Close Menu
TechCentralTechCentral

    Subscribe to the newsletter

    Get the best South African technology news and analysis delivered to your e-mail inbox every morning.

    Facebook X (Twitter) YouTube LinkedIn
    WhatsApp Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn YouTube
    TechCentralTechCentral
    • News

      Cell C may list on the JSE as Blue Label eyes big restructuring

      16 May 2025

      Nvidia shares roar back to life

      16 May 2025

      5 000 fake DStv chargers seized, destroyed in Durban port bust

      16 May 2025

      Now Facebook wants to … scan your face

      16 May 2025

      Grok’s South Africa blunder raises alarms over chatbot oversight

      16 May 2025
    • World

      Microsoft to lay off 3% of workforce in organisation-wide cuts

      14 May 2025

      AI-voiced audiobooks are coming to Audible

      13 May 2025

      Apple turns to AI to tackle iPhone battery woes

      13 May 2025

      Vodafone CFO to step down

      7 May 2025

      Lights, camera, tariffs: Trump declares war on foreign flicks

      5 May 2025
    • In-depth

      South Africa unveils big state digital reform programme

      12 May 2025

      Is this the end of Google Search as we know it?

      12 May 2025

      Social media’s Big Tobacco moment is coming

      13 April 2025

      This is Europe’s shot to emerge from Silicon Valley’s shadow

      10 April 2025

      Microsoft turns 50

      4 April 2025
    • TCS

      Meet the CIO | Schalk Visser on Cell C’s big tech pivot

      13 May 2025

      TCS | Kiaan Pillay on fintech start-up Stitch and its R1-billion funding round

      7 May 2025

      TCS+ | Switchcom and Huawei eKit: networking made easy for SMEs

      6 May 2025

      TCS | How Covid sparked a corporate tug-of-war over Adapt IT

      30 April 2025

      TCS+ | Inside MTN’s big brand overhaul

      11 April 2025
    • Opinion

      Solar panic? The truth about SSEG, fines and municipal rules

      14 April 2025

      Data protection must be crypto industry’s top priority

      9 April 2025

      ICT distributors must embrace innovation or risk irrelevance

      9 April 2025

      South Africa unprepared for deepfake chaos

      3 April 2025

      Google: South African media plan threatens investment

      3 April 2025
    • Company Hubs
      • Africa Data Centres
      • AfriGIS
      • Altron Digital Business
      • Altron Document Solutions
      • Arctic Wolf
      • AvertITD
      • Braintree
      • CallMiner
      • CYBER1 Solutions
      • Digicloud Africa
      • Digimune
      • Domains.co.za
      • ESET
      • Euphoria Telecom
      • Incredible Business
      • iONLINE
      • Iris Network Systems
      • LSD Open
      • NEC XON
      • Network Platforms
      • Next DLP
      • Ovations
      • Paracon
      • Paratus
      • Q-KON
      • SkyWire
      • Solid8 Technologies
      • Tenable
      • Vertiv
      • Videri Digital
      • Wipro
      • Workday
    • Sections
      • AI and machine learning
      • Banking
      • Broadcasting and Media
      • Cloud services
      • Contact centres and CX
      • Cryptocurrencies
      • Education and skills
      • Electronics and hardware
      • Energy and sustainability
      • Enterprise software
      • Fintech
      • Information security
      • Internet and connectivity
      • Internet of Things
      • Investment
      • IT services
      • Lifestyle
      • Motoring
      • Public sector
      • Retail and e-commerce
      • Science
      • Social media
      • Talent and leadership
      • Telecoms
    • Events
    • Advertise
    TechCentralTechCentral
    Home » Investment » Hey Microsoft, can you lend your regulator a lawyer?

    Hey Microsoft, can you lend your regulator a lawyer?

    The fight between Microsoft and the UK competition watchdog is a battle of legal firepower and tactical nous. Guess who has the upper hand.
    By Chris Hughes7 July 2023
    Twitter LinkedIn Facebook WhatsApp Email Telegram Copy Link
    News Alerts
    WhatsApp

    The fight between Microsoft and the UK competition watchdog over the software giant’s pursuit of Activision Blizzard is no longer just an intellectual argument about how markets work. It’s a battle of legal firepower and tactical nous. Guess who has the upper hand.

    Microsoft and Activision are appealing the Competition and Markets Authority’s conclusion that the US$69-billion deal stifles innovation and can’t be fixed with tweaks. This was predictable, given the nature of the case and the protagonists’ proclivities. Yet the CMA is surprisingly unprepared.

    The regulator has tried to get appeal hearings pushed back. It claimed the playing field isn’t level. The software firms lined up seven top barristers long ago, whereas the CMA has struggled to assemble its legal team. There’s a deluge of evidence to process, and its resources are stretched.

