Close Menu
TechCentralTechCentral

    Subscribe to the newsletter

    Get the best South African technology news and analysis delivered to your e-mail inbox every morning.

    Facebook X (Twitter) YouTube LinkedIn
    WhatsApp Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn YouTube
    TechCentralTechCentral
    • News

      TCS | Reserve Bank fintech head Lyle Horsley on the G20 TechSprint

      22 May 2025

      Sam Altman and Jony Ive’s big bet to out-Apple Apple

      22 May 2025

      Former MTN bosses approach SA’s top court in Turkcell case

      22 May 2025

      iPhone designer Jony Ive to build AI devices with OpenAI

      22 May 2025

      Bitcoin smashes R2-million mark in record-breaking rally

      22 May 2025
    • World

      First AI-generated drugs could go on sale by 2030

      22 May 2025

      Google, Volvo deepen partnership on car software

      21 May 2025

      Microsoft pushes for industry standards in AI agent collaboration

      19 May 2025

      Microsoft to lay off 3% of workforce in organisation-wide cuts

      14 May 2025

      AI-voiced audiobooks are coming to Audible

      13 May 2025
    • In-depth

      South Africa unveils big state digital reform programme

      12 May 2025

      Is this the end of Google Search as we know it?

      12 May 2025

      Social media’s Big Tobacco moment is coming

      13 April 2025

      This is Europe’s shot to emerge from Silicon Valley’s shadow

      10 April 2025

      Microsoft turns 50

      4 April 2025
    • TCS

      TCS+ | Schneider Electric’s Clive Roberts on driving digitisation in the CPG sector

      22 May 2025

      TCS | Dalene Steyn on Capitec’s ambitious mobile gameplan

      21 May 2025

      Meet the CIO | Schalk Visser on Cell C’s big tech pivot

      13 May 2025

      TCS | Kiaan Pillay on fintech start-up Stitch and its R1-billion funding round

      7 May 2025

      TCS+ | Switchcom and Huawei eKit: networking made easy for SMEs

      6 May 2025
    • Opinion

      Solar panic? The truth about SSEG, fines and municipal rules

      14 April 2025

      Data protection must be crypto industry’s top priority

      9 April 2025

      ICT distributors must embrace innovation or risk irrelevance

      9 April 2025

      South Africa unprepared for deepfake chaos

      3 April 2025

      Google: South African media plan threatens investment

      3 April 2025
    • Company Hubs
      • Africa Data Centres
      • AfriGIS
      • Altron Digital Business
      • Altron Document Solutions
      • Arctic Wolf
      • AvertITD
      • Braintree
      • CallMiner
      • CYBER1 Solutions
      • Digicloud Africa
      • Digimune
      • Domains.co.za
      • ESET
      • Euphoria Telecom
      • Incredible Business
      • iONLINE
      • Iris Network Systems
      • LSD Open
      • NEC XON
      • Network Platforms
      • Next DLP
      • Ovations
      • Paracon
      • Paratus
      • Q-KON
      • SkyWire
      • Solid8 Technologies
      • Tenable
      • Vertiv
      • Videri Digital
      • Wipro
      • Workday
    • Sections
      • AI and machine learning
      • Banking
      • Broadcasting and Media
      • Cloud services
      • Contact centres and CX
      • Cryptocurrencies
      • Education and skills
      • Electronics and hardware
      • Energy and sustainability
      • Enterprise software
      • Fintech
      • Information security
      • Internet and connectivity
      • Internet of Things
      • Investment
      • IT services
      • Lifestyle
      • Motoring
      • Public sector
      • Retail and e-commerce
      • Science
      • Social media
      • Talent and leadership
      • Telecoms
    • Events
    • Advertise
    TechCentralTechCentral
    Home » Public sector » Supreme court to hear arguments on prisoners’ computer rights

    Supreme court to hear arguments on prisoners’ computer rights

    The supreme court of appeal is to hear arguments about the use of personal computers by prisoners.
    By Tania Broughton25 April 2023
    Twitter LinkedIn Facebook WhatsApp Email Telegram Copy Link
    News Alerts
    WhatsApp

    The supreme court of appeal is to hear arguments about the use of personal computers by prisoners.

    In two previous cases, judges have ruled that present policy, which prohibits or limits computer use, constitutes unfair discrimination. The minister of justice & correctional services is appealing against these rulings.

    The court documents were filed before revelations that Thabo Bester ran a scam business from his prison cell in Mangaung.

    The court documents were filed before revelations that Thabo Bester ran a scam business from his prison cell

    The supreme court will, later this year, hear arguments over whether prisoners in South Africa should be allowed to use their PCs in their cells in order to further their education.

    Present policy either prohibits or limits computer use by inmates who have registered to study. But in two previous matters, judges have ruled that this constitutes unfair discrimination. These rulings have now been taken on appeal by the minister of justice & correctional services, the national commissioner and the heads of the relevant prisons.

