TechCentralTechCentral
    Facebook Twitter YouTube LinkedIn
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn YouTube
    TechCentralTechCentral
    NEWSLETTER
    • News

      Rogue database felled Capitec in its worst-ever IT outage

      7 August 2022

      Presidency trumpets ICT, electricity reforms

      7 August 2022

      Load shedding suspended as generation picture improves

      7 August 2022

      South Africa’s power plan is meaningless without protecting the infrastructure

      7 August 2022

      Solidarity, MTN in war of words over restructuring

      5 August 2022
    • World

      Musk challenges Twitter CEO to a public debate

      7 August 2022

      Amazon splashes $1.7-billion on Roomba maker iRobot

      5 August 2022

      Nigeria asks Google to block banned groups from YouTube

      5 August 2022

      Twitter rejects Musk’s claims that he was hoodwinked

      5 August 2022

      MultiChoice fined R200 000 by Nigerian regulator

      4 August 2022
    • In-depth

      The length of Earth’s days has been increasing – and no one knows why

      7 August 2022

      As Facebook fades, the Mad Men of advertising stage a comeback

      2 August 2022

      Crypto breaks the rules. That’s the point

      27 July 2022

      E-mail scams are getting chillingly personal

      17 July 2022

      Webb telescope’s stunning images of the cosmos

      12 July 2022
    • Podcasts

      How South Africa can woo more women into tech

      4 August 2022

      Book and check-in via WhatsApp? FlySafair is on it

      28 July 2022

      Interview: Why Dell’s next-gen PowerEdge servers change the game

      28 July 2022

      Demystifying the complexity of AI – fact vs fiction

      6 July 2022

      How your organisation can triage its information security risk

      22 June 2022
    • Opinion

      SIU seeks to set aside R215-million IT tender

      19 July 2022

      No reason South Africa should have a shortage of electricity: Ramaphosa

      11 July 2022

      Ntshavheni’s bias against the private sector

      8 July 2022

      South Africa can no longer rely on Eskom alone

      4 July 2022

      Has South Africa’s advertising industry lost its way?

      21 June 2022
    • Company Hubs
      • 1-grid
      • Altron Document Solutions
      • Amplitude
      • Atvance Intellect
      • Axiz
      • BOATech
      • CallMiner
      • Digital Generation
      • E4
      • ESET
      • Euphoria Telecom
      • IBM
      • Kyocera Document Solutions
      • Microsoft
      • Nutanix
      • One Trust
      • Pinnacle
      • Skybox Security
      • SkyWire
      • Tarsus on Demand
      • Videri Digital
      • Zendesk
    • Sections
      • Banking
      • Broadcasting and Media
      • Cloud computing
      • Consumer electronics
      • Cryptocurrencies
      • Education and skills
      • Energy
      • Fintech
      • Information security
      • Internet and connectivity
      • Internet of Things
      • Investment
      • IT services
      • Motoring and transport
      • Public sector
      • Science
      • Social media
      • Talent and leadership
      • Telecoms
    • Advertise
    TechCentralTechCentral
    Home»Sections»Cryptocurrencies»The lights are going out for crypto’s laser-eyed grifters

    The lights are going out for crypto’s laser-eyed grifters

    Cryptocurrencies By Lionel Laurent28 June 2022
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn WhatsApp Telegram Email

    There aren’t many silver linings to be found in the cryptocurrency crash. People have lost money, often those who could least afford it. But one welcome casualty is the army of laser-eyed social media “influencers”, toxic promoters in what must surely rank as the one of the most egregious product-placement manias in financial history. What comes next should be a healthier focus on consumer protection in an age of digital investing.

    The simple identifier of a pair of laser eyes — a badge of optimism that bitcoin was headed for US$100 000 and beyond — at its peak adorned the avatars of congresswomen, billionaires, sports stars and, of course, hordes of rank-and-file crypto enthusiasts.

    The lasers aren’t shining so brightly after the latest rout in cryptoland, with some going completely dark, presumably in an effort at reputational damage control. The Winklevoss twins are now busy promoting their next act as musicians in a covers band called Mars Junction; Elon Musk is insisting he never told anyone to buy; and celebrities who once flaunted their non-fungible tokens have now taken them down.

