TechCentralTechCentral
    Facebook Twitter YouTube LinkedIn
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn YouTube
    TechCentralTechCentral
    NEWSLETTER
    • News

      Sarb tells banks they should work with crypto exchanges

      18 August 2022

      Telkom muscles into banks’ turf with business loans

      18 August 2022

      iPhone 14 launch date targeted for 7 September

      18 August 2022

      Icasa moves to license more broadband spectrum

      17 August 2022

      Eskom to impose more load shedding

      17 August 2022
    • World

      China blasts US over ‘discriminatory’ Chips Act

      18 August 2022

      Tencent reports first-ever sales decline

      17 August 2022

      Chip makers are flashing a big warning for the global economy

      17 August 2022

      Semiconductor boom turns to bust

      16 August 2022

      Tencent plans to offload R400-billion Meituan stake: sources

      16 August 2022
    • In-depth

      Are you a chronic procrastinator? Read this!

      18 August 2022

      African unicorn Flutterwave battles fires on multiple fronts

      11 August 2022

      The length of Earth’s days has been increasing – and no one knows why

      7 August 2022

      As Facebook fades, the Mad Men of advertising stage a comeback

      2 August 2022

      Crypto breaks the rules. That’s the point

      27 July 2022
    • Podcasts

      Qush on infosec: why prevention is always better than cure

      11 August 2022

      e4’s Adri Führi on encouraging more women into tech careers

      10 August 2022

      How South Africa can woo more women into tech

      4 August 2022

      Book and check-in via WhatsApp? FlySafair is on it

      28 July 2022

      Interview: Why Dell’s next-gen PowerEdge servers change the game

      28 July 2022
    • Opinion

      No reason South Africa should have a shortage of electricity: Ramaphosa

      11 July 2022

      Ntshavheni’s bias against the private sector

      8 July 2022

      South Africa can no longer rely on Eskom alone

      4 July 2022

      Has South Africa’s advertising industry lost its way?

      21 June 2022

      Rob Lith: What Icasa’s spectrum auction means for SA companies

      13 June 2022
    • Company Hubs
      • 1-grid
      • Africa Data Centres
      • Altron Document Solutions
      • Amplitude
      • Atvance Intellect
      • Axiz
      • BOATech
      • CallMiner
      • Digital Generation
      • E4
      • ESET
      • Euphoria Telecom
      • IBM
      • Kyocera Document Solutions
      • Microsoft
      • Nutanix
      • One Trust
      • Pinnacle
      • Skybox Security
      • SkyWire
      • Tarsus on Demand
      • Videri Digital
      • Zendesk
    • Sections
      • Banking
      • Broadcasting and Media
      • Cloud computing
      • Consumer electronics
      • Cryptocurrencies
      • Education and skills
      • Energy
      • Fintech
      • Information security
      • Internet and connectivity
      • Internet of Things
      • Investment
      • IT services
      • Motoring and transport
      • Public sector
      • Science
      • Social media
      • Talent and leadership
      • Telecoms
    • Advertise
    TechCentralTechCentral
    Home»Opinion»Alison Gillwald»Digital equality: South Africa still has a long way to go

    Digital equality: South Africa still has a long way to go

    Alison Gillwald By Alison Gillwald7 March 2020
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn WhatsApp Telegram Email
    The author, Alison Gillwald, says free “lifeline” data won’t reduce digital inequality

    In Cyril Ramaphosa’s state of the nation address earlier this month, the president highlighted the fact that the Competition Commission had instructed mobile operators to adjust their pricing in a bid to reduce digital inequality in the country. He referred positively to interventions aimed at mitigating inequality.

    These are likely to have mixed outcomes.

    The commission’s decision to force mobile operators to remove the “poverty premium” on low-denomination, prepaid mobile bundles has been widely welcomed as something the telecommunications regulator should have done years ago.

    A large number of the beneficiaries of the lifeline service who are capable of paying for the service will get the welfare benefit

    The “poverty premium” refers to the fact that poor people pay more than wealthier people for data. This happens in two ways. Firstly, prepaid data in South Africa costs way more than post-paid or contract data per megabyte. Logically, the price for it should be lower because it’s being paid up front, but it isn’t. Secondly, the price of low-volume, small-value bundles, typically purchased by poor people, compared with the high-volume packages, usually purchased by wealthier users, are highly discounted.

    Even if this may, arguably, inhibit the kind of product innovation that brought people online by offering micro-products, the intervention in the market is warranted on public interest grounds. And it is likely to have the intended outcome of making data more affordable for the poor.

    The president also referred to the free “lifeline” data package — a certain amount of data daily at no cost, proposed by the commission. The premise for this is much like the free basic water policy in the country which gives household 6 000l before charges kick in.

    ‘Free data for all’

    The “lifeline” package was hailed on public talk shows as “free data for all”.

