Close Menu
TechCentralTechCentral

    Subscribe to the newsletter

    Get the best South African technology news and analysis delivered to your e-mail inbox every morning.

    Facebook X (Twitter) YouTube LinkedIn
    WhatsApp Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn YouTube
    TechCentralTechCentral
    • News

      Vodacom’s Maziv deal gets makeover ahead of crucial hearing

      18 July 2025

      Cut electricity prices for data centres: Andile Ngcaba

      18 July 2025

      Takealot taps Mr D to deliver toys, pet food and future growth

      18 July 2025

      ‘Oh, Ani!’: Elon’s edgy bot stirs ethical storm

      18 July 2025

      Trump U-turn on Nvidia spurs talk of grand bargain with China

      18 July 2025
    • World

      Grok 4 arrives with bold claims and fresh controversy

      10 July 2025

      Samsung’s bet on folding phones faces major test

      10 July 2025

      Bitcoin pushes higher into record territory

      10 July 2025

      OpenAI to launch web browser in direct challenge to Google Chrome

      10 July 2025

      Cupertino vs Brussels: Apple challenges Big Tech crackdown

      7 July 2025
    • In-depth

      The 1940s visionary who imagined the Information Age

      14 July 2025

      MultiChoice is working on a wholesale overhaul of DStv

      10 July 2025

      Siemens is battling Big Tech for AI supremacy in factories

      24 June 2025

      The algorithm will sing now: why musicians should be worried about AI

      20 June 2025

      Meta bets $72-billion on AI – and investors love it

      17 June 2025
    • TCS

      TCS+ | Samsung unveils significant new safety feature for Galaxy A-series phones

      16 July 2025

      TCS+ | MVNX on the opportunities in South Africa’s booming MVNO market

      11 July 2025

      TCS | Connecting Saffas – Renier Lombard on The Lekker Network

      7 July 2025

      TechCentral Nexus S0E4: Takealot’s big Post Office jobs plan

      4 July 2025

      TCS | Tech, townships and tenacity: Spar’s plan to win with Spar2U

      3 July 2025
    • Opinion

      A smarter approach to digital transformation in ICT distribution

      15 July 2025

      In defence of equity alternatives for BEE

      30 June 2025

      E-commerce in ICT distribution: enabler or disruptor?

      30 June 2025

      South Africa pioneered drone laws a decade ago – now it must catch up

      17 June 2025

      AI and the future of ICT distribution

      16 June 2025
    • Company Hubs
      • Africa Data Centres
      • AfriGIS
      • Altron Digital Business
      • Altron Document Solutions
      • Altron Group
      • Arctic Wolf
      • AvertITD
      • Braintree
      • CallMiner
      • CambriLearn
      • CYBER1 Solutions
      • Digicloud Africa
      • Digimune
      • Domains.co.za
      • ESET
      • Euphoria Telecom
      • Incredible Business
      • iONLINE
      • Iris Network Systems
      • LSD Open
      • NEC XON
      • Network Platforms
      • Next DLP
      • Ovations
      • Paracon
      • Paratus
      • Q-KON
      • SevenC
      • SkyWire
      • Solid8 Technologies
      • Telit Cinterion
      • Tenable
      • Vertiv
      • Videri Digital
      • Wipro
      • Workday
    • Sections
      • AI and machine learning
      • Banking
      • Broadcasting and Media
      • Cloud services
      • Contact centres and CX
      • Cryptocurrencies
      • Education and skills
      • Electronics and hardware
      • Energy and sustainability
      • Enterprise software
      • Fintech
      • Information security
      • Internet and connectivity
      • Internet of Things
      • Investment
      • IT services
      • Lifestyle
      • Motoring
      • Public sector
      • Retail and e-commerce
      • Science
      • SMEs and start-ups
      • Social media
      • Talent and leadership
      • Telecoms
    • Events
    • Advertise
    TechCentralTechCentral
    Home » News » Cell C lashes out at court judgment

    Cell C lashes out at court judgment

    By Duncan McLeod13 November 2014
    Twitter LinkedIn Facebook WhatsApp Email Telegram Copy Link
    News Alerts
    WhatsApp

    Cell-C-640

    Cell C said on Thursday evening that high court judge Sharise Weiner erred in her judgment in favour of one of the mobile operator’s clients, warning that her ruling has “wide-ranging implications” for South African business.

