TechCentralTechCentral
    Facebook Twitter YouTube LinkedIn
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn YouTube
    TechCentral TechCentral
    NEWSLETTER
    • News

      The great crypto crash: the fallout, and what happens next

      22 June 2022

      Winter 1, Eskom 0

      22 June 2022

      What it will take to bring the Guptas to justice

      22 June 2022

      Inflation in South Africa spikes higher

      22 June 2022

      Eskom announces massive escalation in load shedding

      22 June 2022
    • World

      Tether to launch a stablecoin tied to the British pound

      22 June 2022

      Tech giants form metaverse standards body, without Apple

      22 June 2022

      There are still unresolved matters in Twitter deal, Musk says

      21 June 2022

      5G subscriptions to top one billion in 2022: Ericsson

      21 June 2022

      Crypto lenders face a DeFi drubbing

      21 June 2022
    • In-depth

      Goodbye, Internet Explorer – you really won’t be missed

      19 June 2022

      Oracle’s database dominance threatened by rise of cloud-first rivals

      13 June 2022

      Everything Apple announced at WWDC – in less than 500 words

      7 June 2022

      Sheryl Sandberg’s ad empire leaves a complicated legacy

      2 June 2022

      Tulipmania meets the real economy at WhatsApp speed

      30 May 2022
    • Podcasts

      How your organisation can triage its information security risk

      22 June 2022

      Everything PC S01E06 – ‘Apple Silicon’

      15 June 2022

      The youth might just save us

      15 June 2022

      Everything PC S01E05 – ‘Nvidia: The Green Goblin’

      8 June 2022

      Everything PC S01E04 – ‘The story of Intel – part 2’

      1 June 2022
    • Opinion

      Has South Africa’s advertising industry lost its way?

      21 June 2022

      Rob Lith: What Icasa’s spectrum auction means for SA companies

      13 June 2022

      A proposed solution to crypto’s stablecoin problem

      19 May 2022

      From spectrum to roads, why fixing SA’s problems is an uphill battle

      19 April 2022

      How AI is being deployed in the fight against cybercriminals

      8 April 2022
    • Company Hubs
      • 1-grid
      • Altron Document Solutions
      • Amplitude
      • Atvance Intellect
      • Axiz
      • BOATech
      • CallMiner
      • Digital Generation
      • E4
      • ESET
      • Euphoria Telecom
      • IBM
      • Kyocera Document Solutions
      • Microsoft
      • Nutanix
      • One Trust
      • Pinnacle
      • Skybox Security
      • SkyWire
      • Tarsus on Demand
      • Videri Digital
      • Zendesk
    • Sections
      • Banking
      • Broadcasting and Media
      • Cloud computing
      • Consumer electronics
      • Cryptocurrencies
      • Education and skills
      • Energy
      • Fintech
      • Information security
      • Internet and connectivity
      • Internet of Things
      • Investment
      • IT services
      • Motoring and transport
      • Public sector
      • Science
      • Social media
      • Talent and leadership
      • Telecoms
    • Advertise
    TechCentralTechCentral
    Home»Top»Snap sparkles on debut, worth $29bn

    Snap sparkles on debut, worth $29bn

    Top By Agency Staff2 March 2017
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn WhatsApp Telegram Email

    Snap, maker of the disappearing photo app that relies upon the fickle favour of millennials, jumped in its trading debut after pricing its initial public offering above the marketed range.

    Shares opened at US$24 and traded as high as $25,42 apiece on Thursday, giving the company a market valuation of about $29bn (R380bn), based on the total number of shares outstanding after the offering in the deal prospectus.

    Snap sold 200m shares in its IPO at $17 each, above the $14 to $16 marketed range. Its market valuation at the IPO price, of about $20bn, implies a multiple of about 21,4 times eMarketer’s estimate for Snap’s 2017 advertising sales. Snap went public at a valuation at least twice as expensive as Facebook, and four times more costly than Twitter.

    “Snap presents investors with the opportunity to invest in the company behind an innovative, large-scale and distinctively young-skewing platform,” said Brian Wieser, an analyst at Pivotal Research Group. “Unfortunately, it is significantly overvalued given the likely scale of its long-term opportunity and the risks associated with executing against that opportunity.” He gives Snap a sell rating.

    Snap raised $3,4bn in its IPO, in the biggest social media IPO since Twitter more than three years ago. It’s also the first tech company to list in the US this year.

