Chinese technology companies including Huawei Technologies have expressed strong concerns to local regulators about Nvidia’s proposed acquisition of ARM, people familiar with the matter said, potentially jeopardising the US$40-billion semiconductor deal.
Several of the country’s most influential tech firms have been lobbying the State Administration for Market Regulation to either reject the transaction or impose conditions to ensure their access to ARM technology, the people said. Chief among their concerns is that Nvidia may force the British firm to cut off Chinese clients, they said, asking not to be identified discussing private deliberations.
China’s fear is that ARM — whose semiconductor designs and architecture are central to most of the world’s electronics from smartphones to supercomputers — will become yet another pawn in a US-Chinese struggle for tech supremacy. Nvidia is buying the British firm from Japan’s SoftBank Group, bringing it under American jurisdiction and theoretically threatening its cherished status as a neutral party in the chip industry.
Any review of the deal in Beijing is likely to be coloured by what it perceives as growing US attempts to contain its largest technology companies. It has the power to approve the deal because China is by far the world’s largest consumer of semiconductors, importing about $300-billion worth of chips annually. That dependence on foreign silicon may convince regulators there to try and wring major concessions from Nvidia to preserve the ARM relationship, for instance by keeping the business independent and separate.
A Huawei representative declined to comment. The Chinese regulatory agency didn’t respond to calls and a faxed request for comment. Nvidia representatives pointed to remarks this month from CEO Jensen Huang, who expressed confidence the deal will pass muster.
‘Complementary’
“As soon as we explain the rationale of the transaction and our plans, the regulators around the world will realise that these are two complementary companies,” Huang said at ARM’s developer conference. “The two companies being complementary when combined will create new innovations, which is good for the market.”
Nvidia’s record deal to buy ARM was always expected to encounter major hurdles from regulators in countries sparring over trade, as well as customers concerned the transaction will limit competition and unfairly favour ARM’s future owner. The Chinese watchdog has yet to view a formal application for approval, but the opposition there is likely to be fiercest given its reliance on American technology at a time of mounting US hostility. Beijing’s authority has proven fatal for at least one previous chip deal: Qualcomm gave up its pursuit of NXP Semiconductors in 2018 after failing to win approval from China over more than 21 months.
China has determined it must build its own world-class chip industry, given rising tensions with the US administration of Donald Trump. That goal is unlikely to be affected by the American elections in November, although the outcome may change the dynamics between the two countries and by extension the ARM review.
Nvidia is a major provider of processors for computers and high-end computing, pitting it against players from Intel to Qualcomm and Huawei. And ARM’s designs and instruction set — the code used by chips to communicate with software — are an integral element of phones, self-driving cars and billions of sensors. They’re also growing more essential for servers and laptops.
The Cambridge, UK-based company has thrived on its neutrality as the Switzerland of the industry: It licenses technology to hundreds of companies, competing with none of them. While the Nvidia acquisition threatens this, executives have argued it’s in their best interest to maintain ARM’s neutrality to avoid alienating potential customers.
The deal still needs sign-offs from China, the UK, the European Union and the US, a process that often requires government agencies to solicit or be open to comment from customers and competitors. Nvidia and ARM have said they’re confident they’ll get through it but it may take as long as 18 months to secure the necessary approvals. — (c) 2020 Bloomberg LP
