Close Menu
TechCentralTechCentral

    Subscribe to the newsletter

    Get the best South African technology news and analysis delivered to your e-mail inbox every morning.

    Facebook X (Twitter) YouTube LinkedIn
    WhatsApp Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn YouTube
    TechCentralTechCentral
    • News

      ‘System offline’ scourge to end, says Schreiber – but industry must pay

      23 June 2025

      Why the spectrum gold rush may soon be over

      23 June 2025

      Tech stability key to getting South Africa off damaging financial grey list

      23 June 2025

      Naspers shifts to an AI-first strategy – and it’s paying off

      23 June 2025

      Letter: South Africa risks missing AI wave while world surges ahead

      23 June 2025
    • World

      Watch | Starship rocket explodes in setback to Musk’s Mars mission

      19 June 2025

      Trump Mobile dials into politics, profit and patriarchy

      17 June 2025

      Samsung plots health data hub to link users and doctors in real time

      17 June 2025

      Beijing’s chip champions blacklisted by Taiwan

      16 June 2025

      China is behind in AI chips – but for how much longer?

      13 June 2025
    • In-depth

      Meta bets $72-billion on AI – and investors love it

      17 June 2025

      MultiChoice may unbundle SuperSport from DStv

      12 June 2025

      Grok promised bias-free chat. Then came the edits

      2 June 2025

      Digital fortress: We go inside JB5, Teraco’s giant new AI-ready data centre

      30 May 2025

      Sam Altman and Jony Ive’s big bet to out-Apple Apple

      22 May 2025
    • TCS

      TechCentral Nexus S0E3: Behind Takealot’s revenue surge

      23 June 2025

      TCS | South Africa’s Sociable wants to make social media social again

      23 June 2025

      TCS+ | AfriGIS’s Helen Hulett on how tech can help resolve South Africa’s water crisis

      18 June 2025

      TechCentral Nexus S0E2: South Africa’s digital battlefield

      16 June 2025

      TechCentral Nexus S0E1: Starlink, BEE and a new leader at Vodacom

      8 June 2025
    • Opinion

      South Africa pioneered drone laws a decade ago – now it must catch up

      17 June 2025

      AI and the future of ICT distribution

      16 June 2025

      Singapore soared – why can’t we? Lessons South Africa refuses to learn

      13 June 2025

      Beyond the box: why IT distribution depends on real partnerships

      2 June 2025

      South Africa’s next crisis? Being offline in an AI-driven world

      2 June 2025
    • Company Hubs
      • Africa Data Centres
      • AfriGIS
      • Altron Digital Business
      • Altron Document Solutions
      • Altron Group
      • Arctic Wolf
      • AvertITD
      • Braintree
      • CallMiner
      • CambriLearn
      • CYBER1 Solutions
      • Digicloud Africa
      • Digimune
      • Domains.co.za
      • ESET
      • Euphoria Telecom
      • Incredible Business
      • iONLINE
      • Iris Network Systems
      • LSD Open
      • NEC XON
      • Network Platforms
      • Next DLP
      • Ovations
      • Paracon
      • Paratus
      • Q-KON
      • SevenC
      • SkyWire
      • Solid8 Technologies
      • Telit Cinterion
      • Tenable
      • Vertiv
      • Videri Digital
      • Wipro
      • Workday
    • Sections
      • AI and machine learning
      • Banking
      • Broadcasting and Media
      • Cloud services
      • Contact centres and CX
      • Cryptocurrencies
      • Education and skills
      • Electronics and hardware
      • Energy and sustainability
      • Enterprise software
      • Fintech
      • Information security
      • Internet and connectivity
      • Internet of Things
      • Investment
      • IT services
      • Lifestyle
      • Motoring
      • Public sector
      • Retail and e-commerce
      • Science
      • SMEs and start-ups
      • Social media
      • Talent and leadership
      • Telecoms
    • Events
    • Advertise
    TechCentralTechCentral
    Home » News » Telkom on rapacious pricing: gov’t let us do it

    Telkom on rapacious pricing: gov’t let us do it

    By Editor21 October 2011
    Twitter LinkedIn Facebook WhatsApp Email Telegram Copy Link
    News Alerts
    WhatsApp

    Don’t blame Telkom for using its monopoly to strangle the local Internet sector — the government allowed it to.  This seems to be a recurring theme in Telkom’s defence of its rapacious pricing being heard by the Competition Tribunal.