    But adopting this in the far more complex telecoms infrastructure market is likely to produce some unintended consequences. In particular, it won’t reduce digital inequality. In practice the “free” lifeline data package will be given to everyone with a prepaid Sim card (85% of the data market) as the administrative costs of identifying the needy to provide the subsidy to is too high.

    This will produce a classical free-rider problem. A large number of the beneficiaries of the lifeline service who are capable of paying for the service will get the welfare benefit.

    There is also considerable evidence that the costs of mandatory user subsidies are transferred to end users’ prices. Levies like this are not paid from operator surpluses. Instead, they are built into the cost of services. Unless tightly monitored and regulated, this in turn drives up the price of services for users.

    From a public interest policy perspective, cross-subsidisation is justifiable if the subsidy and cost allocation is transparent. And if the increased cost being paid by those online, for example, is used to subsidise the extension of networks or services to get the rest of the population online. This is what happened in classical universal service regulation to get networks extended into remote areas.

    But the lifeline subsidy does not bring more people online. It subsidises the cost of data for those who are already online — rich and poor. The lifeline subsidy may enable those who are already connected through smart devices to use data more optimally to enjoy the benefits of being connected, such as financial inclusion, information gathering and job-seeking, but it does not assist with bringing the 50% of South Africans who are offline, online.

    There are alternative ways of subsidising data and bringing people online. One example is providing free public Wi-Fi at all public buildings

    The commission focused on the negative impact of data prices on consumers. And there is certainly evidence that price affects usage — in South Africa usage is way below the average in similar-sized economies with less inequitable income distribution.

    In the Research ICT Africa After Access 2018 survey of 10 African countries, including South Africa, non-users said that the price of smart devices was at primary reason for people not being connected. For those that were connected the cost of data was identified as the reason for their sub-optimal use.

    This shows that reducing data prices without attending to the cost of the devices (and other problems once people are connected, such as the lack of digital literacy) does not redress digital inequality.

    Mirrored online

    There are other reasons, too. Analysis of the 2018 survey shows that access and use of the Internet, across all countries, including South Africa, is determined by education and the corollary indicator of income. The survey showed that education, income and locational inequalities are simply being mirrored online — arguably amplified — as the economic and social value of being digitally networked increases exponentially.

    There are alternative ways of subsidising data and bringing people online. One example is providing free public Wi-Fi at all public buildings. This would enable those who were unable to pay for airtime to go online by accessing a public Wi-Fi point. This was proposed in the South African broadband plan, SA Connect, but was never implemented in the manner and scale intended.

    With successful Wi-Fi initiatives at city level, price-sensitive users are increasingly supplementing the purchases of their low-denomination bundles with public Wi-Fi. In the 2018 After Access survey, in South Africa 32% of Internet users indicated that they used public Wi-Fi at least once a month.

    Policy needs to address the underlying human development challenges if people are to be equitably brought online

    Of course, those who could afford data services would also be able to access the free Wi-Fi. But they wouldn’t get in automatically. They would need to make the effort of getting to a free public access point, which price-sensitive users do.

    Another option is zero-rating public interest services. “Zero-rating” is when no price is charged for the data used to access and use an application or website. This is proposed by the commission for government, educational and other public interest websites.

    But this is sub-optimal. Ideally, zero rating such sites should be in addition to some free public Wi-Fi. The poor should also be afforded choice and the benefits of access to the open Internet.

    Policy needs to address the underlying human development challenges if people are to be equitably brought online as well as enabled to shift from meagre passive consumption, to transaction-cost-reducing online activities, and even to enhancing their well-being and livelihoods.

    Policies that don’t address these challenges will simply perpetuate existing inequalities.The Conversation

    • Written by Alison Gillwald, adjunct professor, Nelson Mandela School of Public Governance, University of Cape Town
    • This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons licence
    Alison Gillwald Competition Commission Cyril Ramaphosa top
    Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn WhatsApp Telegram Email
    Previous ArticleTech festival SXSW is cancelled
    Next Article Coronavirus: Second South African case confirmed

    Related Posts

    Sarb tells banks they should work with crypto exchanges

    18 August 2022

    Telkom muscles into banks’ turf with business loans

    18 August 2022

    iPhone 14 launch date targeted for 7 September

    18 August 2022
    Add A Comment

    Comments are closed.

    Promoted

    Entelek, A2pay to roll out 2 500 free Wi-Fi sites in South Africa

    18 August 2022

    Companies are drowning in data – but solutions are at hand

    18 August 2022

    Top cybersecurity challenge is inadequate identification of key risks

    17 August 2022
    Opinion

    No reason South Africa should have a shortage of electricity: Ramaphosa

    11 July 2022

    Ntshavheni’s bias against the private sector

    8 July 2022

    South Africa can no longer rely on Eskom alone

    4 July 2022

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the best South African technology news and analysis delivered to your e-mail inbox every morning.

    © 2009 - 2022 NewsCentral Media

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.