TechCentralTechCentral
    Facebook Twitter YouTube LinkedIn
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn YouTube
    TechCentral TechCentral
    NEWSLETTER
    • News

      E-commerce is killing shopping malls – but, curiously, not in South Africa

      29 June 2022

      E.tv: ‘We know we must vacate broadband spectrum bands’

      29 June 2022

      Eskom employees returning to work

      29 June 2022

      E.tv in stunning victory over minister in digital TV fight

      28 June 2022

      It’s official: stage-6 load shedding is here

      28 June 2022
    • World

      Pictures: Chinese spacecraft acquires images of entire planet of Mars

      29 June 2022

      Arm aims for leg-up in smartphone games with new chip tech

      29 June 2022

      Warnings of a final bitcoin ‘washout’

      29 June 2022

      Sony launches into PC gaming hardware

      29 June 2022

      Ether holds its breath for the Merge

      28 June 2022
    • In-depth

      The great crypto crash: the fallout, and what happens next

      22 June 2022

      Goodbye, Internet Explorer – you really won’t be missed

      19 June 2022

      Oracle’s database dominance threatened by rise of cloud-first rivals

      13 June 2022

      Everything Apple announced at WWDC – in less than 500 words

      7 June 2022

      Sheryl Sandberg’s ad empire leaves a complicated legacy

      2 June 2022
    • Podcasts

      How your organisation can triage its information security risk

      22 June 2022

      Everything PC S01E06 – ‘Apple Silicon’

      15 June 2022

      The youth might just save us

      15 June 2022

      Everything PC S01E05 – ‘Nvidia: The Green Goblin’

      8 June 2022

      Everything PC S01E04 – ‘The story of Intel – part 2’

      1 June 2022
    • Opinion

      Has South Africa’s advertising industry lost its way?

      21 June 2022

      Rob Lith: What Icasa’s spectrum auction means for SA companies

      13 June 2022

      A proposed solution to crypto’s stablecoin problem

      19 May 2022

      From spectrum to roads, why fixing SA’s problems is an uphill battle

      19 April 2022

      How AI is being deployed in the fight against cybercriminals

      8 April 2022
    • Company Hubs
      • 1-grid
      • Altron Document Solutions
      • Amplitude
      • Atvance Intellect
      • Axiz
      • BOATech
      • CallMiner
      • Digital Generation
      • E4
      • ESET
      • Euphoria Telecom
      • IBM
      • Kyocera Document Solutions
      • Microsoft
      • Nutanix
      • One Trust
      • Pinnacle
      • Skybox Security
      • SkyWire
      • Tarsus on Demand
      • Videri Digital
      • Zendesk
    • Sections
      • Banking
      • Broadcasting and Media
      • Cloud computing
      • Consumer electronics
      • Cryptocurrencies
      • Education and skills
      • Energy
      • Fintech
      • Information security
      • Internet and connectivity
      • Internet of Things
      • Investment
      • IT services
      • Motoring and transport
      • Public sector
      • Science
      • Social media
      • Talent and leadership
      • Telecoms
    • Advertise
    TechCentralTechCentral
    Home»Sections»Investment»JSE fines Ayo R6.5m over ‘false and misleading’ financials

    JSE fines Ayo R6.5m over ‘false and misleading’ financials

    Investment By Duncan McLeod27 August 2020
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn WhatsApp Telegram Email
    Iqbal Surve. Image c/o the World Economic Forum

    The JSE has publicly censured Iqbal Survé’s Ayo Technology Solutions and imposed a R6.5-million fine on the controversial technology group for being in breach of the listing requirements after publishing a series of “false and misleading” financial statements.

    The fine will be used in settlement of any future costs the JSE may incur through the enforcement of the listing requirements, the bourse said in a statement published on the stock exchange news service on Thursday.

    Though the fine concludes the JSE’s investigation into the company itself, current and former directors who served on the board during the period of the infringements are also under investigation.

    The fine and public censure come after Ayo made serious errors in its financial reports. According to the JSE, various events led up to this week’s announcement of the public censure and fine:

    • On 8 April 2019, two former executives of Ayo made statements under oath at a Public Investment Corp commission of inquiry that executives of the company were instructed to inflate its unaudited interim results for the six months ended 28 February 2018.
    • In light of the uncertainty around Ayo’s 2018 unaudited interim results and the accuracy of the financial information, in April 2019 the JSE instructed Ayo, through its auditor BDO Cape Incorporated, to conduct an “agreed-upon procedures” engagement and subsequently an audit of Ayo’s previously published unaudited interim financial statements for the six months ended 28 February 2018 and 2019.
    • Because of the engagement, management identified apparent shortcomings in Ayo, including not having a suitable amount of qualified staff in the finance team and inadequate financial controls in place to ensure the accuracy and completeness of financial information disseminated to the market.
    • Subsequent to the JSE’s instruction, Ayo published amended and corrected financial results going back to the 2018 interim financial period. Each of the financial statements published by Ayo contained adjustments and corrections to the previously published results and were restated to correct numerous material errors and omissions.