    After ringing the stock exchange’s opening bell on Thursday, CEO Evan Spiegel and co-founder Bobby Murphy headed to Goldman Sachs Group’s offices in lower Manhattan to await the first trade, according to a person familiar with the situation. Shares opened almost two hours later.

    Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley led Snap’s offering, and Goldman Sachs is also the stabilisation agent, tasked with ensuring the first day of trading goes smoothly.

    “There is a huge amount of people who really just want to get in on the hot new thing, who see this as the first opportunity of its type in a number of years,” David Kirkpatrick, CEO of Techonomy Media, said in an interview. Still, “they’ve got some serious work to do to actually make a real business that makes profits”.

    The company also needs to convince investors to put their complete trust in its management: it listed non-voting shares, the first company to do so in the US, according to its deal filing. That means stockholders will have no sway over things like director nominations and executive compensation, and they won’t be able to bring matters before the annual meeting. Co-founders and majority holders Spiegel and Murphy will be responsible for the decisions that lead to Snap’s success — or on the hook for its mistakes.

    Snap, which posted a net loss last year of $515m, even as revenue climbed almost seven-fold, has some things to prove. It needs to continue to increase revenue per user, address slower user growth — which fell below 50% in the fourth quarter for the first time since at least 2014 — and inch closer to profitability.

    Its advertising model is still evolving, with many brands using the platform to experiment with one-off campaigns before committing to longer term spending. While the advertising business has been built up from nothing in about two years, advertisers have said that the ad-buying process is still overly complicated. They’re also concerned about only being able to access a narrow demographic through Snap — its core user group of teens and 20-somethings.

    Facebook, with about 1,2bn active daily users on its flagship platform and 1,2bn on its messaging tool WhatsApp, trades at a multiple of about 10,5x revenue estimates for this year. Facebook’s Instagram introduced a video-reel feature — similar to Snapchat’s stories — that already has 150m daily users. That’s in line with Snap’s daily active count of about 158m.

    Facebook priced shares in its IPO at the top end of the proposed range in May 2012, then following a first-day trading technology glitch the stock climbed less than 1% and languished for more than a year. Once the company’s strategy of betting on mobile software started to pay off and revenue and profit exceeded estimates, it surged, and Facebook now has a market valuation of about $397bn.

    Twitter, with more than 300m monthly active users, comes in at 4,8x projected revenue. The social media site had an impressive debut, then proceeded to stumble as user growth slowed.

    Snap faces what those companies faced, with one proven product to date under its belt.

    The company offered the shares in its IPO for $14 to $16 each. Orders for the offering were concentrated at about $17 to $18 a share, people familiar with the process said on Tuesday. Demand outpaced the number of shares being offered by a multiple of 10, people familiar with the situation said.

    Including unexercised stock options and other convertibles for a total of 1,39bn fully diluted shares, Snap would have a fully diluted value of about $23,6bn, according to a person with knowledge of the matter, who asked not to be identified because the information is private.

    Given the interest, Snap could have priced the shares at $19 each, the person said, but executives wanted to ensure that shares would make a decent gain in their debut.  — (c) 2017 Bloomberg LP

    • Reported with assistance from Drew Singer
    Snap Snapchat
    Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn WhatsApp Telegram Email
    Previous ArticleBank of Baroda ‘closing’ Gupta accounts
    Next Article ‘Most challenging year in MTN’s history’

    Related Posts

    Tether to launch a stablecoin tied to the British pound

    22 June 2022

    Tech giants form metaverse standards body, without Apple

    22 June 2022

    There are still unresolved matters in Twitter deal, Musk says

    21 June 2022
    Add A Comment

    Comments are closed.

    Promoted

    More than card machines – iKhokha diversifies to reach more SMEs

    22 June 2022

    What does it cost to be a student in 2022?

    22 June 2022

    Rugged PCs bring AI to the edge in industrial settings

    21 June 2022
    Opinion

    Has South Africa’s advertising industry lost its way?

    21 June 2022

    Rob Lith: What Icasa’s spectrum auction means for SA companies

    13 June 2022

    A proposed solution to crypto’s stablecoin problem

    19 May 2022

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the best South African technology news and analysis delivered to your e-mail inbox every morning.

    © 2009 - 2022 NewsCentral Media

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.