    People with laser eyes on their profile photos have unwittingly slapped an obvious health warning on their content

    The real changes will come lower down the speculative food chain, as the fuel runs out for viral economic narratives promoting crypto trading among young and impressionable consumers eager to get rich quicker than the rest of society.

    The business model of influencers is to take real dollars in exchange for promoting virtual cash. At one point, YouTubers were being offered $30 000 to promote crypto-linked investments. But those dollars are drying up as trading on exchanges diminishes and start-up funding disappears. Even Coinbase Global, with a market capitalisation of more than $12-billion, has slashed affiliate marketing fees, according to Business Insider. Influencers who just months ago were making $40 for each new sign-up to the platform are now being offered $2 to $3.

    Celebrities such as Matt Damon and Larry David deserve the mudslinging for promoting ads, but at least their affiliations were clear. Not all social media personalities are scammers. But those with less transparent ties to the products they were promoting — such as YouTuber Logan Paul, a cheerleader to his 23 million followers for collapsed token Dink Doink, a project that he told the New York Times in May went “absurdly wrong” — are clearly eroding the trust of followers in general.

    Transparency

    And as the obvious ignorance of some crypto shills filters through to their fans — who will surely tire of the constant claims that crypto is an “inflation hedge” when it’s anything but — more regulatory intervention as well as voluntary crackdowns by TikTok and other social media platforms are likely not far behind. Some reality TV stars’ accounts have been shut down, with Snapchat suspending Jazz and Laurent Correia last year.

    This isn’t about censorship, but transparency. Jackson Palmer, Dogecoin’s co-creator, has an umbrella term to describe our world: Griftonomics. Applying it to crypto, he says, reveals a network of “bought influencers”. One study by the Dutch financial markets regulator of 150 influencers covering more than a million followers found that only a tiny fraction — around 1% — weren’t making money from affiliated projects. many of which weren’t disclosed.

    The authorities obviously have a role to play in cleaning up the worst excesses. Advertising overseers in the UK and France have done a decent job in halting misleading ad campaigns. Kim Kardashian and Floyd Mayweather were both sued in January, accused of hyping a digital currency called EthereumMax to investors. Mayweather had already been fined by the US Securities and Exchange Commission in 2018 for touting coins without disclosing a financial interest, while last year Kardashian was admonished by the UK Financial Conduct Authority for using her fanbase to promote “a speculative digital token created a month before by unknown developers”.

    Misleading economic narratives about inflation hedges could be countered by qualified influencers, as with other forms of misinformation

    But there’s an urgent need for more financial and digital literacy, too. Young people are saddled with debts at an increasingly early age and feel the pressure acutely. There’s also a feeling that wealth is accumulated through being lucky — born in the right generation or to the right family, or by backing the right token — rather than due to merit. That helps explain why “buy now, pay later” loans have flourished among those who struggle to repay them, and why a high percentage of people follow and listen to influencers.

    There’s a role here for parents and educators, and maybe even specific apps with guardrails to allow for experimental spending with small amounts of cash. And it should also be possible for regulators to fight fire with fire: misleading economic narratives about inflation hedges could be countered by qualified influencers, as with other forms of misinformation.

    But for now, people with laser eyes on their profile photos have unwittingly slapped an obvious health warning on their content. If you see those two red dots, steer clear.  — (c) 2022 Bloomberg LP

    Lionel Laurent
    Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn WhatsApp Telegram Email
    Previous ArticleProsus sale plan sends Chinese tech stocks tumbling
    Next Article Google Cloud customers will learn their Gmail carbon footprint

    Related Posts

    Rogue database felled Capitec in its worst-ever IT outage

    7 August 2022

    Presidency trumpets ICT, electricity reforms

    7 August 2022

    Load shedding suspended as generation picture improves

    7 August 2022
    Add A Comment

    Comments are closed.

    Promoted

    You don’t need a call centre to take advantage of call centre technology

    5 August 2022

    Black man, you are still on your own

    5 August 2022

    UC&C interoperability offers businesses operational cost relief in tough times

    4 August 2022
    Opinion

    SIU seeks to set aside R215-million IT tender

    19 July 2022

    No reason South Africa should have a shortage of electricity: Ramaphosa

    11 July 2022

    Ntshavheni’s bias against the private sector

    8 July 2022

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the best South African technology news and analysis delivered to your e-mail inbox every morning.

    © 2009 - 2022 NewsCentral Media

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.