    “The errors and misstatements in the 2018 unaudited interim results were quantitatively and qualitatively material, resulting in Ayo having to restate its 2018 interim cost of sales, gross profit, operating expenses, investment revenue, profit after tax, inventories, deferred tax, provisions and other accounts of significance to its business and operations by as much as 50% in some instances, including a 4% decrease in gross profits,” the JSE said.

    “While the 2018 interim profit after tax decreased by 19%, the 2018 interim earnings per share decreased by 13% as a result of the corrections. Further, in correcting these errors, goodwill decreased by 11%, inventories decreased by 69% and provision liabilities increased by 61%.”

    Damning

    In a particularly damning section of its statement, the JSE said Ayo failed to subject the 2018 interim accounts and underlying documents to a “critical and thorough review, resulting in numerous line items in the statements of financial position, comprehensive income and cash flows containing material errors”.

    “At the time, the company did not have robust financial reporting procedures and processes to avoid these errors, resulting in the dissemination of financial information that did not comply with IFRS (accounting standards). Further, the company did not appear to have sufficient staff in the finance team, as well as staff possessing sufficient historical and technical knowledge of the company, to produce financial information that would provide a fair presentation of Ayo’s results to the market since its listing on the JSE in 2017.”

    Similar deficiencies were found in the group’s 2019 unaudited interim results, “mainly as a result of incorrect application of judgment, IFRS errors, inadequate financial reporting controls and review processes that contributed to misstatements in the interim financial statements”. These errors and misstatements were “quantitatively and qualitatively material, resulting in restatements to other operating gains, other operating expenses increasing by 23%, and the 2019 interim headline earnings per share decreased by 50%.”

    Then, for the 2019 reviewed full-year results, Ayo published a change statement on 31 January 2020, highlighting significant changes to its previously published numbers. The adjustments centred on financial instruments and complex acquisitions, incorrect classification of items and the incorrect calculation of headline earnings per share, the JSE said.

    Furthermore, Ayo incorrectly included non-cash items in the statement of cash flows, which had to be removed and adjusted for. In correcting these errors, Ayo’s other operating gains and expenses increased by 133% and 23% respectively, thereby affecting profits and decreasing the initially published reviewed earnings per share and headline earnings per share by 19%. The balance sheet position underwent significant changes between the review and audit, reflecting a decrease in goodwill of 29%, reserves of 43% and contingent consideration liabilities of 53%. The company also incorrectly included non-cash items in the cash flow statement and had to correct the cash flows relating to operating, investing and financing activities.

    Furthermore, on 31 January 2020, Ayo published its annual report, audited 2019 annual financial statements in which it “omitted numerous disclosure notes”.

    Ayo’s previously published financial information … was incorrect, false and misleading in material aspects

    “Ayo’s previously published financial information did not comply with IFRS and was incorrect, false and misleading in material aspects and this incorrect information was disseminated to shareholders, the JSE and the investing public.

    In response to the JSE’s statement, Ayo issued a statement of its own, also via the stock exchange news service, in which it said it accepts the findings of the investigation that it “failed to observe the highest standards of care in the dissemination of the financial information into the marketplace”.

    ‘Not fraudulent’

    “These aforementioned items have in fact been remedied and Ayo has fully co-operated with both the auditors and the JSE throughout this process,” it said.

    “Ayo’s board of directors understands that there is much room for improvement and remains committed to putting additional procedures and processes in place going forward in order to disseminate financial information which is accurate and complete.”

    It claimed that the errors and omissions referred to by the JSE were not “deliberate, fraudulent or intentional”. – © 2020 NewsCentral Media

    aYo Ayo Technology Solutions Iqbal Survé top
    Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn WhatsApp Telegram Email
    Previous ArticleMinister backs down, appoints sixth Icasa councillor
    Next Article Telkom relegates Cell C to fourth place in SA mobile

    Related Posts

    E-commerce is killing shopping malls – but, curiously, not in South Africa

    29 June 2022

    E.tv: ‘We know we must vacate broadband spectrum bands’

    29 June 2022

    Think herding cats is tricky? Try herding a cloud

    29 June 2022
    Add A Comment

    Comments are closed.

    Promoted

    Think herding cats is tricky? Try herding a cloud

    29 June 2022

    How your business can help hybrid workers effectively

    28 June 2022

    Hands off our satellite spectrum!

    27 June 2022
    Opinion

    Has South Africa’s advertising industry lost its way?

    21 June 2022

    Rob Lith: What Icasa’s spectrum auction means for SA companies

    13 June 2022

    A proposed solution to crypto’s stablecoin problem

    19 May 2022

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the best South African technology news and analysis delivered to your e-mail inbox every morning.

    © 2009 - 2022 NewsCentral Media

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.