Close Menu
TechCentralTechCentral

    Subscribe to the newsletter

    Get the best South African technology news and analysis delivered to your e-mail inbox every morning.

    Facebook X (Twitter) YouTube LinkedIn
    WhatsApp Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn YouTube
    TechCentralTechCentral
    • News

      Home affairs under fire

      24 June 2025

      Samsung to unveil new folding phones at July event

      24 June 2025

      Capital Appreciation banks on payments to offset software slump

      24 June 2025

      Crypto is becoming a ‘practical payment method’ in South Africa

      24 June 2025

      Siemens is battling Big Tech for AI supremacy in factories

      24 June 2025
    • World

      Mira Murati’s Thinking Machines hits $10-billion valuation

      24 June 2025

      Watch | Starship rocket explodes in setback to Musk’s Mars mission

      19 June 2025

      Trump Mobile dials into politics, profit and patriarchy

      17 June 2025

      Samsung plots health data hub to link users and doctors in real time

      17 June 2025

      Beijing’s chip champions blacklisted by Taiwan

      16 June 2025
    • In-depth

      Meta bets $72-billion on AI – and investors love it

      17 June 2025

      MultiChoice may unbundle SuperSport from DStv

      12 June 2025

      Grok promised bias-free chat. Then came the edits

      2 June 2025

      Digital fortress: We go inside JB5, Teraco’s giant new AI-ready data centre

      30 May 2025

      Sam Altman and Jony Ive’s big bet to out-Apple Apple

      22 May 2025
    • TCS

      TechCentral Nexus S0E3: Behind Takealot’s revenue surge

      23 June 2025

      TCS | South Africa’s Sociable wants to make social media social again

      23 June 2025

      TCS+ | AfriGIS’s Helen Hulett on how tech can help resolve South Africa’s water crisis

      18 June 2025

      TechCentral Nexus S0E2: South Africa’s digital battlefield

      16 June 2025

      TechCentral Nexus S0E1: Starlink, BEE and a new leader at Vodacom

      8 June 2025
    • Opinion

      South Africa pioneered drone laws a decade ago – now it must catch up

      17 June 2025

      AI and the future of ICT distribution

      16 June 2025

      Singapore soared – why can’t we? Lessons South Africa refuses to learn

      13 June 2025

      South Africa risks being left behind as stablecoins reshape global finance

      6 June 2025

      Beyond the box: why IT distribution depends on real partnerships

      2 June 2025
    • Company Hubs
      • Africa Data Centres
      • AfriGIS
      • Altron Digital Business
      • Altron Document Solutions
      • Altron Group
      • Arctic Wolf
      • AvertITD
      • Braintree
      • CallMiner
      • CambriLearn
      • CYBER1 Solutions
      • Digicloud Africa
      • Digimune
      • Domains.co.za
      • ESET
      • Euphoria Telecom
      • Incredible Business
      • iONLINE
      • Iris Network Systems
      • LSD Open
      • NEC XON
      • Network Platforms
      • Next DLP
      • Ovations
      • Paracon
      • Paratus
      • Q-KON
      • SevenC
      • SkyWire
      • Solid8 Technologies
      • Telit Cinterion
      • Tenable
      • Vertiv
      • Videri Digital
      • Wipro
      • Workday
    • Sections
      • AI and machine learning
      • Banking
      • Broadcasting and Media
      • Cloud services
      • Contact centres and CX
      • Cryptocurrencies
      • Education and skills
      • Electronics and hardware
      • Energy and sustainability
      • Enterprise software
      • Fintech
      • Information security
      • Internet and connectivity
      • Internet of Things
      • Investment
      • IT services
      • Lifestyle
      • Motoring
      • Public sector
      • Retail and e-commerce
      • Science
      • SMEs and start-ups
      • Social media
      • Talent and leadership
      • Telecoms
    • Events
    • Advertise
    TechCentralTechCentral
    Home » Top » Apple, Samsung to square off in court

    Apple, Samsung to square off in court

    By Agency Staff10 October 2016
    Twitter LinkedIn Facebook WhatsApp Email Telegram Copy Link
    News Alerts
    WhatsApp

    apple-vs-samsung-640

    The end of the smartphone wars is almost here.

    Six years after Apple filed its first lawsuit alleging unauthorised copying of the iPhone, the company will square off at the US supreme court on Tuesday against rival Samsung Electronics. They will argue over how much of a US$399m patent infringement award Samsung must pay.

