TechCentralTechCentral

    Subscribe to the newsletter

    Get the best South African technology news and analysis delivered to your e-mail inbox every morning.

    Facebook X (Twitter) YouTube LinkedIn
    WhatsApp Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn YouTube
    TechCentralTechCentral
    • News

      Wits researchers pioneer new way to search for dark matter

      28 November 2023

      Mozambique approves R1.5-trillion energy plan

      28 November 2023

      Inside the plan to fix Cell C once and for all

      27 November 2023

      SIU still gunning for Telkom

      27 November 2023

      SABC names MTN’s Nomsa Chabeli as its new CEO

      27 November 2023
    • World

      Orange withdraws from process to buy into Ethio Telecom

      28 November 2023

      Musk’s X hit by advertiser exodus

      27 November 2023

      Battery prices are tumbling as input costs fall

      27 November 2023

      Paris mayor quits X, calling Musk platform a ‘gigantic global sewer’

      27 November 2023

      Huawei to move smart car operations to new JV

      27 November 2023
    • In-depth

      Africa has a feature phone problem

      23 November 2023

      Is your ISP monitoring your online activity?

      10 November 2023

      The real Big Brother Africa

      2 November 2023

      Compared: Starlink prices around the world – including Africa

      30 October 2023

      Africa is booming

      30 October 2023
    • TCS

      TCS+ | Ricoh – safe and secure role in today’s digital ecosystems

      27 November 2023

      TCS+ | NEC XON on going toe to toe with cybercriminals

      22 November 2023

      TCS | How ShotSpotter is fighting gun crime in Cape Town

      13 November 2023

      TCS+ | SOC-as-a-service: CYBER1 SOC and the future of cybersecurity

      13 November 2023

      TCS+ | Why your company needs Arctic Wolf to stay secure

      9 November 2023
    • Opinion

      Could Cape Town become Africa’s Silicon Valley?

      14 November 2023

      Chris Kruger: What I learnt in my decades in IT leadership

      6 November 2023

      Ransomware attacks: how South African companies should respond

      6 November 2023

      Fibre providers urged to go ‘nano’ to cut costs

      31 October 2023

      Big banks, take note: PayShap should be free

      20 October 2023
    • Company Hubs
      • 4IRI
      • Africa Data Centres
      • Altron Document Solutions
      • Altron Systems Integration
      • Arctic Wolf
      • AvertITD
      • CallMiner
      • CoCre8
      • CYBER1 Solutions
      • Digicloud Africa
      • Digimune
      • E4
      • Entelect
      • ESET
      • Euphoria Telecom
      • iKhokha
      • Incredible Business
      • iONLINE
      • LSD Open
      • Maxtec
      • MiRO
      • NEC XON
      • Next DLP
      • Paratus
      • Ricoh
      • Skybox Security
      • SkyWire
      • Velocity Group
      • Videri Digital
    • Sections
      • AI and machine learning
      • Banking
      • Broadcasting and Media
      • Cloud computing
      • Consumer electronics
      • Cryptocurrencies
      • E-commerce
      • Education and skills
      • Energy
      • Fintech
      • Information security
      • Internet and connectivity
      • Internet of Things
      • Investment
      • IT services
      • Metaverse and gaming
      • Motoring and transport
      • Open-source software
      • Public sector
      • Science
      • Social media
      • Talent and leadership
      • Telecoms
    • Events
    • Advertise
    TechCentralTechCentral
    Home » News » African governments are ignoring privacy laws with impunity

    African governments are ignoring privacy laws with impunity

    By The Conversation22 October 2021
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn WhatsApp Telegram Email

    On paper, privacy rights for citizens of countries throughout Africa are well protected. Privacy rights are written into constitutions, international human rights conventions and domestic law.

    But, in the first comparative review of privacy protections across Africa, the evidence is clear: Governments are purposefully using laws that lack clarity. Or they ignore laws completely in order to carry out illegal digital surveillance of their citizens.

    What’s more, they are doing so with impunity.

    This matters because people’s lives are increasingly being lived online, through conversations on social media, online banking and the like.

    Governments are purposefully using laws that lack clarity. Or they ignore laws completely

    We’ve just published research on privacy protections in six African countries – Egypt, Kenya, Nigeria, Senegal, South Africa and Sudan. And the evidence is clear: Governments are using laws that lack clarity, or ignoring laws completely, to carry out illegal surveillance of their citizens.

    Those targeted include political opponents, business rivals and peaceful activists. In many cases they were conducting mass surveillance of citizens.

    Our report finds that existing surveillance law is being eroded by six factors:

    • The introduction of new laws that expand state surveillance powers;
    • Lack of legal precision and privacy safeguards in existing surveillance legislation;
    • Increased supply of new surveillance technologies that enable illegitimate surveillance;
    • State agencies regularly conducting surveillance outside of what is permitted in law;
    • Impunity for those committing illegitimate acts of surveillance; and
    • Insufficient capacity in civil society to hold the state fully accountable in law.

