TechCentralTechCentral
    Facebook Twitter YouTube LinkedIn
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn YouTube
    TechCentral TechCentral
    NEWSLETTER
    • News

      Alviva shares leap higher on R3-billion take-private offer

      30 June 2022

      Datatec to sell Analysys Mason for as much as R4.1-billion

      30 June 2022

      Futuregrowth launches start-up fund, targets R600-million raise

      30 June 2022

      Eskom is killing the rand

      30 June 2022

      Eskom ramps up load shedding as crisis deepens

      30 June 2022
    • World

      Graphics card prices plummet as crypto demand dries up

      30 June 2022

      Bitcoin just had its worst quarter in a decade

      30 June 2022

      The NFT party is over

      30 June 2022

      Samsung beats TSMC to 3nm chip production

      30 June 2022

      Napster plots crypto comeback

      29 June 2022
    • In-depth

      The great crypto crash: the fallout, and what happens next

      22 June 2022

      Goodbye, Internet Explorer – you really won’t be missed

      19 June 2022

      Oracle’s database dominance threatened by rise of cloud-first rivals

      13 June 2022

      Everything Apple announced at WWDC – in less than 500 words

      7 June 2022

      Sheryl Sandberg’s ad empire leaves a complicated legacy

      2 June 2022
    • Podcasts

      How your organisation can triage its information security risk

      22 June 2022

      Everything PC S01E06 – ‘Apple Silicon’

      15 June 2022

      The youth might just save us

      15 June 2022

      Everything PC S01E05 – ‘Nvidia: The Green Goblin’

      8 June 2022

      Everything PC S01E04 – ‘The story of Intel – part 2’

      1 June 2022
    • Opinion

      Has South Africa’s advertising industry lost its way?

      21 June 2022

      Rob Lith: What Icasa’s spectrum auction means for SA companies

      13 June 2022

      A proposed solution to crypto’s stablecoin problem

      19 May 2022

      From spectrum to roads, why fixing SA’s problems is an uphill battle

      19 April 2022

      How AI is being deployed in the fight against cybercriminals

      8 April 2022
    • Company Hubs
      • 1-grid
      • Altron Document Solutions
      • Amplitude
      • Atvance Intellect
      • Axiz
      • BOATech
      • CallMiner
      • Digital Generation
      • E4
      • ESET
      • Euphoria Telecom
      • IBM
      • Kyocera Document Solutions
      • Microsoft
      • Nutanix
      • One Trust
      • Pinnacle
      • Skybox Security
      • SkyWire
      • Tarsus on Demand
      • Videri Digital
      • Zendesk
    • Sections
      • Banking
      • Broadcasting and Media
      • Cloud computing
      • Consumer electronics
      • Cryptocurrencies
      • Education and skills
      • Energy
      • Fintech
      • Information security
      • Internet and connectivity
      • Internet of Things
      • Investment
      • IT services
      • Motoring and transport
      • Public sector
      • Science
      • Social media
      • Talent and leadership
      • Telecoms
    • Advertise
    TechCentralTechCentral
    Home»In-depth»Cell C, MTN head to court over Neotel deal

    Cell C, MTN head to court over Neotel deal

    In-depth By Duncan McLeod5 October 2015
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn WhatsApp Telegram Email

    gavel-640

    Vodacom’s proposed R7bn acquisition of Neotel is facing yet more headwinds, even before the case gets heard by the Competition Tribunal in late November.

    TechCentral has learnt that Cell C and MTN have filed papers at the high court seeking the setting aside of communications regulator Icasa’s decision of 11 June 2015 to approve the deal (subject to certain conditions).

    The two operators’ legal manoeuvres come three months after Telkom filed papers at the high court arguing that the procedures Icasa used to approve the Neotel acquisition were “unlawful”. Telkom, too, wants the decision set aside.

    In Cell C’s founding affidavit, which TechCentral has in its possession, chief legal officer Graham Mackinnon argues that the way in which Icasa  phrased its approval of the Vodacom/Neotel transaction means it has, in effect, not attached any conditions it. “The approval was not, in its express terms at least, given subject to any conditions.”

    But it’s Icasa’s “failure” to determine the impact of consolidation of spectrum under Vodacom’s control would have on competition before approving the deal that lies “at the heart of Cell C’s review application”, Mackinnon says.

    He says the proposed change of control of Neotel’s spectrum licences — which was approved by Icasa — will change the competitive landscape dramatically.

    “It provides Vodacom with control (directly or indirectly) of an additional 90MHz of spectrum formerly assigned to Neotel. It will thus hold a 90MHz spectrum advantage over MTN and Cell C, its direct competitors,” he says.

    “Critically, Vodacom will control twice the amount of 1 800MHz band spectrum as the rest of the market and, uniquely, would get access to spectrum in the 800MHz band, which it did not have before,” he adds. All operators are keen for access to 800MHz as it will allow them to provide more widespread mobile broadband coverage at comparatively low cost.

    “From the perspective of Cell C and a number of other market participants, this advantage will have severe negative implications for competition in the South African telecoms market,” says Mackinnon.

    Vodacom will be able to “attract sufficient subscriber revenues away from other operators to prevent them from reinvesting significant profits into such improvements”.

    “In a relatively short period of time, operators such as Cell C will become less effective competitors and not capable of constraining Vodacom, even to the limited extent that they are able to now,” he says.

    “Consumers will be the ultimate losers as Vodacom will have no incentive to lower its prices and rivals such as Cell C and MTN will be forced to raise theirs to meet their increased costs.”

    The latest developments come against the backdrop of an apparent battle over powers and jurisdiction between Icasa and the Competition Commission.

    The Business Day newspaper reported on Monday that Icasa is not satisfied with the terms and conditions the commission wants imposed on Vodacom and Neotel for the deal to go ahead.

    Icasa, the newspaper said, has asked the commission for access to confidential documents to allow it to intervene in the regulation of the market. This has reportedly raised fears that highly sensitive information submitted by industry players to the Competition Commission could up in the hands of rival companies.  — © 2015 NewsCentral Media

    Cell C Competition Commission competition tribunal Graham Mackinnon Icasa MTN Neotel Telkom Vodacom
    Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn WhatsApp Telegram Email
    Previous ArticleFacebook in African satellite Internet JV
    Next Article Why I quit Android

    Related Posts

    Huawei, MTN to help build 5G-powered ‘smart mine’

    30 June 2022

    Clear the regulatory fog, ISPs urge Icasa

    30 June 2022

    E.tv: ‘We know we must vacate broadband spectrum bands’

    29 June 2022
    Add A Comment

    Comments are closed.

    Promoted

    Billetterie simplifies interactions between law firms and clients

    30 June 2022

    Think herding cats is tricky? Try herding a cloud

    29 June 2022

    How your business can help hybrid workers effectively

    28 June 2022
    Opinion

    Has South Africa’s advertising industry lost its way?

    21 June 2022

    Rob Lith: What Icasa’s spectrum auction means for SA companies

    13 June 2022

    A proposed solution to crypto’s stablecoin problem

    19 May 2022

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the best South African technology news and analysis delivered to your e-mail inbox every morning.

    © 2009 - 2022 NewsCentral Media

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.