Close Menu
TechCentralTechCentral

    Subscribe to the newsletter

    Get the best South African technology news and analysis delivered to your e-mail inbox every morning.

    Facebook X (Twitter) YouTube LinkedIn
    WhatsApp Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn YouTube
    TechCentralTechCentral
    • News

      Cell C may list on the JSE as Blue Label eyes big restructuring

      16 May 2025

      Nvidia shares roar back to life

      16 May 2025

      5 000 fake DStv chargers seized, destroyed in Durban port bust

      16 May 2025

      Now Facebook wants to … scan your face

      16 May 2025

      Grok’s South Africa blunder raises alarms over chatbot oversight

      16 May 2025
    • World

      Microsoft to lay off 3% of workforce in organisation-wide cuts

      14 May 2025

      AI-voiced audiobooks are coming to Audible

      13 May 2025

      Apple turns to AI to tackle iPhone battery woes

      13 May 2025

      Vodafone CFO to step down

      7 May 2025

      Lights, camera, tariffs: Trump declares war on foreign flicks

      5 May 2025
    • In-depth

      South Africa unveils big state digital reform programme

      12 May 2025

      Is this the end of Google Search as we know it?

      12 May 2025

      Social media’s Big Tobacco moment is coming

      13 April 2025

      This is Europe’s shot to emerge from Silicon Valley’s shadow

      10 April 2025

      Microsoft turns 50

      4 April 2025
    • TCS

      Meet the CIO | Schalk Visser on Cell C’s big tech pivot

      13 May 2025

      TCS | Kiaan Pillay on fintech start-up Stitch and its R1-billion funding round

      7 May 2025

      TCS+ | Switchcom and Huawei eKit: networking made easy for SMEs

      6 May 2025

      TCS | How Covid sparked a corporate tug-of-war over Adapt IT

      30 April 2025

      TCS+ | Inside MTN’s big brand overhaul

      11 April 2025
    • Opinion

      Solar panic? The truth about SSEG, fines and municipal rules

      14 April 2025

      Data protection must be crypto industry’s top priority

      9 April 2025

      ICT distributors must embrace innovation or risk irrelevance

      9 April 2025

      South Africa unprepared for deepfake chaos

      3 April 2025

      Google: South African media plan threatens investment

      3 April 2025
    • Company Hubs
      • Africa Data Centres
      • AfriGIS
      • Altron Digital Business
      • Altron Document Solutions
      • Arctic Wolf
      • AvertITD
      • Braintree
      • CallMiner
      • CYBER1 Solutions
      • Digicloud Africa
      • Digimune
      • Domains.co.za
      • ESET
      • Euphoria Telecom
      • Incredible Business
      • iONLINE
      • Iris Network Systems
      • LSD Open
      • NEC XON
      • Network Platforms
      • Next DLP
      • Ovations
      • Paracon
      • Paratus
      • Q-KON
      • SkyWire
      • Solid8 Technologies
      • Tenable
      • Vertiv
      • Videri Digital
      • Wipro
      • Workday
    • Sections
      • AI and machine learning
      • Banking
      • Broadcasting and Media
      • Cloud services
      • Contact centres and CX
      • Cryptocurrencies
      • Education and skills
      • Electronics and hardware
      • Energy and sustainability
      • Enterprise software
      • Fintech
      • Information security
      • Internet and connectivity
      • Internet of Things
      • Investment
      • IT services
      • Lifestyle
      • Motoring
      • Public sector
      • Retail and e-commerce
      • Science
      • Social media
      • Talent and leadership
      • Telecoms
    • Events
    • Advertise
    TechCentralTechCentral
    Home » Social media » Massive brand value destruction at Twitter

    Massive brand value destruction at Twitter

    It’s rare for corporate brands to become verbs. It’s rarer still for the owner of such a brand to announce plans to intentionally destroy it.
    By Agency Staff25 July 2023
    Twitter LinkedIn Facebook WhatsApp Email Telegram Copy Link
    News Alerts
    WhatsApp

    It’s rare for corporate brands to become so intertwined with everyday conversation that they become verbs. It’s rarer still for the owner of such a brand to announce plans to intentionally destroy it.

    On Sunday, in the middle of a quiet weekend, Elon Musk decreed that Twitter’s product name would be changed to “X”, and that he is getting rid of the bird logo and all the associated words, including “tweet”. Musk’s move wiped out anywhere between US$4-billion and $20-billion in value, according to analysts and brand agencies.

    “It took 15-plus years to earn that much equity worldwide, so losing Twitter as a brand name is a significant financial hit,” said Steve Susi, director of brand communication at Siegel & Gale.

