TechCentralTechCentral
    Facebook Twitter YouTube LinkedIn
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn YouTube
    TechCentral TechCentral
    NEWSLETTER
    • News

      Floods blamed as gov’t falls behind in set-top box roll-out

      24 June 2022

      Vumacam announces big Jo’burg expansion drive

      24 June 2022

      Eskom crisis spirals: stage-4 power cuts this weekend

      24 June 2022

      Illegal strike at Eskom could make load shedding worse

      24 June 2022

      State capture probe ends but South Africa remains ‘broken’ by corruption

      23 June 2022
    • World

      Amazon has a plan to make Alexa mimic anyone’s voice

      24 June 2022

      Apple, Android phones hacked by Italian spyware

      24 June 2022

      Zendesk nears buyout deal with private equity firms

      24 June 2022

      Crypto crash survivors could become ‘tomorrow’s Amazons’

      23 June 2022

      Tether to launch a stablecoin tied to the British pound

      22 June 2022
    • In-depth

      The great crypto crash: the fallout, and what happens next

      22 June 2022

      Goodbye, Internet Explorer – you really won’t be missed

      19 June 2022

      Oracle’s database dominance threatened by rise of cloud-first rivals

      13 June 2022

      Everything Apple announced at WWDC – in less than 500 words

      7 June 2022

      Sheryl Sandberg’s ad empire leaves a complicated legacy

      2 June 2022
    • Podcasts

      How your organisation can triage its information security risk

      22 June 2022

      Everything PC S01E06 – ‘Apple Silicon’

      15 June 2022

      The youth might just save us

      15 June 2022

      Everything PC S01E05 – ‘Nvidia: The Green Goblin’

      8 June 2022

      Everything PC S01E04 – ‘The story of Intel – part 2’

      1 June 2022
    • Opinion

      Has South Africa’s advertising industry lost its way?

      21 June 2022

      Rob Lith: What Icasa’s spectrum auction means for SA companies

      13 June 2022

      A proposed solution to crypto’s stablecoin problem

      19 May 2022

      From spectrum to roads, why fixing SA’s problems is an uphill battle

      19 April 2022

      How AI is being deployed in the fight against cybercriminals

      8 April 2022
    • Company Hubs
      • 1-grid
      • Altron Document Solutions
      • Amplitude
      • Atvance Intellect
      • Axiz
      • BOATech
      • CallMiner
      • Digital Generation
      • E4
      • ESET
      • Euphoria Telecom
      • IBM
      • Kyocera Document Solutions
      • Microsoft
      • Nutanix
      • One Trust
      • Pinnacle
      • Skybox Security
      • SkyWire
      • Tarsus on Demand
      • Videri Digital
      • Zendesk
    • Sections
      • Banking
      • Broadcasting and Media
      • Cloud computing
      • Consumer electronics
      • Cryptocurrencies
      • Education and skills
      • Energy
      • Fintech
      • Information security
      • Internet and connectivity
      • Internet of Things
      • Investment
      • IT services
      • Motoring and transport
      • Public sector
      • Science
      • Social media
      • Talent and leadership
      • Telecoms
    • Advertise
    TechCentralTechCentral
    Home»News»Telkom prevails in R1,7bn tender claim

    Telkom prevails in R1,7bn tender claim

    News By Editor19 January 2011
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn WhatsApp Telegram Email

    The north Gauteng high court has dismissed a case against Telkom, which could have seen the fixed-line operator pay up to R1,7bn to black-led telecommunications infrastructure provider Bihati Solutions.

    The case relates to a multibillion-rand tender Telkom put out in 2007 calling on contractors to help the company expand its network ahead of last year’s soccer World Cup.

    Bihati and five other companies were shortlisted as the “conditional” winning bidders for a deal estimated to be worth R2,7bn.

    One of the unsuccessful bidders complained that Telkom failed to follow due process in awarding the tender.

    Telkom then put the process on hold while it consulted legal counsel. “The issues that were considered included the validity period of the tender and the date of the award in light thereof,” Telkom lawyers said at the time.

    The operator applied to the courts to review its decision to award the tender.

    However, Bihati argued that it had been left out of the loop and accused Telkom of stalling the process in a bid to sideline Bihati from the contract. In the middle of last year Bihati decided to take the matter to court. It wanted Telkom to abide by its commitment to begin the contract or pay it the amount it would have earned as a successful bidder.

    The five other bidders shortlisted for the contract joined Bihati’s lawsuit, with Telkom filing a counterclaim contesting the suit. The case was heard in November last year with judgment held over until this year.

    According to court papers, the winning candidates were notified by Telkom and asked if the deadline for final selection could be extended. However, as a partially government-owned company, if Telkom does not select winning bidders by deadlines it sets in its tenders it has to reissue them.

    Telkom’s argument against Bihati’s claim was that the validity period of the tender had expired before it awarded the tender.

    Bihati argued the process was valid and that it should be compensated for the time and money it lost preparing to carry out the contract, which it says was in the final phases of negotiation before Telkom halted the process.

    In his lengthy ruling, high court judge Brian Southwood says Telkom was in breach of tender protocol and should have canned the tender and started the process again from scratch.

    However, Southwood says Telkom’s last-minute decision to halt the tender process is the reason it has managed to dodge the R1,7bn claim from Bihati.

    Southwood says the law dictates that because Telkom’s tender process was flawed, the group must set aside the original awarding of the tender.

    He says Bihati did not manage to prove the case that the drawn-out tender process financially prejudiced it and so he dismissed the company’s case. Bihati, and co-applicant in the case, Merid Trading, are to pay Telkom’s costs in the matter.

    Bihati marketing executive Malikhanye Mabane says the company is meeting with Telkom this week and could not comment until those discussions were concluded.  — Candice Jones, TechCentral

    • Subscribe to our free daily newsletter
    • Follow us on Twitter or on Facebook
    Bihati Solutions Merid Trading Telkom
    Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn WhatsApp Telegram Email
    Previous ArticlePadayachie’s Telkom test
    Next Article Inside Kenya’s brutal mobile price war

    Related Posts

    Floods blamed as gov’t falls behind in set-top box roll-out

    24 June 2022

    Vumacam announces big Jo’burg expansion drive

    24 June 2022

    Eskom crisis spirals: stage-4 power cuts this weekend

    24 June 2022
    Add A Comment

    Comments are closed.

    Promoted

    Watch | Telviva One: adapting to the requirements of business

    24 June 2022

    Huawei P50 now available for pre-order in South Africa

    23 June 2022

    Calabrio paves way for SA’s cloud contact centre WFO journey alongside AWS

    23 June 2022
    Opinion

    Has South Africa’s advertising industry lost its way?

    21 June 2022

    Rob Lith: What Icasa’s spectrum auction means for SA companies

    13 June 2022

    A proposed solution to crypto’s stablecoin problem

    19 May 2022

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the best South African technology news and analysis delivered to your e-mail inbox every morning.

    © 2009 - 2022 NewsCentral Media

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.