Close Menu
TechCentralTechCentral

    Subscribe to the newsletter

    Get the best South African technology news and analysis delivered to your e-mail inbox every morning.

    Facebook X (Twitter) YouTube LinkedIn
    WhatsApp Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn YouTube
    TechCentralTechCentral
    • News

      The transatlantic race to create the first television

      20 June 2025

      Listed: All the MVNOs in South Africa – 2025 edition

      19 June 2025

      TCS | Tech, townships and tenacity: Spar’s plan to win with Spar2U

      19 June 2025

      WhatsApp founders hated ads – Meta is adding them anyway

      19 June 2025

      China’s car factories run cold as price war masks deep overcapacity

      19 June 2025
    • World

      Watch | Starship rocket explodes in setback to Musk’s Mars mission

      19 June 2025

      Trump Mobile dials into politics, profit and patriarchy

      17 June 2025

      Samsung plots health data hub to link users and doctors in real time

      17 June 2025

      Beijing’s chip champions blacklisted by Taiwan

      16 June 2025

      China is behind in AI chips – but for how much longer?

      13 June 2025
    • In-depth

      Meta bets $72-billion on AI – and investors love it

      17 June 2025

      MultiChoice may unbundle SuperSport from DStv

      12 June 2025

      Grok promised bias-free chat. Then came the edits

      2 June 2025

      Digital fortress: We go inside JB5, Teraco’s giant new AI-ready data centre

      30 May 2025

      Sam Altman and Jony Ive’s big bet to out-Apple Apple

      22 May 2025
    • TCS

      TCS+ | AfriGIS’s Helen Hulett on how tech can help resolve South Africa’s water crisis

      18 June 2025

      TechCentral Nexus S0E2: South Africa’s digital battlefield

      16 June 2025

      TechCentral Nexus S0E1: Starlink, BEE and a new leader at Vodacom

      8 June 2025

      TCS+ | The future of mobile money, with MTN’s Kagiso Mothibi

      6 June 2025

      TCS+ | AI is more than hype: Workday execs unpack real human impact

      4 June 2025
    • Opinion

      South Africa pioneered drone laws a decade ago – now it must catch up

      17 June 2025

      AI and the future of ICT distribution

      16 June 2025

      Singapore soared – why can’t we? Lessons South Africa refuses to learn

      13 June 2025

      Beyond the box: why IT distribution depends on real partnerships

      2 June 2025

      South Africa’s next crisis? Being offline in an AI-driven world

      2 June 2025
    • Company Hubs
      • Africa Data Centres
      • AfriGIS
      • Altron Digital Business
      • Altron Document Solutions
      • Altron Group
      • Arctic Wolf
      • AvertITD
      • Braintree
      • CallMiner
      • CYBER1 Solutions
      • Digicloud Africa
      • Digimune
      • Domains.co.za
      • ESET
      • Euphoria Telecom
      • Incredible Business
      • iONLINE
      • Iris Network Systems
      • LSD Open
      • NEC XON
      • Network Platforms
      • Next DLP
      • Ovations
      • Paracon
      • Paratus
      • Q-KON
      • SevenC
      • SkyWire
      • Solid8 Technologies
      • Telit Cinterion
      • Tenable
      • Vertiv
      • Videri Digital
      • Wipro
      • Workday
    • Sections
      • AI and machine learning
      • Banking
      • Broadcasting and Media
      • Cloud services
      • Contact centres and CX
      • Cryptocurrencies
      • Education and skills
      • Electronics and hardware
      • Energy and sustainability
      • Enterprise software
      • Fintech
      • Information security
      • Internet and connectivity
      • Internet of Things
      • Investment
      • IT services
      • Lifestyle
      • Motoring
      • Public sector
      • Retail and e-commerce
      • Science
      • SMEs and start-ups
      • Social media
      • Talent and leadership
      • Telecoms
    • Events
    • Advertise
    TechCentralTechCentral
    Home » Energy and sustainability » Karpowership licensing process ‘fatally flawed’, lobby group says

    Karpowership licensing process ‘fatally flawed’, lobby group says

    By Palesa Mofokeng20 August 2021
    Twitter LinkedIn Facebook WhatsApp Email Telegram Copy Link
    News Alerts
    WhatsApp

    Environmental lobby group The Green Connection is on record for objecting to floating power plants as a power-generating solution, and it has now told energy regulator Nersa that the electricity generation licence process is “fatally flawed”.

    It said this during its oral presentation at public hearings on Thursday.

