Close Menu
TechCentralTechCentral

    Subscribe to the newsletter

    Get the best South African technology news and analysis delivered to your e-mail inbox every morning.

    Facebook X (Twitter) YouTube LinkedIn
    WhatsApp Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn YouTube
    TechCentralTechCentral
    • News

      Court battle brewing over contentious Joburg CCTV by-law

      7 July 2025

      Biometrics boss slams home affairs over R10 ID query fee

      7 July 2025

      TCS | Connecting Saffas – Renier Lombard on The Lekker Network

      7 July 2025

      Rain’s new Loop lets you carry your Wi-Fi and music everywhere

      7 July 2025

      Medupi unit 4 rejoins grid, easing winter load shedding fears

      7 July 2025
    • World

      Cupertino vs Brussels: Apple challenges Big Tech crackdown

      7 July 2025

      Grammarly acquires e-mail start-up Superhuman

      1 July 2025

      Apple considers ditching its own AI in Siri overhaul

      1 July 2025

      Jony Ive’s first AI gadget could be … a pen

      30 June 2025

      Bumper orders for Xiaomi’s YU7 SUV heighten threat to Tesla

      27 June 2025
    • In-depth

      Siemens is battling Big Tech for AI supremacy in factories

      24 June 2025

      The algorithm will sing now: why musicians should be worried about AI

      20 June 2025

      Meta bets $72-billion on AI – and investors love it

      17 June 2025

      MultiChoice may unbundle SuperSport from DStv

      12 June 2025

      Grok promised bias-free chat. Then came the edits

      2 June 2025
    • TCS

      TechCentral Nexus S0E4: Takealot’s big Post Office jobs plan

      4 July 2025

      TCS | Tech, townships and tenacity: Spar’s plan to win with Spar2U

      3 July 2025

      TCS+ | First Distribution on the latest and greatest cloud technologies

      27 June 2025

      TCS+ | First Distribution on data governance in hybrid cloud environments

      27 June 2025

      TCS+ | First Distribution on cloud cost management in Microsoft Azure

      26 June 2025
    • Opinion

      In defence of equity alternatives for BEE

      30 June 2025

      E-commerce in ICT distribution: enabler or disruptor?

      30 June 2025

      South Africa pioneered drone laws a decade ago – now it must catch up

      17 June 2025

      AI and the future of ICT distribution

      16 June 2025

      Singapore soared – why can’t we? Lessons South Africa refuses to learn

      13 June 2025
    • Company Hubs
      • Africa Data Centres
      • AfriGIS
      • Altron Digital Business
      • Altron Document Solutions
      • Altron Group
      • Arctic Wolf
      • AvertITD
      • Braintree
      • CallMiner
      • CambriLearn
      • CYBER1 Solutions
      • Digicloud Africa
      • Digimune
      • Domains.co.za
      • ESET
      • Euphoria Telecom
      • Incredible Business
      • iONLINE
      • Iris Network Systems
      • LSD Open
      • NEC XON
      • Network Platforms
      • Next DLP
      • Ovations
      • Paracon
      • Paratus
      • Q-KON
      • SevenC
      • SkyWire
      • Solid8 Technologies
      • Telit Cinterion
      • Tenable
      • Vertiv
      • Videri Digital
      • Wipro
      • Workday
    • Sections
      • AI and machine learning
      • Banking
      • Broadcasting and Media
      • Cloud services
      • Contact centres and CX
      • Cryptocurrencies
      • Education and skills
      • Electronics and hardware
      • Energy and sustainability
      • Enterprise software
      • Fintech
      • Information security
      • Internet and connectivity
      • Internet of Things
      • Investment
      • IT services
      • Lifestyle
      • Motoring
      • Public sector
      • Retail and e-commerce
      • Science
      • SMEs and start-ups
      • Social media
      • Talent and leadership
      • Telecoms
    • Events
    • Advertise
    TechCentralTechCentral
    Home » Ivo Vegter » Spectrum tradeability will make all Icasa’s problems disappear

    Spectrum tradeability will make all Icasa’s problems disappear

    By Ivo Vegter2 February 2022
    Twitter LinkedIn Facebook WhatsApp Email Telegram Copy Link
    News Alerts
    WhatsApp

    Telkom has once again obstructed the long-awaited auction of spectrum mobile operators desperately need to expand their broadband data networks. Were communications regulator Icasa to make spectrum tradeable, Telkom’s objections, as well as those of other telelecommunications operators, would evaporate like mist before the sun.

