TechCentralTechCentral
    Facebook Twitter YouTube LinkedIn
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn YouTube
    TechCentral TechCentral
    NEWSLETTER
    • News

      300% growth for Pick n Pay asap!

      17 May 2022

      Stablecoins wend wobbly way into the unknown

      17 May 2022

      Vodacom goes big on capex

      16 May 2022

      Load shedding escalated to stage 4

      16 May 2022

      Mteto Nyati bows out of Altron on a strong note

      16 May 2022
    • World

      Intel shareholders reject pay packages for top executives

      17 May 2022

      Musk hints at reduced offer price for Twitter

      17 May 2022

      SpaceX gets $125-billion valuation in private placement

      17 May 2022

      Crypto’s wild week offers a much-needed warning

      16 May 2022

      Terra’s $45-billion face plant creates a crowd of crypto losers

      16 May 2022
    • In-depth

      The standard model of particle physics may be broken

      11 May 2022

      Meet Jared Birchall, Elon Musk’s personal ‘fixer’

      6 May 2022

      Twitter takeover was brash and fast, with Musk calling the shots

      26 April 2022

      Musk wants free speech on Twitter but spent years silencing critics

      21 April 2022

      Musk’s board-seat tweet needed an edit button

      11 April 2022
    • Podcasts

      Everything PC S01E01 – ‘AMD: Ryzen from the dead – part 1’

      10 May 2022

      Llew Claasen on how exchange controls are harming SA tech start-ups

      2 May 2022

      The inside scoop on OVEX’s big expansion plans

      20 April 2022

      Decentralised finance, the ‘end of banks’ – and what comes next

      25 March 2022

      Maxtec and BigFix: helping stop cyberattackers in their tracks

      18 March 2022
    • Opinion

      From spectrum to roads, why fixing SA’s problems is an uphill battle

      19 April 2022

      How AI is being deployed in the fight against cybercriminals

      8 April 2022

      Cash is still king … but not for much longer

      31 March 2022

      Icasa on the role of TV white spaces and dynamic spectrum access

      31 March 2022

      Minister Ntshavheni is at risk of tripping up

      24 March 2022
    • Company Hubs
      • 1-grid
      • Altron Document Solutions
      • Amplitude
      • Atvance Intellect
      • Axiz
      • BOATech
      • CallMiner
      • Digital Generation
      • E4
      • ESET
      • Euphoria Telecom
      • IBM
      • Kyocera Document Solutions
      • Microsoft
      • Nutanix
      • One Trust
      • Pinnacle
      • Skybox Security
      • SkyWire
      • Videri Digital
      • Zendesk
    • Sections
      • Banking
      • Broadcasting and Media
      • Cloud computing
      • Consumer electronics
      • Cryptocurrencies
      • Education and skills
      • Energy
      • Fintech
      • Information security
      • Internet and connectivity
      • Internet of Things
      • Investment
      • IT services
      • Motoring and transport
      • Public sector
      • Science
      • Social media
      • Talent and leadership
      • Telecoms
    • Advertise
    TechCentralTechCentral
    Home»News»Vodacom, MTN ‘should have disclosed costs’

    Vodacom, MTN ‘should have disclosed costs’

    News By Sapa Reporter26 March 2014
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn WhatsApp Telegram Email

    Icasa signage alt 640

    MTN and Vodacom should have disclosed their costs for calls to other networks, the high court in Johannesburg heard on Wednesday.

    David Unterhalter SC, for communications regulator Icasa, argued that the companies would not reveal these costs to Icasa when it was formulating regulations for 2014.

    “It has remained a dark secret as to what their costs of termination are.”

    Cellphone network operators MTN and Vodacom are challenging the introduction of new asymmetrical call termination rates.

    These are the rates operators have to pay one another for calls to other networks.

    Icasa wants to implement a set of regulations that will see these rates drop to 20c/minute on 1 April. MTN and Vodacom will have to pay 44c/minute to smaller operators, while the smaller companies will have to pay only 20c, in an asymmetrical structure.

    MTN and Vodacom want the 2014 regulations scrapped. Alternatively, they want interim relief to prevent the introduction of the new rates until they have been reviewed.

    Regarding the costs of call termination, Unterhalter said MTN and Vodacom would not disclose these to Icasa, despite the fact that they were at liberty to do so as there were no regulations necessary for this.

    “They could have, they should have, and they didn’t.”

    On Tuesday, Alfred Cocknell SC, for MTN, argued that there were issues of procedural fairness in Icasa’s dealing with the regulations and that it was Icasa that had withheld information.

    He said MTN had sought to make submissions on the draft regulations, but was not given the relevant information to make meaningful submissions.

    MTN asked for the costing study and regional or global benchmarking studies that informed the regulations, but Icasa refused.

    Icasa also refused to reveal the method it used to arrive at the new rates, he said.

    On Wednesday morning, Gilbert Marcus, SC also for Icasa, argued that the 2014 regulations should go ahead, despite the concession that the second, 15c, and third year, 10c, of the three-year plan needed to be amended.

    Icasa made no concession for the first year of the plan.

    “There is no necessary or inevitable link between year one, and years two and three,” Marcus said.

    Icasa has indicated that it would take about six months to amend the regulations relating to 2015 and 2016.

    “Icasa has no concerns about year one and has statutory power to … have a fresh look at years two and three,” Marcus argued.

    Unterhalter said that before the market was regulated, MTN and Vodacom substantially increased their call termination rates and “profited handsomely over many years”.

    There was concern that if the 2014 regulations were not implemented on Tuesday as planned, the regulatory “vacuum” could leave the field open to similar practices.

    The decision to grant lower termination rates to smaller players in the mobile market than to MTN and Vodacom was motivated by a desire to promote competition in the retail market.

    Through the asymmetrical rates, the smaller players would have an opportunity to build their infrastructure and attract more customers.  — Sapa

    Icasa MTN Vodacom
    Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn WhatsApp Telegram Email
    Previous ArticleInvestors dump Pinnacle for second day
    Next Article Green light for .africa domain

    Related Posts

    300% growth for Pick n Pay asap!

    17 May 2022

    Stablecoins wend wobbly way into the unknown

    17 May 2022

    Vodacom goes big on capex

    16 May 2022
    Add A Comment

    Comments are closed.

    Promoted

    Accelerating test automation

    16 May 2022

    Maxtec provides partners with a seamless credit solution

    13 May 2022

    Skybox research reveals a perilous threat landscape

    12 May 2022
    Opinion

    From spectrum to roads, why fixing SA’s problems is an uphill battle

    19 April 2022

    How AI is being deployed in the fight against cybercriminals

    8 April 2022

    Cash is still king … but not for much longer

    31 March 2022

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the best South African technology news and analysis delivered to your e-mail inbox every morning.

    © 2009 - 2022 NewsCentral Media

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.