    In her judgment, handed down earlier in the day, Weiner sided with the disgruntled customer, who had placed a high-profile banner along a busy Johannesburg street decrying the mobile operator’s customer service levels. Cell C had brought an urgent application to the high court to have the banner, erected on the side of a shopping centre on Beyers Naude Drive in Randburg, removed.

    The company said one of its employees, Riaan van Rooyen, whose name and telephone number had been printed on the banner, had been “harassed and verbally abused” after the banner went up.

    But the court found that criticism such as that contained in the banner was protected as long as it held fair comment. “The application is not urgent,” judge Weiner found, adding that the damage to Cell C’s reputation had already been done. It would stay up, she said.

    The banner was paid for and erected by a George Prokas.

    Cell C has made it clear that it is not impressed with the court judgment.

    “Cell C is of the view that on the face of it, the judgment contains fundamental errors that have wide-reaching implications. Irrespective of the specific issues in this particular matter, these errors need to be rectified and so Cell C is considering appealing the decision.”

    The operator said it is “disappointed” by the judgment. “The judge did not address our primary reason for taking this matter to court, namely the protection of the personal information and privacy of our employee.”

    Van Rooyen, who works for the company’s Sandton City branch, had his name and cellphone number plastered in a large font on the banner.

    “As a result of the banner being erected, Riaan has been harassed and verbally abused. People should reasonably ask what they would expect their companies to do if they were subject to this kind of harassment and abuse simply as a result of them doing their jobs,” the operator said.

    “With the increased focus and awareness of the protection of personal information, it is surprising that the publication of Riaan’s personal information was not addressed in the judgment. The undertaking made by Mr Prokas not to republish this personal information was only given to the court during argument yesterday, and as a result of the urgent application having been brought by Cell C.”

    In addition, the judgment has “far-reaching consequences for any business in South Africa”, Cell C said.

    “From the large business to the corner shop, businesses now face the risk of having their reputations tarnished by an individual who can make defamatory statements, as long as this is expressed as an opinion of personal experience with only cursory and, in our view, selectively chosen factual foundations.

    “The judgment also suggests that businesses should urgently apply to court for an interdict as soon as somebody merely threatens them with the publication of unfounded defamatory statements. This is impractical.”

    Cell C denied “reports in some media” about Prokas’s claim that he was billed for somebody else’s use of his cellphone. “The underlying fact is that Mr Prokas owes Cell C for services rendered and these will be pursued in a separate legal process. Despite Mr Prokas’s negative comments on his banner, he continues to use our services.”

    The company added: “Mr Prokas had several alternative channels at his disposal and it is most unfortunate that he chose to deal with the matter in this way. Cell C has been at the forefront of lowering the cost to communicate for millions of South Africans irrespective of the network that they use. We are proud of these achievements and that is why we take customer service very seriously and we never like to hear that we might have fallen short in this regard. Where necessary, corrective measures will always be implemented.”  — (c) 2014 NewsCentral Media



    Cell C George Prokas Riaan van Rooyen Sharise Weiner
    Subscribe to TechCentral Subscribe to TechCentral
    Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn WhatsApp Telegram Email Copy Link
    Previous ArticleCell C must pay client’s legal costs
    Next Article Editors concerned after parly feed cut

    Related Posts

    Blue Label Telecoms to change its name as restructuring gathers pace

    11 July 2025

    Listed: All the MVNOs in South Africa – 2025 edition

    19 June 2025

    MVNO boom is reshaping South Africa’s mobile market

    12 June 2025
    Company News

    Vertiv to acquire custom rack solutions manufacturer

    18 July 2025

    SA businesses embrace gen AI – but strategy and skills are lagging

    17 July 2025

    Ransomware in South Africa: the human factor behind the growing crisis

    16 July 2025
    Opinion

    A smarter approach to digital transformation in ICT distribution

    15 July 2025

    In defence of equity alternatives for BEE

    30 June 2025

    E-commerce in ICT distribution: enabler or disruptor?

    30 June 2025

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the best South African technology news and analysis delivered to your e-mail inbox every morning.

    © 2009 - 2025 NewsCentral Media

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.