Close Menu
TechCentralTechCentral

    Subscribe to the newsletter

    Get the best South African technology news and analysis delivered to your e-mail inbox every morning.

    Facebook X (Twitter) YouTube LinkedIn
    WhatsApp Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn YouTube
    TechCentralTechCentral
    • News

      Britehouse breaks free from NTT Data

      10 July 2025

      Samsung’s bet on folding phones faces major test

      10 July 2025

      OpenAI to launch web browser in direct challenge to Google Chrome

      10 July 2025

      The satellite broadband operators taking on Starlink

      9 July 2025

      Yaccarino out: Musk’s handpicked CEO quits X suddenly

      9 July 2025
    • World

      Grok 4 arrives with bold claims and fresh controversy

      10 July 2025

      Cupertino vs Brussels: Apple challenges Big Tech crackdown

      7 July 2025

      Grammarly acquires e-mail start-up Superhuman

      1 July 2025

      Apple considers ditching its own AI in Siri overhaul

      1 July 2025

      Jony Ive’s first AI gadget could be … a pen

      30 June 2025
    • In-depth

      Siemens is battling Big Tech for AI supremacy in factories

      24 June 2025

      The algorithm will sing now: why musicians should be worried about AI

      20 June 2025

      Meta bets $72-billion on AI – and investors love it

      17 June 2025

      MultiChoice may unbundle SuperSport from DStv

      12 June 2025

      Grok promised bias-free chat. Then came the edits

      2 June 2025
    • TCS

      TCS | Connecting Saffas – Renier Lombard on The Lekker Network

      7 July 2025

      TechCentral Nexus S0E4: Takealot’s big Post Office jobs plan

      4 July 2025

      TCS | Tech, townships and tenacity: Spar’s plan to win with Spar2U

      3 July 2025

      TCS+ | First Distribution on the latest and greatest cloud technologies

      27 June 2025

      TCS+ | First Distribution on data governance in hybrid cloud environments

      27 June 2025
    • Opinion

      In defence of equity alternatives for BEE

      30 June 2025

      E-commerce in ICT distribution: enabler or disruptor?

      30 June 2025

      South Africa pioneered drone laws a decade ago – now it must catch up

      17 June 2025

      AI and the future of ICT distribution

      16 June 2025

      Singapore soared – why can’t we? Lessons South Africa refuses to learn

      13 June 2025
    • Company Hubs
      • Africa Data Centres
      • AfriGIS
      • Altron Digital Business
      • Altron Document Solutions
      • Altron Group
      • Arctic Wolf
      • AvertITD
      • Braintree
      • CallMiner
      • CambriLearn
      • CYBER1 Solutions
      • Digicloud Africa
      • Digimune
      • Domains.co.za
      • ESET
      • Euphoria Telecom
      • Incredible Business
      • iONLINE
      • Iris Network Systems
      • LSD Open
      • NEC XON
      • Network Platforms
      • Next DLP
      • Ovations
      • Paracon
      • Paratus
      • Q-KON
      • SevenC
      • SkyWire
      • Solid8 Technologies
      • Telit Cinterion
      • Tenable
      • Vertiv
      • Videri Digital
      • Wipro
      • Workday
    • Sections
      • AI and machine learning
      • Banking
      • Broadcasting and Media
      • Cloud services
      • Contact centres and CX
      • Cryptocurrencies
      • Education and skills
      • Electronics and hardware
      • Energy and sustainability
      • Enterprise software
      • Fintech
      • Information security
      • Internet and connectivity
      • Internet of Things
      • Investment
      • IT services
      • Lifestyle
      • Motoring
      • Public sector
      • Retail and e-commerce
      • Science
      • SMEs and start-ups
      • Social media
      • Talent and leadership
      • Telecoms
    • Events
    • Advertise
    TechCentralTechCentral
    Home » News » Vodacom, Telkom square off over voice quality

    Vodacom, Telkom square off over voice quality

    By Duncan McLeod24 July 2013
    Twitter LinkedIn Facebook WhatsApp Email Telegram Copy Link
    News Alerts
    WhatsApp

    cell-user-640

    Vodacom has given its rival Telkom Mobile a bloody nose at the Advertising Standards Authority over a tussle over which operator offers better voice quality, with the authority ordering that Telkom must stop flighting a television advertisement in which it makes claims the authority says haven’t been substantiated.

    The ad in question pokes fun at an unnamed rival network, with suggestions in the ad that consumers are with the “wrong network” when they are unable to have a clear conversation.