    To me, it’s going to go down in history as one of the fastest unwinding of a business and brand ever

    Musk, whose company has already declined significantly in value since he purchased it for $44-billion in October, announced the change on Saturday night. By Monday morning a new black “X” logo, designed by a fan over the weekend, began to appear across the site. New CEO Linda Yaccarino outlined the company’s vision for X to become a site for audio, video, messaging, payments and banking.

    Analysts and brand agencies call the product’s renaming a mistake. Twitter is one of the most recognisable social media brands, said Todd Irwin, founder of brand agency Fazer. Bird decals adorn small businesses and websites worldwide, alongside Instagram and Facebook logos.

    Twitter’s popularity has also made verbs like “tweet” and “retweet” part of modern culture, used regularly to explain how celebrities, politicians and others communicated with the public, said Joshua White, assistant professor of finance at Vanderbilt University.

    X will require the company to rebuild that cultural pull and linguistic consensus from scratch. But that may be part of the motivation, so users stop comparing Twitter post-takeover to what it was before. “It’s an exceptionally rare thing — in life or in business — that you get a second chance to make another big impression,” Yaccarino tweeted.

    Brand

    Other tech companies have renamed themselves in recent years. Google turned into Alphabet to allow different businesses within the company to grow without being tied to search. Facebook changed into Meta Platforms to emphasise the company’s commitment to the metaverse. But the product names remained; we still google things by going to Google.

    That’s worth a lot. Twitter’s brand value is estimated at about $4-billion, according to brand valuation consulting firm Brand Finance. The firm values the Facebook brand at $59-billion and Instagram at $47.4-billion. Vanderbilt University estimates Twitter’s brand value at $15-billion to $20-billion, which is comparable to Snapchat.

    Brand valuation is difficult to determine, and there’s no single approach, which is why estimates vary, said Dipanjan Chatterjee, an analyst with Forrester Research. But several analysts and agencies agreed that the company’s brand has already taken a significant hit since Musk’s takeover. Brand Finance, for example, estimates the Twitter brand lost 32% of its value since last year.

    As the perception of Twitter’s brand has changed, advertisers have fled. Advertisers were concerned about Musk’s courting of controversy and embrace of tweeters who broke content rules. Advertising revenue at Twitter is down more than 50% since October, Musk has said.

    “Twitter’s corporate brand is already heavily intertwined with Musk’s personal brand, with or without the name X, and much of Twitter’s established brand equity has already been lost among users and advertisers,” said Jasmine Enberg, an analyst with Insider Intelligence.

    It’s “completely irrational from a business and brand point of view”, said Allen Adamson, co-founder of the marketing and brand consulting group Metaforce. He called it an “ego decision” on the part of Musk. “To me, it’s going to go down in history as one of the fastest unwinding of a business and brand ever.”

    There’s also the risk to Musk’s future goals. Building banking and payments into the app will require customer trust — something that’s difficult to get with a brand-new product name. “I just think that customers outside of Musk’s sort of core fan base would really struggle to use Twitter to exchange their money,” Vanderbilt’s White said.

    One thing working in Musk’s favour? “The Elon brand,” said Irwin. “His personal brand might be more powerful than the Twitter brand.”  — Aisha Counts and Jesse Levine, (c) 2023 Bloomberg LP

    Get TechCentral’s daily newsletter



    Elon Musk Linda Yaccarino Meta Platforms Snapchat Twitter
    Subscribe to TechCentral Subscribe to TechCentral
    Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn WhatsApp Telegram Email Copy Link
    Previous ArticleX marks the spot as Musk shoos away the birds
    Next Article Musk explains why he’s dumping the bird

    Related Posts

    Now Facebook wants to … scan your face

    16 May 2025

    Grok’s South Africa blunder raises alarms over chatbot oversight

    16 May 2025

    Elon Musk’s Grok eager to discuss ‘white genocide’ in South Africa

    15 May 2025
    Company News

    Zoom Fibre’s mission: powering the economy with world-class internet

    16 May 2025

    Retailers: take back control of your tech stack with self-enablement

    15 May 2025

    Sigfox South Africa unveils next-gen asset intelligence for smarter logistics

    15 May 2025
    Opinion

    Solar panic? The truth about SSEG, fines and municipal rules

    14 April 2025

    Data protection must be crypto industry’s top priority

    9 April 2025

    ICT distributors must embrace innovation or risk irrelevance

    9 April 2025

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the best South African technology news and analysis delivered to your e-mail inbox every morning.

    © 2009 - 2025 NewsCentral Media

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.