TechCentralTechCentral
    Facebook Twitter YouTube LinkedIn
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn YouTube
    TechCentralTechCentral
    NEWSLETTER
    • News

      Fixing SA’s power crisis is not complex: it simply takes the will to do better

      12 August 2022

      Consortium makes unsolicited bid for state’s 40% stake in Telkom

      12 August 2022

      Actually, solar users should pay more to access the grid – here’s why

      12 August 2022

      Telkom says MTN talks remain on track

      12 August 2022

      Analysis | Rain muddies the waters with approach to Telkom

      11 August 2022
    • World

      Tencent woes mount, even after $560-billion selloff

      12 August 2022

      Huawei just booked its first sales rise since US blacklisting

      12 August 2022

      Apple remains upbeat about iPhone sales even as Android world suffers

      12 August 2022

      Ether at two-month high as upgrade to blockchain passes major test

      12 August 2022

      Gaming industry’s fortunes fade as pandemic ends

      11 August 2022
    • In-depth

      African unicorn Flutterwave battles fires on multiple fronts

      11 August 2022

      The length of Earth’s days has been increasing – and no one knows why

      7 August 2022

      As Facebook fades, the Mad Men of advertising stage a comeback

      2 August 2022

      Crypto breaks the rules. That’s the point

      27 July 2022

      E-mail scams are getting chillingly personal

      17 July 2022
    • Podcasts

      Qush on infosec: why prevention is always better than cure

      11 August 2022

      e4’s Adri Führi on encouraging more women into tech careers

      10 August 2022

      How South Africa can woo more women into tech

      4 August 2022

      Book and check-in via WhatsApp? FlySafair is on it

      28 July 2022

      Interview: Why Dell’s next-gen PowerEdge servers change the game

      28 July 2022
    • Opinion

      No reason South Africa should have a shortage of electricity: Ramaphosa

      11 July 2022

      Ntshavheni’s bias against the private sector

      8 July 2022

      South Africa can no longer rely on Eskom alone

      4 July 2022

      Has South Africa’s advertising industry lost its way?

      21 June 2022

      Rob Lith: What Icasa’s spectrum auction means for SA companies

      13 June 2022
    • Company Hubs
      • 1-grid
      • Altron Document Solutions
      • Amplitude
      • Atvance Intellect
      • Axiz
      • BOATech
      • CallMiner
      • Digital Generation
      • E4
      • ESET
      • Euphoria Telecom
      • IBM
      • Kyocera Document Solutions
      • Microsoft
      • Nutanix
      • One Trust
      • Pinnacle
      • Skybox Security
      • SkyWire
      • Tarsus on Demand
      • Videri Digital
      • Zendesk
    • Sections
      • Banking
      • Broadcasting and Media
      • Cloud computing
      • Consumer electronics
      • Cryptocurrencies
      • Education and skills
      • Energy
      • Fintech
      • Information security
      • Internet and connectivity
      • Internet of Things
      • Investment
      • IT services
      • Motoring and transport
      • Public sector
      • Science
      • Social media
      • Talent and leadership
      • Telecoms
    • Advertise
    TechCentralTechCentral
    Home»Sections»Energy»Nersa kicks the Karpowership can down the road

    Nersa kicks the Karpowership can down the road

    Energy By Staff Reporter13 September 2021
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn WhatsApp Telegram Email

    With the 30 September deadline for financial close looming for controversial electricity generator Karpowership SA’s deal with the South African government, energy regulator Nersa kicked a hard discussion about the its generation licence down the road.

    Karpowership, a subsidiary of the Turkish Karadeniz Energy Group, was selected as one of the preferred bidders in the department of mineral resources & energy risk mitigation independent power producer programme (RMIPPP) in March.

    This programme is aimed as an emergency intervention in the current electricity supply shortage and the projects are supposed to come into operation around August next year to end load shedding.

    As the date drew closer, it was clear that the bidders would not be able to overcome several challenges in time

    When energy minister Gwede Mantashe announced the first preferred bidders in March, he set the “non-negotiable” deadline for financial close at the end of July.

    As the date drew closer, it was clear that the bidders would not be able to overcome several challenges in time and the deadline was shifted to the end of this month – 13 working days away.

    Karpowership SA proposes generating a total of 1.2GW of electricity on three floating power stations with a floating storage and regasification unit each, in the harbours of Saldanha, Richards Bay and Ngqura.

    This constitutes a major share of the 2GW scope of the RMIPPP.

    Approval

    It requires approval from the Transnet National Ports Authority, which is in the process of being corporatised as a subsidiary of Transnet amid serious concerns regarding its legal status.

    The Karpowership proposal has met with fierce resistance – from environmentalists who object to the use of fossil fuels and are concerned about the impact of the operations on marine life, as well as energy analysts who have questioned the wisdom of the 20-year power purchase agreement that would be concluded with Eskom. Eskom’s board is reportedly also reluctant to sign such an agreement.

