TechCentralTechCentral
    Facebook Twitter YouTube LinkedIn
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn YouTube
    TechCentral TechCentral
    NEWSLETTER
    • News

      Alviva shares leap higher on R3-billion take-private offer

      30 June 2022

      Datatec to sell Analysys Mason for as much as R4.1-billion

      30 June 2022

      Futuregrowth launches start-up fund, targets R600-million raise

      30 June 2022

      Eskom is killing the rand

      30 June 2022

      Eskom ramps up load shedding as crisis deepens

      30 June 2022
    • World

      Graphics card prices plummet as crypto demand dries up

      30 June 2022

      Bitcoin just had its worst quarter in a decade

      30 June 2022

      Samsung beats TSMC to 3nm chip production

      30 June 2022

      Napster plots crypto comeback

      29 June 2022

      Pictures: Chinese spacecraft acquires images of entire planet of Mars

      29 June 2022
    • In-depth

      The NFT party is over

      30 June 2022

      The great crypto crash: the fallout, and what happens next

      22 June 2022

      Goodbye, Internet Explorer – you really won’t be missed

      19 June 2022

      Oracle’s database dominance threatened by rise of cloud-first rivals

      13 June 2022

      Everything Apple announced at WWDC – in less than 500 words

      7 June 2022
    • Podcasts

      How your organisation can triage its information security risk

      22 June 2022

      Everything PC S01E06 – ‘Apple Silicon’

      15 June 2022

      The youth might just save us

      15 June 2022

      Everything PC S01E05 – ‘Nvidia: The Green Goblin’

      8 June 2022

      Everything PC S01E04 – ‘The story of Intel – part 2’

      1 June 2022
    • Opinion

      Has South Africa’s advertising industry lost its way?

      21 June 2022

      Rob Lith: What Icasa’s spectrum auction means for SA companies

      13 June 2022

      A proposed solution to crypto’s stablecoin problem

      19 May 2022

      From spectrum to roads, why fixing SA’s problems is an uphill battle

      19 April 2022

      How AI is being deployed in the fight against cybercriminals

      8 April 2022
    • Company Hubs
      • 1-grid
      • Altron Document Solutions
      • Amplitude
      • Atvance Intellect
      • Axiz
      • BOATech
      • CallMiner
      • Digital Generation
      • E4
      • ESET
      • Euphoria Telecom
      • IBM
      • Kyocera Document Solutions
      • Microsoft
      • Nutanix
      • One Trust
      • Pinnacle
      • Skybox Security
      • SkyWire
      • Tarsus on Demand
      • Videri Digital
      • Zendesk
    • Sections
      • Banking
      • Broadcasting and Media
      • Cloud computing
      • Consumer electronics
      • Cryptocurrencies
      • Education and skills
      • Energy
      • Fintech
      • Information security
      • Internet and connectivity
      • Internet of Things
      • Investment
      • IT services
      • Motoring and transport
      • Public sector
      • Science
      • Social media
      • Talent and leadership
      • Telecoms
    • Advertise
    TechCentralTechCentral
    Home»In-depth»More tough talk from Telkom on unbundling

    More tough talk from Telkom on unbundling

    In-depth By Editor13 October 2011
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn WhatsApp Telegram Email

    Telkom was combative in its presentation at the Independent Communications Authority of SA’s (Icasa’s) public hearings on local-loop unbundling on Wednesday. The company argued that unbundling wouldn’t necessarily help SA achieve its “developmental objectives” and that the process could prove counterproductive.

    Local-loop unbundling is the process that would allow other operators access to Telkom’s “last-mile” infrastructure. Telkom said there were a lack of guidelines explicitly laying out what form unbundling should take, and that Icasa was “conflating” stipulations about leasing network facilities with those concerning unbundling of facilities.

    It also suggested Icasa didn’t necessarily have the authority to decide on the process and its definition of unbundling, particularly the parts that referred to facilities leasing, including unfounded assumptions about what the process should entail.

    Telkom claimed that, despite suggestions to the contrary, unbundling would have a negative effect on the company because it incurred a loss by providing retail fixed-line services. This is known as the “access line deficit” and Telkom wants Icasa to consider this in its planning.

    However, Telkom refused to disclose the quantum of the deficit, saying Icasa already had the information at its disposal and it did not want to disclose it publicly.

    Icasa said price control regulations allowed Telkom to increase line rental rates more than it did in recent years and that if the access line deficit existed it wanted to know why the company elected not to increase fixed-line rentals by more than it did.

    Telkom said it opted to limit increases because of pressure from government to keep the cost of fixed lines down due to it being a barrier-to-entry for the unconnected.

    In its written submission to Icasa, Telkom said there were a number of “myths” around the unbundling process that it wished to “debunk”.

    The first “myth” was that its network has been paid for with taxpayers’ money. The operator said that although it inherited R12,8bn worth of buildings, network infrastructure and equipment when it was corporatised in 1991, it also inherited liabilities worth R14,3bn.

    It added that since 1991, it had invested more than R65bn in its network. This was despite having received only R4,4bn from government during the same period.

    Another “myth” was that Telkom’s copper network had already been paid off. It said the network required ongoing investment and maintenance and that the company depreciated its copper cables over 20 to 40 years.

    The suggestion that local-loop unbundling would increase broadband penetration in underserviced areas was yet another “myth”. It argued that unbundling was of no use or benefit to areas that didn’t have existing infrastructure and that it would discourage the company from building fixed-line access networks in those areas.

    Telkom also argued that there was a commonly held but incorrect assumption that the implementation of local-loop unbundling was a simple process that could be done quickly and would create jobs.

    It said it employed three to four times as many people than the country’s two largest mobile operators and that were unbundling to reduce its revenues it was possible it would have “no alternative but to review its workforce size”.  — Craig Wilson, TechCentral

    • See also: Icasa halts public hearings as Telkom goes on attack
    • Top image: Peter Baker
    • Subscribe to our free daily newsletter
    • Follow us on Twitter or on Facebook
    • Visit our sister website, SportsCentral (still in beta)
    Icasa Telkom
    Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn WhatsApp Telegram Email
    Previous ArticleM-Net posturing poses threat to migration
    Next Article Something has to give in fixed-line broadband – IS

    Related Posts

    Clear the regulatory fog, ISPs urge Icasa

    30 June 2022

    The NFT party is over

    30 June 2022

    E.tv: ‘We know we must vacate broadband spectrum bands’

    29 June 2022
    Add A Comment

    Comments are closed.

    Promoted

    Billetterie simplifies interactions between law firms and clients

    30 June 2022

    Think herding cats is tricky? Try herding a cloud

    29 June 2022

    How your business can help hybrid workers effectively

    28 June 2022
    Opinion

    Has South Africa’s advertising industry lost its way?

    21 June 2022

    Rob Lith: What Icasa’s spectrum auction means for SA companies

    13 June 2022

    A proposed solution to crypto’s stablecoin problem

    19 May 2022

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the best South African technology news and analysis delivered to your e-mail inbox every morning.

    © 2009 - 2022 NewsCentral Media

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.