    The telecommunications giant stands accused of abusing its dominance by charging excessive prices, refusing access to an essential facility and engaging in price discrimination, thereby making its downstream rivals less competitive.

    The hearing kicked off on Monday this week, with the first round running until 28 October, but Telkom’s witnesses were absent and are only expected to take the stand in the second round from 1 to 9 December.

    Behind the scenes at Telkom’s headquarters in Pretoria, head honchos were in negotiations with KT Corp (formerly Korea Telecom) to sell a 20% stake to the multinational.

    But Telkom’s answering affidavit gave some indication of how it would defend itself.

    Telkom legal adviser George Candiotes, who wrote the affidavit, said the “conduct of which the commission complains” was “justified by the relevant legislation”.

    In the affidavit, Telkom stated: “I shall indicate below that, in relation to the majority of the complaints contained in the complaint referral, the Telecommunications Act and the PSTS [public switched telephone service] licence justified the performance of the very conduct of which the commission complains.”

    Vans providers
    Telkom, according to the affidavit, felt that its monopoly, created following several roll-out obligations it accepted from the government when it was privatised, gave it the power to prevent value-added network service (Vans) providers from delivering some services.

    “Allowing Vans providers to take a share of the benefits of offering PSTS would have undermined the very essence of the regulatory deal,” said the affidavit.

    “It would have put Telkom in the position of earning less from its exclusivity rights than expected while still having to incur the costs of the obligations.”

    But it has been widely reported that Telkom did not meet those roll-out obligations.

    It has also been reported that SBC (now AT&T), Telkom’s American shareholder at the time, temporarily transferred its entire San Antonio corporate office legislative team to SA to help draft the Telecommunications Act, to make sure the legislation conformed to its requirements.

    In the affidavit, Telkom makes much of the time that has passed since the Competition Commission referred the case to the tribunal, arguing that the practices that were under the spotlight no longer existed.

    But it was Telkom itself who caused most of the delays.

    The case dates back to 2002 when a complaint was lodged with the commission by 21 entities, including the SA Vans Association, the Internet Service Providers’ Association and 19 other Vans providers.

    By February 2004, the commission had completed its investigation and referred its case against Telkom to the tribunal. But Telkom challenged the commission’s jurisdiction in the supreme court of appeal, a legal move that resulted in a five-year delay to the tribunal hearing, which Telkom ultimately lost.

    Several subsequent legal challenges followed based on the commission’s decisions to amend its papers, which have since been resolved, and the case finally reached the tribunal.

    The hearing kicked off with the testimony of Mike Brierley, a tele­coms consultant and former CEO of MTN Network Solutions. The Mail & Guardian understands that Brierley’s testimony is key to the commission’s case.

    On Wednesday, Telkom lodged objections to the tribunal hearing, arguing that the commission’s evidence was going beyond the scope of its initial complaint.

    The M&G understands that the tribunal is waiting for the commission to respond formally to Telkom’s objections before they are heard.

    When asked for comment on the tribunal hearing, Telkom spokesman Pynee Chetty said: “We don’t litigate in the media. We won’t comment before the hearing.”  — Lloyd Gedye, Mail & Guardian

    • Visit the Mail & Guardian Online, the smart news source
    • Subscribe to our free daily newsletter
    • Follow us on Twitter or on Facebook


    Competition Commission competition tribunal George Candiotes Korea Telecom KT Corp Mike Brierley MTN SBC Telkom
    Subscribe to TechCentral Subscribe to TechCentral
    Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn WhatsApp Telegram Email Copy Link
    Previous ArticleFNB: free phones, tablets next?
    Next Article Trade union wary of Telkom’s Korea talks

    Related Posts

    Listed: All the MVNOs in South Africa – 2025 edition

    19 June 2025

    MTN CEO edges Vodacom rival in pay stakes – but just barely

    18 June 2025

    TechCentral Nexus S0E2: South Africa’s digital battlefield

    16 June 2025
    Company News

    IoT connectivity management in South Africa – expert insights

    23 June 2025

    Let’s reimagine Joburg using the power of tech, data and AI

    23 June 2025

    Netstar doubles down on global markets while backing SA growth

    23 June 2025
    Opinion

    South Africa pioneered drone laws a decade ago – now it must catch up

    17 June 2025

    AI and the future of ICT distribution

    16 June 2025

    Singapore soared – why can’t we? Lessons South Africa refuses to learn

    13 June 2025

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the best South African technology news and analysis delivered to your e-mail inbox every morning.

    © 2009 - 2025 NewsCentral Media

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.