    The Green Connection made these comments regarding the Karpowership SA electricity generation application, adding that the floating power plant has a potentially devastating impact on the marine environment as well as the livelihoods of local coastal communities.

    Our concern is that South Africans may be in for a massive shock and end up paying even higher electricity prices

    In March, mineral resources & energy minister Gwede Mantashe announced that eight preferred bidders were selected for the Risk Mitigation Independent Power Producer Procurement Programme (RMIPPPP) to reduce the country’s reliance on expensive peaking plants and fill the short-term electricity supply gap. These proposals included three gas-to-power “powership” projects to be located in Saldanha Bay in the Western Cape, Ngqura in the Eastern Cape and Richard’s Bay in KwaZulu-Natal.

    ‘Disturbing’

    The environmental justice organisation’s strategic lead Liziwe McDaid said: “Our submission highlights that information was redacted in the application process and is therefore incomplete. This is disturbing. Why the secrecy? Where is the transparency? What are these redactions hiding?”

    According to The Green Connection, the implications of Eskom having to sign a long-term (20-year) power purchase agreement (PPA), coupled with the implications of Nersa granting a long-term generation licence, are two of the major sticking points with the Karpowership SA proposal.

    “Our concern is that South Africans may be in for a massive shock and end up paying even higher electricity prices. The contract proposed with Karpowership SA is particularly alarming, since it could supposedly last for two decades. Twenty years can hardly be seen as an ‘emergency’ energy solution.”

    Section 10 of the National Energy Regulatory Act stipulates that every decision of the energy regulator must be taken within a procedurally fair process in which affected persons have the opportunity to submit their views and present relevant facts and evidence to Nersa. The Green Connection quoted this in its statement.

    McDaid argues that the redactions in information presented in the application process unlawfully restrict and disrupt the ability of interested and affected parties to analyse aspects of the application and obtain expert input.

    She says this becomes an obstacle for concerned citizens who want to submit their views to Nersa, based on facts and information relevant to the generation licence application.

    While renewables offer largely predictable tariffs, fuel-based projects shift the risk to Eskom

    The Green Connection says its submission includes an extensive list of critical issues that have been redacted, demonstrating procedural unfairness.

    This includes a summary of the PPA and any version of the PPA. Details of the contractual arrangements with Karpowership SA and its financial information, including projections regarding the proposed undertaking were also redacted.

    Three times higher

    McDaid also warns that given the risk of longer contracts for Eskom, especially when electricity is generated by burning fossil fuels, the tariff for electricity will be almost three times higher (R1.69kWh) with Karpowership SA.

    This compares to the most recent solar and wind projects contracted during the last renewable energy bid window (62c/kWh). She says that this low rate per kilowatt represents the benchmark for least-cost new electricity generation capacity.

    “While renewables offer largely predictable tariffs, fuel-based projects shift the risk to Eskom. This is because fuel is treated as a ‘pass-through’ cost, meaning that Eskom is potentially exposed to both fluctuating fuel prices and the rand-dollar exchange rate,” McDaid says.

    “This means if the price of fuel goes up, Eskom and the consumer pays more. The electricity generation landscape is likely to change significantly over the next 20 years, and a two decade lock-in represents a significant risk to Eskom and the country’s economy.”

    • This article was originally published on Moneyweb and is used here with permission


    Karpowership Karpowership SA Liziwe McDaid The Green Connection
    Subscribe to TechCentral Subscribe to TechCentral
    Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn WhatsApp Telegram Email Copy Link
    Previous ArticleNvidia’s $40-billion pursuit of ARM set for lengthy review
    Next Article SABC licenses ESPN content in challenge to MultiChoice

    Related Posts

    Karpowership deal is dead

    14 October 2024

    Massive blow for Karpowership in South Africa

    5 January 2024

    Eskom seeks green light to sign Karpowership deal

    16 December 2023
    Company News

    Why parents choose CambriLearn for online education

    19 June 2025

    Disrupt first, ask questions later – the uncomfortable truth about incident response

    18 June 2025

    Sage brings together HR leaders to explore the future of payroll and people management

    18 June 2025
    Opinion

    South Africa pioneered drone laws a decade ago – now it must catch up

    17 June 2025

    AI and the future of ICT distribution

    16 June 2025

    Singapore soared – why can’t we? Lessons South Africa refuses to learn

    13 June 2025

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the best South African technology news and analysis delivered to your e-mail inbox every morning.

    © 2009 - 2025 NewsCentral Media

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.