Close Menu
TechCentralTechCentral

    Subscribe to the newsletter

    Get the best South African technology news and analysis delivered to your e-mail inbox every morning.

    Facebook X (Twitter) YouTube LinkedIn
    WhatsApp Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn YouTube
    TechCentralTechCentral
    • News

      A history of the decoders made by M-Net and DStv

      30 November 2023

      How South Africa’s banks became bakgat

      30 November 2023

      Putin’s daughter pursues digital plan in push to embrace Africa

      30 November 2023

      MTN slashes prepaid data prices: 200GB for R399

      30 November 2023

      Spar confident worst of ERP disaster now behind it

      30 November 2023
    • World

      ‘Go f… yourself’: Musk lashes out at fleeing advertisers

      30 November 2023

      Microsoft to take non-voting position on OpenAI board

      30 November 2023

      Hackers stole customer support data in Okta breach

      29 November 2023

      Orange withdraws from process to buy into Ethio Telecom

      28 November 2023

      Musk’s X hit by advertiser exodus

      27 November 2023
    • In-depth

      Africa has a feature phone problem

      23 November 2023

      Is your ISP monitoring your online activity?

      10 November 2023

      The real Big Brother Africa

      2 November 2023

      Compared: Starlink prices around the world – including Africa

      30 October 2023

      Africa is booming

      30 October 2023
    • TCS

      TCS+ | OneTrust’s Joseph Byrne: privacy risk management done right

      29 November 2023

      TCS+ | Ricoh – safe and secure role in today’s digital ecosystems

      27 November 2023

      TCS+ | NEC XON on going toe to toe with cybercriminals

      22 November 2023

      TCS | How ShotSpotter is fighting gun crime in Cape Town

      13 November 2023

      TCS+ | SOC-as-a-service: CYBER1 SOC and the future of cybersecurity

      13 November 2023
    • Opinion

      Could Cape Town become Africa’s Silicon Valley?

      14 November 2023

      Chris Kruger: What I learnt in my decades in IT leadership

      6 November 2023

      Ransomware attacks: how South African companies should respond

      6 November 2023

      Fibre providers urged to go ‘nano’ to cut costs

      31 October 2023

      Big banks, take note: PayShap should be free

      20 October 2023
    • Company Hubs
      • 4IRI
      • Africa Data Centres
      • Altron Document Solutions
      • Altron Systems Integration
      • Arctic Wolf
      • AvertITD
      • CallMiner
      • CoCre8
      • CYBER1 Solutions
      • Digicloud Africa
      • Digimune
      • E4
      • Entelect
      • ESET
      • Euphoria Telecom
      • iKhokha
      • Incredible Business
      • iONLINE
      • LSD Open
      • Maxtec
      • MiRO
      • NEC XON
      • Next DLP
      • Paratus
      • Ricoh
      • Skybox Security
      • SkyWire
      • Velocity Group
      • Videri Digital
    • Sections
      • AI and machine learning
      • Banking
      • Broadcasting and Media
      • Cloud computing
      • Consumer electronics
      • Cryptocurrencies
      • E-commerce
      • Education and skills
      • Energy
      • Fintech
      • Information security
      • Internet and connectivity
      • Internet of Things
      • Investment
      • IT services
      • Metaverse and gaming
      • Motoring and transport
      • Open-source software
      • Public sector
      • Science
      • Social media
      • Talent and leadership
      • Telecoms
    • Events
    • Advertise
    TechCentralTechCentral
    Home » Sections » Information security » Constitutional court bans bulk Internet surveillance in South Africa

    Constitutional court bans bulk Internet surveillance in South Africa

    By Duncan McLeod4 February 2021
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn WhatsApp Telegram Email

    In a landmark judgment handed down on Thursday, the constitutional court banned the South African state from bulk surveillance of online communication, preventing security agencies from hoovering up Internet data.

    This sort of surveillance, which is routinely done by agencies such as the National Security Agency in the US and GCHQ in the UK – both of which have routinely tapped into submarine Internet cables – is now illegal in South Africa thanks to the country’s highest court.

    The minister of state security had appealed an earlier high court judgment on the legality of bulk communication surveillance. The lower court had already declared bulk surveillance unlawful. The judgment by the constitutional court means the state has run out of legal options and any bulk surveillance is now unlawful and invalid.