    It has been more than 15 years since the last time South Africa’s telecoms operators received access to any new radio frequency spectrum. At the time, 3G was still fast, the very first iPhone was not yet available in South Africa and 4G was only a prototype in Japan. Operators desperately need additional spectrum to provide new-generation, high-speed mobile data services.

    Read: Six firms apply for spectrum ahead of disputed auction

    Yet the road to auctioning high-demand spectrum in the International Mobile Telecommunications (IMT) radio frequencies, which includes bands that are supposed to be freed by the endlessly delayed transition from analogue to digital terrestrial television, has been long and arduous.

    Achieving affordable prices is not something governments know how to do

    The regulator, Icasa, is trying to balance a number of conflicting interests, not only among market participants, but also those imposed by the government’s SA Connect broadband policy.

    This policy is couched in terms of grand central-planning buzzwords, from “active citizens” to “decent work”, from “social cohesion” to “nation building”, and from “job creation” to “prioritising rural and underserviced areas and stimulating economic growth”.

    Key among these ambitions is to establish a government-run wireless open-access network (Woan) as a response to the perceived failure of markets to deliver widespread access to broadband services at “affordable” prices.

    Flawed Woan

    Of course, what constitutes an affordable price is entirely subjective: achieving affordable prices is not something governments know how to do. The market managed to offer 3G to 99.7% of the population and 4G to almost 90% of the population entirely without government help, and it would have got a long way towards offering even more widespread access to even better broadband services at even more affordable prices if it had received the radio spectrum with which to do so a decade ago.

    The entire Woan enterprise is unnecessary, is flawed, has failed everywhere it has been tried and should be scrapped entirely.

    The SA Connect policy proposes both “demand- and supply-side policy interventions” in a “four-pronged strategy” aimed at achieving fast, cheap and universal broadband.

    Read: Icasa appeals to Telkom to end litigation over auction

    It is similar to the government policy for delivering high-quality, cheap and universal electricity, drivers’ licences and postal services – and will meet with similar levels of success.

    The problem is that, no matter how many prongs it has, government intervention has never improved on the efficiency of markets. In the South African telecoms sector in particular, it has always led to reduced competition, exploitative value-extraction by hand-picked cronies, and low-quality, overpriced services for businesses and consumers.

    The author, Ivo Vegter, argues that the solution to the central-planning madness in awarding spectrum in South Africa is to make all spectrum in the IMT bands tradeable

    Because of all these competing policy and commercial interests, Icasa’s plan to auction off spectrum isn’t a simple matter of defining it and putting it up for sale. No, it’s far more complicated than that.

    It has put the Woan on the back burner for now, where all useless government projects go to moulder for five or 10 years, but this has raised valid concerns among existing operators that they cannot predict the Woan’s future impact on the market, and therefore cannot properly value the spectrum bands that are being auctioned.

    In an effort to appear “fair”, Icasa has determined that it should distribute spectrum not to those companies who would use it most effectively, but among as many market participants as possible.

    Read: Why Cyril is going after Telkom

    To this end, it has capped the maximum amount of spectrum any operator may own and has created a preferential round of bidding for small players or new entrants to get their hands on spectrum, without the risk of being outbid by “tier one” operators.

    Only MTN and Vodacom were designated as “tier one” operators, and would have to wait their turn at the auction until the rats and mice have finished their feast. Among these rats and mice, one can find Telkom which, despite being a mobile minnow, actually owns a third more spectrum than Vodacom or MTN.

