Close Menu
TechCentralTechCentral

    Subscribe to the newsletter

    Get the best South African technology news and analysis delivered to your e-mail inbox every morning.

    Facebook X (Twitter) YouTube LinkedIn
    WhatsApp Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn YouTube
    TechCentralTechCentral
    • News

      Blue Label Telecoms to change its name as restructuring gathers pace

      11 July 2025

      Get your ID delivered like pizza – home affairs’ latest digital shake-up

      11 July 2025

      EFF vows to stop Starlink from launching in South Africa

      11 July 2025

      Apple plans product blitz to reignite growth

      11 July 2025

      Nissan doubles down on South Africa despite plant uncertainty

      11 July 2025
    • World

      Grok 4 arrives with bold claims and fresh controversy

      10 July 2025

      Bitcoin pushes higher into record territory

      10 July 2025

      Cupertino vs Brussels: Apple challenges Big Tech crackdown

      7 July 2025

      Grammarly acquires e-mail start-up Superhuman

      1 July 2025

      Apple considers ditching its own AI in Siri overhaul

      1 July 2025
    • In-depth

      Siemens is battling Big Tech for AI supremacy in factories

      24 June 2025

      The algorithm will sing now: why musicians should be worried about AI

      20 June 2025

      Meta bets $72-billion on AI – and investors love it

      17 June 2025

      MultiChoice may unbundle SuperSport from DStv

      12 June 2025

      Grok promised bias-free chat. Then came the edits

      2 June 2025
    • TCS

      TCS+ | MVNX on the opportunities in South Africa’s booming MVNO market

      11 July 2025

      TCS | Connecting Saffas – Renier Lombard on The Lekker Network

      7 July 2025

      TechCentral Nexus S0E4: Takealot’s big Post Office jobs plan

      4 July 2025

      TCS | Tech, townships and tenacity: Spar’s plan to win with Spar2U

      3 July 2025

      TCS+ | First Distribution on the latest and greatest cloud technologies

      27 June 2025
    • Opinion

      In defence of equity alternatives for BEE

      30 June 2025

      E-commerce in ICT distribution: enabler or disruptor?

      30 June 2025

      South Africa pioneered drone laws a decade ago – now it must catch up

      17 June 2025

      AI and the future of ICT distribution

      16 June 2025

      Singapore soared – why can’t we? Lessons South Africa refuses to learn

      13 June 2025
    • Company Hubs
      • Africa Data Centres
      • AfriGIS
      • Altron Digital Business
      • Altron Document Solutions
      • Altron Group
      • Arctic Wolf
      • AvertITD
      • Braintree
      • CallMiner
      • CambriLearn
      • CYBER1 Solutions
      • Digicloud Africa
      • Digimune
      • Domains.co.za
      • ESET
      • Euphoria Telecom
      • Incredible Business
      • iONLINE
      • Iris Network Systems
      • LSD Open
      • NEC XON
      • Network Platforms
      • Next DLP
      • Ovations
      • Paracon
      • Paratus
      • Q-KON
      • SevenC
      • SkyWire
      • Solid8 Technologies
      • Telit Cinterion
      • Tenable
      • Vertiv
      • Videri Digital
      • Wipro
      • Workday
    • Sections
      • AI and machine learning
      • Banking
      • Broadcasting and Media
      • Cloud services
      • Contact centres and CX
      • Cryptocurrencies
      • Education and skills
      • Electronics and hardware
      • Energy and sustainability
      • Enterprise software
      • Fintech
      • Information security
      • Internet and connectivity
      • Internet of Things
      • Investment
      • IT services
      • Lifestyle
      • Motoring
      • Public sector
      • Retail and e-commerce
      • Science
      • SMEs and start-ups
      • Social media
      • Talent and leadership
      • Telecoms
    • Events
    • Advertise
    TechCentralTechCentral
    Home » News » Telkom slapped with R449m fine

    Telkom slapped with R449m fine

    By Editor7 August 2012
    Twitter LinkedIn Facebook WhatsApp Email Telegram Copy Link
    News Alerts
    WhatsApp

    The Competition Tribunal has fined Telkom R449m for abusing its dominance in the telecommunications industry over a five-year period between 1999 and 2004.

    “The tribunal concluded that Telkom leveraged its upstream monopoly in the facilities market to advantage its own subsidiary in the competitive value-added network service (Vans) market,” the regulatory body says in a statement. “Telkom’s conduct caused harm to both competitors and consumers alike and impeded competition and innovation in the dynamic Vans market.”

    Half of the penalty is to be paid within six months of the tribunal’s decision while the balance is payable within 12 months thereafter. However, Telkom has the right to appeal against the decision.

