TechCentralTechCentral
    Facebook Twitter YouTube LinkedIn
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn YouTube
    TechCentralTechCentral
    NEWSLETTER
    • News

      Fixing SA’s power crisis is not complex: it simply takes the will to do better

      12 August 2022

      Consortium makes unsolicited bid for state’s 40% stake in Telkom

      12 August 2022

      Actually, solar users should pay more to access the grid – here’s why

      12 August 2022

      Telkom says MTN talks remain on track

      12 August 2022

      Analysis | Rain muddies the waters with approach to Telkom

      11 August 2022
    • World

      Tencent woes mount, even after $560-billion selloff

      12 August 2022

      Huawei just booked its first sales rise since US blacklisting

      12 August 2022

      Apple remains upbeat about iPhone sales even as Android world suffers

      12 August 2022

      Ether at two-month high as upgrade to blockchain passes major test

      12 August 2022

      Gaming industry’s fortunes fade as pandemic ends

      11 August 2022
    • In-depth

      African unicorn Flutterwave battles fires on multiple fronts

      11 August 2022

      The length of Earth’s days has been increasing – and no one knows why

      7 August 2022

      As Facebook fades, the Mad Men of advertising stage a comeback

      2 August 2022

      Crypto breaks the rules. That’s the point

      27 July 2022

      E-mail scams are getting chillingly personal

      17 July 2022
    • Podcasts

      Qush on infosec: why prevention is always better than cure

      11 August 2022

      e4’s Adri Führi on encouraging more women into tech careers

      10 August 2022

      How South Africa can woo more women into tech

      4 August 2022

      Book and check-in via WhatsApp? FlySafair is on it

      28 July 2022

      Interview: Why Dell’s next-gen PowerEdge servers change the game

      28 July 2022
    • Opinion

      No reason South Africa should have a shortage of electricity: Ramaphosa

      11 July 2022

      Ntshavheni’s bias against the private sector

      8 July 2022

      South Africa can no longer rely on Eskom alone

      4 July 2022

      Has South Africa’s advertising industry lost its way?

      21 June 2022

      Rob Lith: What Icasa’s spectrum auction means for SA companies

      13 June 2022
    • Company Hubs
      • 1-grid
      • Altron Document Solutions
      • Amplitude
      • Atvance Intellect
      • Axiz
      • BOATech
      • CallMiner
      • Digital Generation
      • E4
      • ESET
      • Euphoria Telecom
      • IBM
      • Kyocera Document Solutions
      • Microsoft
      • Nutanix
      • One Trust
      • Pinnacle
      • Skybox Security
      • SkyWire
      • Tarsus on Demand
      • Videri Digital
      • Zendesk
    • Sections
      • Banking
      • Broadcasting and Media
      • Cloud computing
      • Consumer electronics
      • Cryptocurrencies
      • Education and skills
      • Energy
      • Fintech
      • Information security
      • Internet and connectivity
      • Internet of Things
      • Investment
      • IT services
      • Motoring and transport
      • Public sector
      • Science
      • Social media
      • Talent and leadership
      • Telecoms
    • Advertise
    TechCentralTechCentral
    Home»Sections»Investment»Huge Group rubbishes market manipulation claim

    Huge Group rubbishes market manipulation claim

    Investment By Duncan McLeod16 March 2021
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn WhatsApp Telegram Email
    Huge Group’s James Herbst

    Huge Group CEO James Herbst on Tuesday rubbished a claim that the company used its share buyback programme to manipulate its share price higher ahead of its bid to acquire fellow JSE-listed firm, software services group Adapt IT.

    News24 reported late on Monday that Huge Group is being probed by the Financial Sector Conduct Authority (FSCA) after a shareholder lodged a complaint against it at the regulatory body. According to the report, the complaint was filed by Kerem Aksoy, the managing member of a US-based investment advisory firm called Glacier Pass Management.

    Huge was reportedly actively buying its own shares through December and into January – so much so, that most trades in the (often relatively illiquid) share were because of the buyback programme.

    We have had this repurchase programme in place for over a year and we have been attempting to complete it. It is still not completed

    The insinuation is that Huge Group manipulated the share price, which rose by about 40% over a six-week period, to make it more feasible to launch its all-share offer for Adapt IT.

    According to the News24 report, Aksoy has also filed a complaint with the JSE and has asked an independent board appointed by Adapt IT to consider the Huge Group offer to probe whether Huge was “artificially inflating or manipulating” its share price ahead of the offer being made public.

    But Herbst told TechCentral on Tuesday morning there is nothing sinister about the share buyback programme or the trades in December and January.

    ‘Nothing to do with Adapt IT’

    “We have had this repurchase programme in place for over a year and we have been attempting to complete it. It is still not completed. The repurchase programme has nothing to do with Adapt IT. It is an exercise in repurchasing shares that trade below intrinsic value, which we believe is in excess of R8.50/share,” he said.

    He added that Aksoy is suggesting that Huge Group has implemented what is called a “market corner”.

    “A market corner arises where a person, or group of persons acting in concert, buys up a substantial volume of a security, knowing that other market participants would be forced to buy from him, or them, at a higher price. A similar practice is known as an ‘abusive squeeze’, and arises where a person has a dominant position in the market and then seeks to use his or her control or influence to cause a shortage and so to create artificial prices,” Herbst said.

    “Having a substantial influence over supply, and thereby extracting elevated profits, is not of itself abusive; the abuse lies in cornering the market and then using it to distort the market. The key phrase is ‘knowing that other market participants would be forced to buy’. Huge Group is not forcing Adapt IT shareholders to accept the Huge offer.” — © 2021 NewsCentral Media

    Now read: Huge Group sets out just why it’s pursuing Adapt IT

    Adapt IT Financial Sector Conduct Authority FSCA Huge Group James Herbst top
    Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn WhatsApp Telegram Email
    Previous ArticleEskom needs private power generation to avoid years of load shedding
    Next Article Icasa open to out-of-court deal on spectrum auction

    Related Posts

    Fixing SA’s power crisis is not complex: it simply takes the will to do better

    12 August 2022

    Consortium makes unsolicited bid for state’s 40% stake in Telkom

    12 August 2022

    Actually, solar users should pay more to access the grid – here’s why

    12 August 2022
    Add A Comment

    Comments are closed.

    Promoted

    Get your brand in front of TechCentral’s amazing audience

    12 August 2022

    Pricing Beyond CMYK: printers answer the FAQs

    11 August 2022

    How secure is your cloud?

    10 August 2022
    Opinion

    No reason South Africa should have a shortage of electricity: Ramaphosa

    11 July 2022

    Ntshavheni’s bias against the private sector

    8 July 2022

    South Africa can no longer rely on Eskom alone

    4 July 2022

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the best South African technology news and analysis delivered to your e-mail inbox every morning.

    © 2009 - 2022 NewsCentral Media

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.