    Governments argue that it is occasionally necessary to violate the privacy rights of a citizen in order to prevent a much greater crime. For instance, a person may be a suspected terrorist.

    But the covert nature of surveillance, and the large power imbalance between the state and the people being watched, presents a clear opportunity to abuse power.

    Robust surveillance laws are key to preventing this. They must define exactly when it is legal to conduct narrowly targeted surveillance of the most serious criminals, while protecting the privacy rights of the rest of the population.

    Team of researchers

    We are a team of researchers from the Institute of Development Studies and the African Digital Rights Network.

    We assessed surveillance laws in the six countries using principles from globally accepted human rights frameworks. These included International Principles on the Application of Human Rights to Communications Surveillance, the UN Draft Instrument on Government-led Surveillance and Privacy and the African Commission’s Declaration of Principles of Freedom of Expression and Access to Information.

    Our team of researchers produced six country reports that detailed specific cases. These included rulings from the constitutional courts in South Africa and Kenya.

    We found that all six countries had conducted surveillance that violated citizens’ constitutional rights. There were many examples of surveillance violating rights or laws. There were no examples of those responsible being charged, subject to legal sanctions, resigning or being fired.

    To understand whether privacy rights are being violated, it’s necessary to monitor the legality of surveillance. But this is hard to do due to weak legal provisions, and a lack of transparency and oversight.

    Monitoring surveillance practice against privacy right protections requires well defined transparency and independent oversight mechanisms. These are entirely missing or deficient in all of the countries studied. With the exception of South Africa, countries studied lacked a single law clearly defining legal surveillance and privacy safeguards.

    In addition, piecemeal provisions, spread across multiple pieces of legislation, can conflict with each other. This makes it impossible for citizens to know what law is applicable.

    We found a number of barriers to making surveillance more accountable:

    • Legal provisions enabling surveillance are found in different laws. This makes it difficult to tell which law applies.
    • Independent oversight bodies to monitor the activities of law enforcement authorities are absent.
    • Investigating authorities do not publicly report on their activities.
    • Individuals subject surveillance are not notified about it nor are they afforded the opportunity to appeal.
    • There are several surveillance provisions that are not subject to the supervision of a judge. For instance, access to a database of subscribers by security agencies only requires the approval of a government agency (such as the Nigeria Communication Commission) which is granted under the Registration of Telephone Subscribers Regulations.

    Beyond the use (or abuse) of law, we also found evidence of states investing in new surveillance technologies. These included artificial intelligence-based Internet and mobile surveillance, mobile spyware, biometric digital ID systems, CCTV with facial recognition and vehicle licence plate recognition.

    In Nigeria, for example, the government increased spending in the last decade on acquiring various surveillance technologies. More recently it approved a supplementary budget to purchase tools capable of monitoring encrypted WhatsApp communications.

    What to do

    This combination of new technologies and surveillance law breaches points to an urgent need to strengthen existing laws by applying human rights principles.

    We recommend that an independent oversight body should supervise the activities of the investigating authorities. We also recommend the use of strategic litigation to challenge existing laws and actions that violate constitutionally guaranteed rights.

    Alongside improving the law must be action to raise public awareness of privacy rights and surveillance practices. A strong civil society, independent media and independent courts are needed to challenge government actions. This is critical for holding governments accountable and upholding the privacy rights of citizens everywhere.

    • Abrar Mohamed Ali, Mohamed Farahat, Ridwan Oloyede and Grace Mutung’u were the researchers on this project. Ridwan Oloyede assisted in the writing of this article
    • Written by Tony Roberts, digital research fellow, Institute of Development Studies
    • This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons licence
    Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn WhatsApp Telegram Email
    Previous ArticleEskom had ‘fruitful’ talks with Western climate envoys: CEO
    Next Article Bitcoin’s next big test seen as $90 000

    Related Posts

    Wits researchers pioneer new way to search for dark matter

    28 November 2023

    Mozambique approves R1.5-trillion energy plan

    28 November 2023

    Inside the plan to fix Cell C once and for all

    27 November 2023
    Promoted

    Wellavi, Digimune redefine holistic wellbeing in Africa

    28 November 2023

    NEC XON, MTN launch Africa’s first 400G optical transponder

    27 November 2023

    AfricaCom: 5G the key to Africa’s business success

    27 November 2023
    Opinion

    Could Cape Town become Africa’s Silicon Valley?

    14 November 2023

    Chris Kruger: What I learnt in my decades in IT leadership

    6 November 2023

    Ransomware attacks: how South African companies should respond

    6 November 2023

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the best South African technology news and analysis delivered to your e-mail inbox every morning.

    © 2009 - 2023 NewsCentral Media

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.