    All the papers were filed before the public revelations that Facebook rapist Thabo Bester had run a multimillion-rand scam business, using a laptop, from his cell at Mangaung Correctional Centre before he faked his death and escaped.

    Access to education

    Lawyers for Human Rights (LHR), which is representing one of the affected prisoners, said their case is concerned with the rights of those incarcerated to access education, which plays a significant role in their rehabilitation and preparation for re-entry into society. Their client, Mbalenhle Sydney Ntuli, secured an order in the high court in Johannesburg in September 2019 that he is entitled to use his PC, without a modem, in his single cell as long as he remains a registered student.

    The head of LHR’s penal reform programme, Nabeelah Mia, said the state had thus far been unable to prove well-founded security concerns to be specifically linked to having access to laptops. She said there were similarities between Ntuli’s case and that of Thabo Bester, and though LHR did not see major challenges during the hearing, the Bester case highlighted “the challenges that the department might need to take into account when establishing monitoring mechanisms”.

    Ntuli is serving a 20-year prison sentence for robbery. He registered as a student at Oxbridge Academy to do a data processing course.

    Initially he was authorised to use his computer in his cell for studying but after he was transferred to another section of the prison, he was told he had to study in the computer centre.

    Ntuli said since he was only allowed six hours outside his cell, during which time he had to shower, eat his meals and do his laundry, and since the computer centre was only open for limited hours, this limited his study time. The centre was also “noisy”, he said.

    The government respondents mainly raised the issue that to allow prisoners access to laptops in their cells would create a security threat — that inmates would smuggle modems into their cells or use illegal cellphones to create hotspots.

    But acting judge Molefe Matsemela said computers could be screened, and the respondents had not provided any evidence of security breaches. “They do not deny that the applicant has a right to further education.

    “Prisoners should be encouraged to obtain further education. Whereas previously the purpose of sentencing has been predominantly aimed at punishment, the importance of rehabilitation is now at the forefront. It is, after all, in the interests of society that ex-inmates are able to function fully in society,” Matsemala said.

    The second matter which the minister is appealing is a ruling — and subsequent dismissal of an appeal — in favour of Boeremag member Lets Pretorius and his two sons, Johan and Wilhelm Pretorius, giving them the right to use their PCs in their cells to study.

    In heads of argument, filed with the supreme court, LHR said the previous court rulings were correct: prisoners retain the constitutional rights of an ordinary citizen except for liberty rights that are a necessary consequence of imprisonment.

    The solution is to create a process through which correctional centre administrators may manage and supervise the use of computers in cells

    In the Ntuli matter, LHR said, the court set aside the prohibition on computers in cells in terms of the prison’s education policy “but otherwise left the policy intact, including all of its requirements and protections”.

    But the government appellants insist that the rulings have “opened the floodgates” without giving due consideration to security issues and the practicality and ability of correctional officers to monitor computer use, especially in communal cells.

    The Judicial Inspectorate of Correctional Services (Jics), has been admitted as amicus curiae (friend of the court).

    Director of legal services, Thembelihle Nhlanzi-Ngema said given the volume of complaints it has received about the issue, it was in the public interest to reach finality on the lawfulness of the education policy. “If the appeal succeeds, it may have dire consequences for inmates whose hard-won constitutional rights are potentially at stake.”

    JICS said the right to education is one of the substantial rights which may not be denied or limited and computers are a necessary tool.

    Recidivism

    “Access to education in cells improves mental and physical well-being. It increases the inmate’s chances of post-release employment, rehabilitation, personal development and autonomy, which reduces the risk of recidivism.”

    “The solution is to create a process through which correctional centre administrators may manage and supervise the use of computers in cells… It would be just and equitable for this court (the supreme court of appeal) to grant an order directing the minister to prepare a new policy in consultation with Jics.

    “Jics receives and processes complaints from inmates about their frustrations with obtaining approval for their use of personal computers. Jics is well situated to assist in preparing a policy that does not infringe on their constitutional rights.”

    A date for the hearing of the appeal has yet to be set.

    • This article was originally published by GroundUp and is republished by TechCentral under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Licence. Read the original article here


    Molefe Matsemela Thabo Bester
    Subscribe to TechCentral Subscribe to TechCentral
    Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn WhatsApp Telegram Email Copy Link
    Previous ArticleConvergence Partners invests in fintech trading platform
    Next Article Ramokgopa wants 15GW bid window for renewable energy
    Company News

    Top tech leaders back SAPHILA 2025

    22 May 2025

    What SA’s financial institutions must know about the new IT governance law

    22 May 2025

    The end of Windows 10 support is nigh – what you need to know

    22 May 2025
    Opinion

    Solar panic? The truth about SSEG, fines and municipal rules

    14 April 2025

    Data protection must be crypto industry’s top priority

    9 April 2025

    ICT distributors must embrace innovation or risk irrelevance

    9 April 2025

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the best South African technology news and analysis delivered to your e-mail inbox every morning.

    © 2009 - 2025 NewsCentral Media

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.