    Critics also question the fact that the major infrastructure built – the floating units – will be lost to South Africa at the end of the 20 years as Karpowership will simply be able to take them to another harbour elsewhere in the world.

    Gwede Mantashe

    While Karpowership’s proposed unit tariff seems to compare favourably with that of other bidders who rely heavily on renewable energy, it will fluctuate with the international gas price as well as the rand/dollar exchange rate. This poses a huge risk to the consumer, who will ultimately have to pay for the energy through power purchases tariffs.

    The company has already faced some headwinds, with the department of environment, forestry & fisheries first reversing its environmental approval and then, after a review, declining it. Karpowership has appealed, but it is not clear when the appeal process will be concluded.

    A competitor, DNG Energy, has challenged Karpowership’s selection as preferred bidder in court. DNG, which was disqualified, made allegations of corruption in the procurement process and hopes to replace Karpowership as preferred bidder. The high court in Pretoria last week postponed the case until November.

    Members of Nersa this past week differed sharply about the approval of Karpowership’s licences to generate electricity

    Energy expert Chris Yelland this week expressed his doubt whether the Karpowership projects can reach financial close before the court application has been finalised.

    Against this background, members of Nersa this past week differed sharply about the approval of Karpowership’s licences to generate electricity.

    Licence applications from seven of the preferred bidders were served before Nersa’s electricity subcommittee on Wednesday, 8 September. This committee normally deals with electricity matters on the basis of reports prepared by Nersa staff. They then make recommendations to the energy regulator meeting for final decision. Some of the members serve in both structures.

    Uncertain

    While the committee had no objections against the other applications, Nomfundo Maseti, full-time regulator member for piped gas (who also previously acted as member for electricity for an extended time), asked whether Nersa could entertain the Karpowership application while other approvals are still outstanding.

    She pointed out that Karpowership has not yet obtained a gas licence and therefore the source and price of the feedstock is still uncertain. She also referred to the outstanding environmental and harbour approvals and uncertainty about the conclusion of a power purchase agreement.

    Maseti asked for clarity about the sequence of regulatory approvals and Nersa’s role in the matter. “Are we putting the cart before the horses?” she asked.

    She emphasised that the Electricity Regulation Act requires the applicant to show its ability to generate power in terms of the licence it applies for and the plan showing how it will do so.

    She also asked about an earlier legal opinion Nersa got from senior counsel stating that the regulator must have the information it bases its decision on before it when taking the decision.

    Although less vocal, some of the other regulator members had the same concerns.

    Investors need the generation licence approval to obtain finance and Nersa should not add to their difficulty

    Nhlanhla Gumede, full-time member for electricity, who chaired the meeting, cautioned members to stick to Nersa’s mandate. He said while a number of regulators have to give different approvals, Nersa should stick to its mandate and leave the other matters to those regulators.

    “That is the guidance I gave to the team (of officials)”, he said. He added that the South African environment is extremely difficult for investors. They need the generation licence approval to obtain finance and Nersa should not add to their difficulty.

    Gumede said the gas supply will follow once the demand has been created by the Karpowership projects.

    Deadline

    Nersa’s internal legal advice supported Gumede’s position and the committee was advised that Karpowership had shown that it made the necessary applications to other regulators.

    Maseti eventually agreed to support a positive recommendation regarding the Karpowership applications to the regulator, provided that the legal opinion she referred to is be made available at the meeting.

    It is not clear when the regulator meeting will be scheduled. While it is usually close to the end of the month, an earlier special meeting may be scheduled in light of the looming financial close deadline.

    • This article was originally published by Moneyweb
    Gwede Mantashe Karpowership Karpowership SA Nersa top
    Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn WhatsApp Telegram Email
    Previous ArticleBusinesses want South Africa removed from UK Covid red list
    Next Article Vodacom details structure for Ethiopia venture

    Related Posts

    Fixing SA’s power crisis is not complex: it simply takes the will to do better

    12 August 2022

    Consortium makes unsolicited bid for state’s 40% stake in Telkom

    12 August 2022

    Actually, solar users should pay more to access the grid – here’s why

    12 August 2022
    Add A Comment

    Comments are closed.

    Promoted

    Get your brand in front of TechCentral’s amazing audience

    12 August 2022

    Pricing Beyond CMYK: printers answer the FAQs

    11 August 2022

    How secure is your cloud?

    10 August 2022
    Opinion

    No reason South Africa should have a shortage of electricity: Ramaphosa

    11 July 2022

    Ntshavheni’s bias against the private sector

    8 July 2022

    South Africa can no longer rely on Eskom alone

    4 July 2022

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the best South African technology news and analysis delivered to your e-mail inbox every morning.

    © 2009 - 2022 NewsCentral Media

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.