    The fight will be one of the last showdowns between two antagonists that have filed four dozen lawsuits against each other and spent hundreds of millions of dollars on legal fees.

    Samsung says the award, which represents its entire profit from 11 disputed phones, is a “disproportionate” sum for infringement of Apple’s patented design features. Apple says the full award is warranted given Samsung’s “blatant copying” of the iPhone’s iconic look.

    The case comes as both companies grapple with more pressing legal concerns — Apple’s $15bn European tax fight and Samsung’s exploding battery crisis.

    It will be the supreme court’s first examination in 120 years of design patents, which cover the ornamental look of an object rather than any functional aspect. The court last looked at design patents in disputes involving spoon handles in the 1870s and carpets in the 1890s.

    Apple’s design patents cover the rounded corners of its phones, the rim that surrounds the front face and the grid of icons that users view.

    A federal appeals court upheld the award, saying US patent law lets Apple recoup Samsung’s total profit from the phones, and not just the part attributable to the copied design.

    In urging the supreme court to take up the appeal, Samsung said the ruling was akin to awarding the entire profits on a car because of an infringing cup holder. Apple rejects that analogy, saying that its patented features are more like the design of the entire car.

    The case has narrowed since the high court accepted it in March. In court papers, Apple says it accepts that in some cases the patent holder can collect only the profit attributable to a particular component, and not the earnings from the entire product.

    Apple says, however, that Samsung failed to show that the patented designs applied only to part of its phones. Samsung contends that it was Apple’s burden to show that the infringement gave Samsung any increased profits.

    The case “has essentially now devolved into a dispute over what party showed what at trial and who bears the burden of proof,” said Kannon Shanmugam, a Washington lawyer who filed a brief backing Samsung on behalf of companies including Facebook and Google.

    Even so, the amount of money at issue, as well as the PR impact, means the stakes are still high for Apple and Samsung. The supreme court could uphold the award, invalidate it entirely or order a new trial on the amount of damages. Its ruling will also affect Apple’s effort to win another $180m from Samsung for five devices that have already been found to be infringing.

    Samsung already paid Apple the $399m, plus another $150m for infringing a patent on “pinch to zoom” technology. In a separate case, a federal appeals court last week reinstated a $120m verdict against Samsung in a suit involving Apple’s slide-to-unlock feature.

    Hard to settle

    Apple filed its first smartphone suit against HTC in 2010. It quickly developed into a global battle against every major manufacturer of phones running on Google’s Android operating system.

    In the end, Apple never succeeded in getting any disputed devices off the market because the phones evolved faster than the courts could act. HTC eventually signed an agreement not to copy the iPhone, while Motorola Mobility, then owned by Google, simply declared a ceasefire. Apple and Samsung opted in 2014 to drop all but two of the cases.

    A supreme court decision clarifying how much Samsung should pay could be the catalyst for a final settlement, though it won’t be easy, said Paul Berghoff, a Chicago patent lawyer with McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff who has been watching the case but isn’t involved in it.

    “Sometimes once litigants have been battling for so long, what happens is they develop levels of enmity and distrust on both sides that make it very difficult to settle the cases,” he said. “Face-saving is a very real issue for all companies. It’s hard to get out of it once you’re in it.”  — (c) 2016 Bloomberg LP



    Apple Google HTC Motorola Samsung
    Subscribe to TechCentral Subscribe to TechCentral
    Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn WhatsApp Telegram Email Copy Link
    Previous ArticlePolicy makers must learn from past mistakes
    Next Article Zuma wants witness list in Gupta probe

    Related Posts

    Samsung to unveil new folding phones at July event

    24 June 2025

    Siemens is battling Big Tech for AI supremacy in factories

    24 June 2025

    Apple shifts its AI strategy

    23 June 2025
    Company News

    TechCentral: South Africa’s premier platform for ICT leaders

    24 June 2025

    Section 18A deductions and BEE points – a strategic choice for business compliance in 2025

    24 June 2025

    Huawei Watch Fit 4 Series: beauty, brains and a battery that won’t quit

    24 June 2025
    Opinion

    South Africa pioneered drone laws a decade ago – now it must catch up

    17 June 2025

    AI and the future of ICT distribution

    16 June 2025

    Singapore soared – why can’t we? Lessons South Africa refuses to learn

    13 June 2025

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the best South African technology news and analysis delivered to your e-mail inbox every morning.

    © 2009 - 2025 NewsCentral Media

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.