    Most of those rats and mice will end up hawking their spectrum to the large mobile operators for roaming agreements

    MTN challenged this so-called “opt-in” round in court claiming, quite reasonably, that all the best spectrum would have been cornered by the time they got to bid.

    Most of those rats and mice will end up hawking their spectrum to the large mobile operators for roaming agreements regardless, while running bargain-bin network infrastructure themselves. This creates a layer of middlemen profiteers that reduce the quality and raise the price of products that will ultimately reach end users.

    Telkom has been the most consistently obstructive over the years and has been raising complaints on the exact opposite grounds: that the auction process will entrench the power of its larger competitors, that its larger competitors will be unfairly advantaged, and might even – heaven forbid! – get to upgrade their networks and improve their service to customers.

    Read: Ramaphosa orders wide-ranging probe into Telkom

    The former state-owned monopolist does not deserve any sympathy, but it does raise another important point: that the 700MHz and 800MHz bands, which are to be freed by the final switch-off of analogue television broadcasts, are currently encumbered by legal action by e.tv – which after being given notice 100 years ago is not yet ready for the transition to digital broadcasts.

    The provisions in the invitation to apply for spectrum run to 91 pages of complex bureaucratese, and even so, everyone has complaints, some of which are entirely valid.

    The solution to all this central-planning madness is simple: make all spectrum in the IMT bands tradeable.

    There’s probably no way one could convince the government not to auction it off at a fat profit to pay for VIP security and “security” upgrades at politicians’ houses, but if the spectrum is tradeable, at least an auction isn’t the final, irrevocable commitment that it otherwise would be, and wouldn’t entrench any operator at the expense of another.

    If spectrum sold at auction, either through outright ownership or long-term leases, remains tradeable, then it does not matter how spectrum is initially allocated. Market forces will in due course produce the most efficient allocation. Instead of everyone suing the regulator, they could just fight it out among themselves.

    If that strengthens major players in the market, so be it. Ultimately, it is the interest of customers that matters, and customer interests are not served by rigging the market or artificially sustaining smaller operators who exist only to lease their networks to the major players in any case.

    Tradability of spectrum also incentivises spectrum owners to use their spectrum more efficiently, to minimise interference with neighbouring bands, and to maximise the network performance extracted out of any particular sliver of spectrum.

    Impossible burden

    Most of all, it would remove from Icasa’s shoulders the impossible burden of keeping everyone including the ruling party socialists happy. It would invalidate most of the challenges against its auction process and turn its “invitation to apply” from a lengthy book of lawyer-bait into a simple notice it could publish as a small newspaper advert.

    Ultimately, businesses and consumers would benefit by putting a swift end to the endless rounds of litigation and not creating a layer of middlemen in the name of “competition”.

    Competition is not something a government can create. It is what happens when you set the market free.

    • Ivo Vegter, a former technology journalist and a columnist for the Institute of Race Relations, writes in defence of free markets and individual liberty. This article was commissioned by the Free Market Foundation


    Icasa MTN Telkom Vodacom Woan
    Subscribe to TechCentral Subscribe to TechCentral
    Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn WhatsApp Telegram Email Copy Link
    Previous ArticleHow corruption crippled Denel
    Next Article How Neotel buckled to Gupta corruption

    Related Posts

    Sasol, Vodacom team up to modernise Secunda operations

    4 July 2025

    Operators to decide 2G/3G shutdown timeline

    2 July 2025

    Vodacom’s influence on Maziv too strong to ignore: tribunal

    27 June 2025
    Company News

    Huawei launches next-gen fibre-to-the-room solution

    7 July 2025

    Remote monitoring tools: IT lifesavers or hacker gateways?

    7 July 2025

    The school placement crisis is getting worse

    7 July 2025
    Opinion

    In defence of equity alternatives for BEE

    30 June 2025

    E-commerce in ICT distribution: enabler or disruptor?

    30 June 2025

    South Africa pioneered drone laws a decade ago – now it must catch up

    17 June 2025

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the best South African technology news and analysis delivered to your e-mail inbox every morning.

    © 2009 - 2025 NewsCentral Media

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.