TechCentralTechCentral
    Facebook Twitter YouTube LinkedIn
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn YouTube
    TechCentral TechCentral
    NEWSLETTER
    • News

      Floods blamed as gov’t falls behind in set-top box roll-out

      24 June 2022

      Vumacam announces big Jo’burg expansion drive

      24 June 2022

      Eskom crisis spirals: stage-4 power cuts this weekend

      24 June 2022

      Illegal strike at Eskom could make load shedding worse

      24 June 2022

      State capture probe ends but South Africa remains ‘broken’ by corruption

      23 June 2022
    • World

      Amazon has a plan to make Alexa mimic anyone’s voice

      24 June 2022

      Apple, Android phones hacked by Italian spyware

      24 June 2022

      Zendesk nears buyout deal with private equity firms

      24 June 2022

      Crypto crash survivors could become ‘tomorrow’s Amazons’

      23 June 2022

      Tether to launch a stablecoin tied to the British pound

      22 June 2022
    • In-depth

      The great crypto crash: the fallout, and what happens next

      22 June 2022

      Goodbye, Internet Explorer – you really won’t be missed

      19 June 2022

      Oracle’s database dominance threatened by rise of cloud-first rivals

      13 June 2022

      Everything Apple announced at WWDC – in less than 500 words

      7 June 2022

      Sheryl Sandberg’s ad empire leaves a complicated legacy

      2 June 2022
    • Podcasts

      How your organisation can triage its information security risk

      22 June 2022

      Everything PC S01E06 – ‘Apple Silicon’

      15 June 2022

      The youth might just save us

      15 June 2022

      Everything PC S01E05 – ‘Nvidia: The Green Goblin’

      8 June 2022

      Everything PC S01E04 – ‘The story of Intel – part 2’

      1 June 2022
    • Opinion

      Has South Africa’s advertising industry lost its way?

      21 June 2022

      Rob Lith: What Icasa’s spectrum auction means for SA companies

      13 June 2022

      A proposed solution to crypto’s stablecoin problem

      19 May 2022

      From spectrum to roads, why fixing SA’s problems is an uphill battle

      19 April 2022

      How AI is being deployed in the fight against cybercriminals

      8 April 2022
    • Company Hubs
      • 1-grid
      • Altron Document Solutions
      • Amplitude
      • Atvance Intellect
      • Axiz
      • BOATech
      • CallMiner
      • Digital Generation
      • E4
      • ESET
      • Euphoria Telecom
      • IBM
      • Kyocera Document Solutions
      • Microsoft
      • Nutanix
      • One Trust
      • Pinnacle
      • Skybox Security
      • SkyWire
      • Tarsus on Demand
      • Videri Digital
      • Zendesk
    • Sections
      • Banking
      • Broadcasting and Media
      • Cloud computing
      • Consumer electronics
      • Cryptocurrencies
      • Education and skills
      • Energy
      • Fintech
      • Information security
      • Internet and connectivity
      • Internet of Things
      • Investment
      • IT services
      • Motoring and transport
      • Public sector
      • Science
      • Social media
      • Talent and leadership
      • Telecoms
    • Advertise
    TechCentralTechCentral
    Home»News»Parliament’s TV policy questioned in court

    Parliament’s TV policy questioned in court

    News By Agency Staff20 April 2015
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn WhatsApp Telegram Email
    Parliament in Cape Town
    Parliament in Cape Town

    Media houses and other parties are asking the Western Cape high court to find that a clause in parliament’s broadcasting policy is unconstitutional and invalid because it does not allow the public to view all activities on the floor.

    Steven Budlender, for the applicants, told a full bench on Monday that they were challenging the clause that dealt with coverage of unparliamentary behaviour and grave disorder.

    Media24, Primedia, the South African National Editors’ Forum and two other parties wanted the court to find this clause unconstitutional and invalid, and for parliament to be instructed to treat incidents of grave disorder in the same way as unparliamentary behaviour.

    They also wanted the court to find that the use of a signal jamming device during the state of the nation address in February was unlawful.

    Presently, the policy gives a broadcasting director the discretion to use occasional wide-angle shots during cases of unparliamentary behaviour.

    No provision is made for shots during a grave disturbance, and the policy does not define what is considered a grave disturbance.

    The parties had failed in their application last month for an urgent interim order enforcing uninterrupted audio and a wide angle shot of the chamber during disruptions, pending final relief.

    The application followed the eviction of Economic Freedom Fighters’ MPs from the house during President Jacob Zuma’s state of the nation address in parliament on 12 February, which was not broadcast.

    The parliamentary feed that day instead focused on speaker Baleka Mbete and national council of provinces chairperson Thandi Modise.

    Some journalists took cellphone footage of the incident, in contravention of the broadcasting policy, but could not file stories in the chamber because the signal seemed to be jammed.

    “What this court is asked to make a finding on is that it is inconsistent with our constitutional scheme for an incident with this importance to rely on a second-hand version of what happened,” Budlender said.

    “We didn’t get to see what happened on the floor of our parliament and we are therefore not able to make a proper judgement.”

    Budlender added that unparliamentary behaviour was often a contested question and involved people raising what they considered to be legitimate issues.

    The applicants were relying on the constitutional provisions of the right to freedom of expression and the openness of parliament.

    The court heard that there were already sufficient safeguards in place to ensure broadcasters properly handled the feed that parliament provided.

    Budlender argued that it was incorrect for the respondents to say that broadcasting an uninterrupted feed would compromise parliament’s dignity.

    “It doesn’t undermine the dignity of parliament for people to see. The public is entitled to, and needs to see, in order to assess it and make their own judgment calls.

    “We are unaware of any authority that says freedom of expression can be restricted because it makes such an institution looks bad.”

    Budlender said such a principle would be extraordinary in a constitutional scheme such as South Africa’s.  — News24

    Baleka Mbete Jacob Zuma Media24 Primedia Sanef
    Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn WhatsApp Telegram Email
    Previous ArticleSA gears up for digital radio
    Next Article Why francophone Africa lags in start-ups

    Related Posts

    Floods blamed as gov’t falls behind in set-top box roll-out

    24 June 2022

    Vumacam announces big Jo’burg expansion drive

    24 June 2022

    Eskom crisis spirals: stage-4 power cuts this weekend

    24 June 2022
    Add A Comment

    Comments are closed.

    Promoted

    Watch | Telviva One: adapting to the requirements of business

    24 June 2022

    Huawei P50 now available for pre-order in South Africa

    23 June 2022

    Calabrio paves way for SA’s cloud contact centre WFO journey alongside AWS

    23 June 2022
    Opinion

    Has South Africa’s advertising industry lost its way?

    21 June 2022

    Rob Lith: What Icasa’s spectrum auction means for SA companies

    13 June 2022

    A proposed solution to crypto’s stablecoin problem

    19 May 2022

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the best South African technology news and analysis delivered to your e-mail inbox every morning.

    © 2009 - 2022 NewsCentral Media

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.