicated legacy

      2 June 2022
    • Podcasts

      How your organisation can triage its information security risk

      22 June 2022

      Everything PC S01E06 – ‘Apple Silicon’

      15 June 2022

      The youth might just save us

      15 June 2022

      Everything PC S01E05 – ‘Nvidia: The Green Goblin’

      8 June 2022

      Everything PC S01E04 – ‘The story of Intel – part 2’

      1 June 2022
    • Opinion

      Has South Africa’s advertising industry lost its way?

      21 June 2022

      Rob Lith: What Icasa’s spectrum auction means for SA companies

      13 June 2022

      A proposed solution to crypto’s stablecoin problem

      19 May 2022

      From spectrum to roads, why fixing SA’s problems is an uphill battle

      19 April 2022

      How AI is being deployed in the fight against cybercriminals

      8 April 2022
    • Company Hubs
      • 1-grid
      • Altron Document Solutions
      • Amplitude
      • Atvance Intellect
      • Axiz
      • BOATech
      • CallMiner
      • Digital Generation
      • E4
      • ESET
      • Euphoria Telecom
      • IBM
      • Kyocera Document Solutions
      • Microsoft
      • Nutanix
      • One Trust
      • Pinnacle
      • Skybox Security
      • SkyWire
      • Tarsus on Demand
      • Videri Digital
      • Zendesk
    • Sections
      • Banking
      • Broadcasting and Media
      • Cloud computing
      • Consumer electronics
      • Cryptocurrencies
      • Education and skills
      • Energy
      • Fintech
      • Information security
      • Internet and connectivity
      • Internet of Things
      • Investment
      • IT services
      • Motoring and transport
      • Public sector
      • Science
      • Social media
      • Talent and leadership
      • Telecoms
    • Advertise
    TechCentralTechCentral
    Home»Sections»Consumer electronics»Samsung’s Galaxy Fold is more concept than finished product

    Samsung’s Galaxy Fold is more concept than finished product

    Consumer electronics By Agency Staff23 April 2019
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn WhatsApp Telegram Email

    Samsung Electronics on Monday delayed the Galaxy Fold, a US$1 980 device that unfolds from a smartphone into a small tablet. After one review unit loaned to Bloomberg News stopped working two days into a test, and a replacement revealed other limitations, it’s clear why the Korean technology giant is delaying the launch.

    Problems with the Fold screen would be a deal-breaker all on their own. But the issues go deeper. As a phone, it’s not good enough. As a tablet, there are also too many drawbacks. As a combined device that can morph between the two, the Galaxy Fold is an intriguing sneak peek at what might be possible in the future of mobile computing — but probably not for years.

    The first Fold review model arrived on 15 April. It was an exciting moment. In a world awash with black, shiny rectangles from Apple, Google and others, Samsung was at least trying something different.

    Unfolding the gadget revealed a large, bright and colourful display. But that’s when the serious flaws emerged

    However, it quickly became apparent that compromises had been made. When using the phone in folded format, the device was thick and somewhat cumbersome — about the width of two regular smartphones. The 4.3-inch screen wasn’t useful for much beyond making and receiving calls; it’s too narrow for typing anything other than quick messages. The front display also looked odd compared to today’s full-screen phones, with very thick top and bottom bezels. Beyond that, the front glass seemed as durable as other smartphones.

    Unfolding the gadget revealed a large, bright and colourful display. But that’s when the serious flaws emerged. The inside screen had a plastic film that looked like a screen protector or any other thin piece of plastic that would come on a new phone, table or TV set when you take it out of the box. This protective layer began to peel in the left corner and the natural urge was to remove it. Once the film was off, the display started failing almost immediately. Samsung did not tell reviewers to keep this film on the device, nor did the packaging warn users against removing it.

    Stopped functioning

    A day later, the left side of the folding display stopped functioning. Later that night, about three-quarters of the right side of the screen went black. By the next morning, the entire folding screen was dead. A small tear also developed at the top of the hinge. Poking at this may have contributed to the display problems. Still, a thin film should not be the difference between a $1 980 phone working and completely malfunctioning.

    After several reviewers complained, Samsung asked to pick up the broken Fold on Thursday. It provided a replacement a day later. The second unit had no warnings about the crucial screen protector, but Samsung said last week it will make this requirement clear to consumers.

    Over the weekend, with the screen protector in place, the second Fold phone avoided the fate of its sibling. However, out of the box, the film had dimple-like puncture marks on the left side of the unfolded screen. There was also a noticeable gap between the edges of the screen protector and the actual side of the display, potentially leaving room for dust and lint to accumulate. After two days of normal use, slight marks developed at the edge of the screen protector.

    The Samsung Galaxy Fold

    Other small marks appeared across the screen as well, suggesting the Fold may not hold up well over time. There’s also a lot of glare and reflection, which makes viewing difficult in some lighting conditions.

    The screen also had a noticeable crease across the centre where it folds. When watching video, the crease wasn’t that visible. But you can see it when when doing other things such as reading a blog post or tapping through an app.

    While not perfect, the software was the most polished part of the Galaxy Fold experience. Many apps seamlessly transitioned from the small screen to the unfolded screen (though you’ll rarely use that smaller screen). Some of the operating system’s built-in functions also took advantage of the larger screen. Taking pictures with the very good camera by using a larger view finder was a great experience. The ability to run three apps at once and move them around to your liking works well once you set it up and get used to the interface.

    The Galaxy Fold bursts with potential. Either Samsung or another company will eventually perfect it

    After almost a week with the Galaxy Fold, Samsung’s effort feels like a concept device, not a finished product. The display had far too many flaws. The ability to have both a phone and a tablet in your pocket is a fascinating idea, but it’s still just an idea.

    Users may be better off spending $1 000 on the Galaxy S10+ smartphone, $250 for an 8-inch Samsung tablet, and saving roughly $750. Apple fans can consider an $1 100 iPhone Xs Max, plus the $400 iPad mini, while pocketing the remaining $500.

    The Galaxy Fold bursts with potential. Either Samsung or another company will eventually perfect it. If such a device can master being both a phone and a tablet, with optimised software and without those display flaws, it could be the next big mobile hit.  — Reported by Mark Gurman, (c) 2019 Bloomberg LP

    Galaxy Fold Samsung Samsung Fold Samsung Galaxy Fold top
    Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn WhatsApp Telegram Email
    Previous ArticleTwitter loses six million users, but revenue jumps
    Next Article SA start-up Snapt snags Nasa and billionaires’ backing

    Related Posts

    State capture probe ends but South Africa remains ‘broken’ by corruption

    23 June 2022

    Vivica Group, formerly Vox, looks beyond ICT

    23 June 2022

    Protests break out at Eskom plants

    23 June 2022
    Add A Comment

    Comments are closed.

    Promoted

    Huawei P50 now available for pre-order in South Africa

    23 June 2022

    Calabrio paves way for SA’s cloud contact centre WFO journey alongside AWS

    23 June 2022

    More than card machines – iKhokha diversifies to reach more SMEs

    22 June 2022
    Opinion

    Has South Africa’s advertising industry lost its way?

    21 June 2022

    Rob Lith: What Icasa’s spectrum auction means for SA companies

    13 June 2022

    A proposed solution to crypto’s stablecoin problem

    19 May 2022

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the best South African technology news and analysis delivered to your e-mail inbox every morning.

    © 2009 - 2022 NewsCentral Media

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.