    Telkom’s share price was trading down by nearly 4% before the decision was handed down, but the counter subsequently leapt higher, trading up by nearly 1% shortly after 10am.

    The Competition Commission referred the matter to the tribunal on 24 February 2004 after it had received a complaint from the SA Vans Association and 20 other Internet service providers. Telkom challenged this referral on various fronts, including on jurisdictional grounds, in the high court. After five years of litigation the supreme court of appeal, in November 2009, rejected the jurisdictional point and referred the matter back to the tribunal for a hearing.

    The tribunal concluded that the commission did not present sufficient evidence to prove excessive pricing or price discrimination as contemplated in the Competition Act.

    In calculating the penalty, the Tribunal drew on penalty guidelines set by the competition appeal court in an earlier case involving Southern Pipeline Contractors. In terms of the Competition Act, administrative penalties are paid into the national revenue fund.

    More from the tribunal’s statement follows:

    In its complaint referral, the commission alleged that Telkom refused to supply essential access facilities to Vans providers, induced their customers not to deal with them, charged their customers excessive prices for access services and discriminated in favour of its own customers by giving them a discount on distance related charges which it did not advance to customers of the independent Vans providers.

    Through this conduct, the commission alleged, Telkom sought to expand its exclusivity to services over which, in law, it did not enjoy a monopoly. Moreover, through the use of these contractual terms, Telkom sought to bypass the regulator, which was entrusted with enforcement of the Telecommunications Act, in order to obtain for itself the additional protection of private law remedies.

    Telkom did not deny that it acted as alleged by the commission but argued that it was justified in doing so because, by providing certain value added services, the Vans providers were engaged in illegal conduct. Telkom alleged that the Vans operators had adopted a business model that effectively trespassed on Telkom’s exclusivity rights as set out in the Telecommunications Act and in its licence. During the hearing Telkom conceded that its illegality defence would fail if the tribunal were to find that Telkom’s interpretation of the regulatory framework – that is the extent of the services over which it had a legal monopoly – was incorrect. Telkom also conceded that the facilities bought by Vans from Telkom amounted to “essential facilities” as contemplated in the Competition Act.

    The tribunal found that Telkom had indeed refused to supply essential facilities to independent Vans providers and induced their customers not to deal with them, conduct which resulted in a substantial lessening of competition in the Vans market. The tribunal stated that instead of competing on the merits, Telkom had devised a strategy claiming that the independent Vans were conducting business illegally. Through this strategy, which involved the freezing of its competitors’ networks, Telkom impeded the growth of its competitors and retarded innovation in the market place. A case in point was Omnilink’s customer, the Nedbank Group, which experienced huge inconvenience as a result of the freeze and bandwidth constraints Omnilink faced from Telkom.

    On the extent of the services over which Telkom had a legal monopoly, the tribunal concluded that this issue had been decided against Telkom by both Satra and Icasa and had never been overturned on the merits. Moreover, evidence showed that Telkom’s own regulatory department held the view that Telkom’s interpretation of the law was challengeable.

    Furthermore, Telkom had chosen to respond to the claimed illegal conduct of the Vans providers in a selective and inconsistent way. While Telkom bullied its downstream competitors into line, it exploited, to its advantage, the very alleged grey area in the regulatory framework by integrating voice and data and bypassing the regulator’s requirement of separate accounting for PSTS and Vans services, the tribunal stated in its judgment. Accordingly the Tribunal found no merit in Telkom’s illegality defence.



    Competition Commission competition tribunal Telkom
    Subscribe to TechCentral Subscribe to TechCentral
    Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn WhatsApp Telegram Email Copy Link
    Previous ArticleD-day for Telkom in competition case
    Next Article ‘Bully’ Telkom must cough up

    Related Posts

    Vodacom, Maziv deal now looks likely after CompCom U-turn

    8 July 2025

    Vodacom’s influence on Maziv too strong to ignore: tribunal

    27 June 2025

    Finally! Tribunal unpacks why it blocked Vodacom’s Vumatel deal

    24 June 2025
    Company News

    $125-trillion traded: Binance redefines global finance in just eight years

    11 July 2025

    NEC XON welcomes HPE acquisition of Juniper Networks

    11 July 2025

    LTE Cat 1 vs Cat 1 bis – what’s the difference?

    11 July 2025
    Opinion

    In defence of equity alternatives for BEE

    30 June 2025

    E-commerce in ICT distribution: enabler or disruptor?

    30 June 2025

    South Africa pioneered drone laws a decade ago – now it must catch up

    17 June 2025

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the best South African technology news and analysis delivered to your e-mail inbox every morning.

    © 2009 - 2025 NewsCentral Media

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.