    The minister of state security had appealed an earlier high court judgment on the legality of bulk communication surveillance

    The concourt held that section 2 of the National Strategic Intelligence Act of 1994 is ambiguous, and should be interpreted in a manner that best promotes the right to privacy, and does not contradict the prohibition of communication interceptions without interception directions contained in Rica, the legislation that governs the lawful interception of communications.

    Aspects of Rica — known formally as the Regulation of Interception of Communications and Provision of Communication-Related Information Act — are also unlawful, the concourt found.

    The legislation fails to provide adequate safeguards to protect the right to privacy, as buttressed by the rights of access to courts, freedom of expression and the media, and legal privilege, it said.

    Earlier ruling

    The judgment upheld an earlier ruling by the high court, which found in favour of investigative journalism outfit amaBhungane and journalist Sam Sole, who had been subjected to state surveillance without his knowledge or without being informed of the surveillance during or after the fact.

    The minister of police had argued for the continued prohibition of all post-surveillance notification but the constitutional court held that such a blanket prohibition facilitates the abuse of interception directions, which are applied for, granted and implemented in complete secrecy.

    “Even if a direction ought not to have been granted, the subject will never know and is thus denied the opportunity to seek legal redress for the violation of her or his right to privacy,” the court said in an explanatory note to the media. “This renders the rights guaranteed by sections 34 and 38 of the constitution to approach a court to seek appropriate relief for the infringement of the right to privacy illusory and promotes impunity. Post-surveillance notification would serve a purpose comparable to less restrictive means.”

    The court concluded that post-surveillance notification should be the default position. Rica is, as a result, unconstitutional in that it fails to provide for notifying a subject of surveillance as soon as this can be done without jeopardising the purpose of surveillance after it has been terminated.

    In addition, Rica was found to be in breach of the constitution to the extent that it fails to ensure adequate safeguards for an independent judicial authorisation of interception and to the extent that it lacks sufficient safeguards to address the fact that interception directions are sought and obtained on an ex parte (without the party present) basis. The court left the choice of what measures are most suitable to parliament to fix in the legislation.

    The legislation was also found to be unconstitutional to the extent that it fails adequately to prescribe procedures to ensure that data obtained pursuant to the interception of communication is managed lawfully and not used or interfered with unlawfully.

    The confidentiality of journalists’ sources is protected by the rights to freedom of expression and the media

    The court acknowledged that the confidentiality of journalists’ sources is protected by the rights to freedom of expression and the media. In relation to the confidentiality of lawyers’ communications, the court accepted that legal professional privilege is an essential part of the rights to a fair trial and fair hearing. These rights were found to weigh in favour of special consideration being given to the importance of the confidentiality of lawyer/client communications and journalists’ sources, in order to minimise the risk of infringement of this confidentiality. Rica’s failure to do so rendered it unconstitutional.

    Despite these findings, Rica will remain in force for a period of three years to allow parliament time to develop remedial legislation. However, given that the infringement of the privacy right is “egregiously intrusive”, and the period of suspension is relatively long (three years), the court deemed it necessary to grant interim relief in respect of the notification issue, and the lawyers’ and journalists’ issue.  — © 2021 NewsCentral Media

    amaBhungane Rica Sam Sole top
    Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn WhatsApp Telegram Email
    Previous ArticleCell C is playing the long game, by Douglas Craigie Stevenson
    Next Article NetFlorist sharpens gift production, delivery with Xerox Versant 180

    Related Posts

    A history of the decoders made by M-Net and DStv

    30 November 2023

    ‘Go f… yourself’: Musk lashes out at fleeing advertisers

    30 November 2023

    How South Africa’s banks became bakgat

    30 November 2023
    Promoted

    5G home broadband a big opportunity for African operators

    30 November 2023

    DCA, Huawei and WBBA host Africa Fibre Forum 2023

    30 November 2023

    Accelerate innovation with platform engineering

    30 November 2023
    Opinion

    Could Cape Town become Africa’s Silicon Valley?

    14 November 2023

    Chris Kruger: What I learnt in my decades in IT leadership

    6 November 2023

    Ransomware attacks: how South African companies should respond

    6 November 2023

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the best South African technology news and analysis delivered to your e-mail inbox every morning.

    © 2009 - 2023 NewsCentral Media

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.