    “All I know is that she’s clearly not with Telkom Mobile. I mean, Telkom Mobile has an incredible network, built to carry better voice quality so you can actually hear the full message,” a voice says in the ad. The ad also claims that Telkom Mobile provides “unlimited network coverage”.

    Vodacom said that the claim of “better voice quality” was clearly in relation to other mobile networks in South Africa. “Because the commercial does not identify a single network as the comparator, the ‘better voice quality’ claim has to be true in relation to each of the individual competing networks,” it argued.

    In addition, it said Telkom Mobile did not offer better voice quality. It based this on its own research performed by a “professional, external company” which has performed more than 80 000 tests per network around the country so far this year.

    “It is evident from these tests that Telkom Mobile is not the best voice network in South Africa,” the operator said in its complaint. It said, too, that not a single network in South Africa offers “unlimited network coverage”, including Vodacom. “No network covers 100% of South Africa.”

    In response, Telkom Mobile argued that it was not claiming to have the best voice quality but rather that it offered better voice quality than other networks. “No claim is made that it is better than any specific service provider. Furthermore, no reference is made to mobile networks in particular. ‘Network’ means any network [and] … there is therefore no basis for [Vodacom] to assume that the claim regarding ‘better voice quality’ specifically relates to the other mobile networks in South Africa only.”

    It said, too, that as the fourth entrant in the mobile market, it was “making use of the latest technology, equipment and architecture”, while its rivals were “possibly still making use of their older legacy networks”.

    “By using the latest technology, equipment and architecture, Telkom Mobile is able to provide mobile voice services which have a better voice quality,” it said. In support of this argument, it submitted a confidential report from Atio Corp. According to the Advertising Standards Authority, the report contained the results of several tests carried out on Telkom Mobile’s network and the networks of two other mobile operators.

    In addition, Telkom Mobile argued that its “unlimited network coverage” claim did not refer to 100% coverage as interpreted by Vodacom. “Instead, the term refers to the fact that a subscriber’s access to services is not limited to the coverage area of Telkom Mobile’s network. This subscriber may also roam on another large mobile operator’s network in areas where Telkom Mobile does not have coverage… As a result, the term ‘unlimited coverage’ should be interpreted as coverage not limited to the footprint of a single network provider. Also, due to the fact that Telkom Mobile uses the latest technology, equipment and architecture available in the mobile market, it is not limited to using specific technology to provide coverage to its subscribers.”

    In its ruling, the authority said Telkom’s claim to have “unlimited network coverage” suggested it covered 100% of South Africa, which was not true. However, it was “not convinced” that consumers would interpret the claim to mean Telkom Mobile covered 100% of South Africa and dismissed this aspect of Vodacom’s complaint.

    On the claims about voice quality, the authority found in favour of Vodacom, saying Telkom Mobile failed to provide adequate substantiation. It noted from the Atio report that tests compared only the Vodacom and Telkom Mobile networks, meaning the evidence supplied fell “far short of showing that Telkom Mobile carries better voice quality than all other networks”. Testing was also only carried out in Johannesburg and Durban.

    The authority ruled that Telkom Mobile must withdraw its claim with immediate effect.  — (c) 2013 NewsCentral Media



    Advertising Standards Authority ASA Atio Atio Corp Telkom Telkom Mobile Vodacom
    Subscribe to TechCentral Subscribe to TechCentral
    Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn WhatsApp Telegram Email Copy Link
    Previous ArticleSES signs 15-year OpenView HD deal
    Next Article Kagiso Media’s pay-TV plans revealed

    Related Posts

    Vodacom, Maziv deal now looks likely after CompCom U-turn

    8 July 2025

    Sasol, Vodacom team up to modernise Secunda operations

    4 July 2025

    Vodacom’s influence on Maziv too strong to ignore: tribunal

    27 June 2025
    Company News

    Samsung unfolds the future with thinnest, lightest Galaxy Z Fold yet

    9 July 2025

    Huawei supercharges South African SMEs with over 20 new eKit products

    9 July 2025

    Webtonic cracks the talent code with AWS-powered TonicHub

    9 July 2025
    Opinion

    In defence of equity alternatives for BEE

    30 June 2025

    E-commerce in ICT distribution: enabler or disruptor?

    30 June 2025

    South Africa pioneered drone laws a decade ago – now it must catch up

    17 June 2025

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the best South African technology news and analysis delivered to your e-mail inbox every morning.

    © 2009 - 2025 NewsCentral Media

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.