    The thornier issue is the CMA’s refusal to accept Microsoft’s suggested fixes

    Maybe Microsoft and Activision drained the well of leading advocates. Either way, the judge heading the tribunal threw out the CMA’s request. Indeed, he accused the CMA of failing to appreciate the overriding public interest in resolving antitrust disputes speedily. Ouch.

    Legal resources matter here because the arguments are finely balanced. The market in question is cloud gaming: streaming titles like Call of Duty online rather than downloading them to a PC or games console such as Sony’s PlayStation. Any assessment of a deal’s impact requires suppositions about the future of this form of gameplay.

    On paper, the CMA’s position is defensible. The agency is allowed to use discretion in reaching merger decisions. That’s like having a 10-point lead on Microsoft before entering the ring. Microsoft has to convince the tribunal that the CMA conducted its analysis in the wrong way or drew irrational conclusions from the evidence. That’s not easy.

    Hardly radical

    Moreover, the CMA’s fundamental concern is hardly radical. This is that Microsoft would have an incentive to limit distribution of Activision titles beyond its own cloud platform. Maintaining exclusivity would help the company attract gamers, in turn giving it an edge in securing quality content — a virtuous circle. This may not be a competitive advantage in isolation but becomes one in conjunction with Microsoft’s ownership of cloud infrastructure and the Windows operating system, the argument goes.

    Microsoft questions these notions, including the idea that cloud gaming is a market distinct from console gaming (where the CMA reckons the deal wouldn’t cause harm). But the CMA is in good company. An in-depth probe by the European Commission also fretted that Microsoft could withhold Activision games from rival cloud distributors. Similar arguments underpin the US Federal Trade Commission’s litigation against the transaction.

    Read: Microsoft gets big boost in its effort to buy Activision

    The thornier issue is the CMA’s refusal to accept Microsoft’s suggested fixes. The watchdog’s European peer reckons these transform the deal into something that actually benefits consumers by providing options they don’t have today: gamers who buy Activision titles would be permitted to play them on non-Microsoft cloud platforms already lined up to stream the catalogue.

    The CMA acknowledges these benefits but doesn’t see them outweighing the deal’s downsides. The remedies risk standardising a cloud model whereby consumers purchase games licences and bring these to their chosen streaming service. Alternatives — say, where the streaming service buys games and rents them out — might struggle to gain traction.

    It’s unfortunate that the CMA has a stated aversion to so-called behavioural remedies (effectively promises of good conduct), which are what Microsoft is offering. That risks making its objections look ideological. The stance is probably too rigid. Nevertheless, it’s more credible in deals involving markets whose future is uncertain like this.

    We don’t know how the European Commission weighed the tradeoffs, as it hasn’t published its full reasoning. But as Zach Meyers of the Centre for European Reform argues, the CMA’s approach has the virtue of letting consumers decide what business models should prevail and “shows … more respect” for open markets.

    The CMA is on the back foot. Comments by Microsoft and Activision casting doubt on the attractiveness of UK investment have whipped up a political storm. The chancellor of the Exchequer has told regulators to understand their responsibilities for economic growth. The pile-on continues. Chemicals billionaire Jim Ratcliffe this week said a CMA block on one of his deals showed the agency was “increasingly hostile to business”.

    Read: Microsoft piles pressure on UK over blocked Activision deal

    Let’s hope the case will turn on its merits and not the size of each side’s legal spending. Obviously, losing the appeal would create huge issues for the CMA. But one lesson is already clear: the regulator must ensure it is capable of defending controversial decisions. After all this, it can’t shy away from making another bold call if the next big merger case demands one.  — Chris Hughes, (c) 2023 Bloomberg LP

    Get TechCentral’s daily newsletter



    Activision Activision Blizzard CMA Microsoft
    Subscribe to TechCentral Subscribe to TechCentral
    Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn WhatsApp Telegram Email Copy Link
    Previous ArticleE&, Orange weigh Ethiopia bids: sources
    Next Article SABC owed R44-billion in unpaid TV licences

    Related Posts

    Nvidia shares roar back to life

    16 May 2025

    Transform your contact centre into a strategic growth driver

    14 May 2025

    Microsoft to lay off 3% of workforce in organisation-wide cuts

    14 May 2025
    Company News

    Zoom Fibre’s mission: powering the economy with world-class internet

    16 May 2025

    Retailers: take back control of your tech stack with self-enablement

    15 May 2025

    Sigfox South Africa unveils next-gen asset intelligence for smarter logistics

    15 May 2025
    Opinion

    Solar panic? The truth about SSEG, fines and municipal rules

    14 April 2025

    Data protection must be crypto industry’s top priority

    9 April 2025

    ICT distributors must embrace innovation or risk irrelevance

    9 April 2025

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the best South African technology news and analysis delivered to your e-mail inbox every morning.

    © 2009 - 2025 NewsCentral Media

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.