TechCentralTechCentral
    Facebook Twitter YouTube LinkedIn
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn YouTube
    TechCentralTechCentral
    NEWSLETTER
    • News

      Standard Bank IT spending tops R10-billion in six months

      19 August 2022

      Hungry Prosus to splurge up to R30.7-billion on iFood stake

      19 August 2022

      Koeberg unit shut down due to mechanical fault

      19 August 2022

      Blue Label expects robust full-year earnings growth

      19 August 2022

      Sarb tells banks they should work with crypto exchanges

      18 August 2022
    • World

      15 September pegged as target date for ethereum’s big ‘Merge’

      19 August 2022

      Qualcomm gets serious about servers

      19 August 2022

      China blasts US over ‘discriminatory’ Chips Act

      18 August 2022

      Tencent reports first-ever sales decline

      17 August 2022

      Chip makers are flashing a big warning for the global economy

      17 August 2022
    • In-depth

      Are you a chronic procrastinator? Read this!

      18 August 2022

      Semiconductor boom turns to bust

      16 August 2022

      African unicorn Flutterwave battles fires on multiple fronts

      11 August 2022

      The length of Earth’s days has been increasing – and no one knows why

      7 August 2022

      As Facebook fades, the Mad Men of advertising stage a comeback

      2 August 2022
    • Podcasts

      Qush on infosec: why prevention is always better than cure

      11 August 2022

      e4’s Adri Führi on encouraging more women into tech careers

      10 August 2022

      How South Africa can woo more women into tech

      4 August 2022

      Book and check-in via WhatsApp? FlySafair is on it

      28 July 2022

      Interview: Why Dell’s next-gen PowerEdge servers change the game

      28 July 2022
    • Opinion

      How AI could transform financial services in emerging markets

      19 August 2022

      No reason South Africa should have a shortage of electricity: Ramaphosa

      11 July 2022

      Ntshavheni’s bias against the private sector

      8 July 2022

      South Africa can no longer rely on Eskom alone

      4 July 2022

      Has South Africa’s advertising industry lost its way?

      21 June 2022
    • Company Hubs
      • 1-grid
      • Africa Data Centres
      • Altron Document Solutions
      • Amplitude
      • Atvance Intellect
      • Axiz
      • BOATech
      • CallMiner
      • Digital Generation
      • E4
      • ESET
      • Euphoria Telecom
      • IBM
      • Kyocera Document Solutions
      • Microsoft
      • Nutanix
      • One Trust
      • Pinnacle
      • Skybox Security
      • SkyWire
      • Tarsus on Demand
      • Videri Digital
      • Zendesk
    • Sections
      • Banking
      • Broadcasting and Media
      • Cloud computing
      • Consumer electronics
      • Cryptocurrencies
      • Education and skills
      • Energy
      • Fintech
      • Information security
      • Internet and connectivity
      • Internet of Things
      • Investment
      • IT services
      • Motoring and transport
      • Public sector
      • Science
      • Social media
      • Talent and leadership
      • Telecoms
    • Advertise
    TechCentralTechCentral
    Home»News»Caxton loses MultiChoice challenge

    Caxton loses MultiChoice challenge

    News By Agency Staff11 February 2016
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn WhatsApp Telegram Email

    gavel-640

    The Competition Tribunal found on Thursday that a 2013 deal between the SABC and MultiChoice that would give the pay-television company the right to air two of the public broadcaster’s channels, did not constitute a merger to be notified in terms of the Competition Act.

    A complaint had been brought by Caxton, Save Our SABC Coalition and Media Monitoring Africa.

    The complainants said the agreement was a merger that had not been notified. They sought an order that the SABC and MultiChoice notify the deal as a merger.

    There were two main concerns raised by Caxton regarding the agreement. Firstly, it was concerned that the agreement gave MultiChoice an exclusive license to use certain SABC content to broadcast on an entertainment channel on DStv. This channel is assembled from archive material owned by the SABC.

    Secondly, Caxton was concerned that the SABC agreed to broadcast its SABC 1, 2 and 3 channels, and any future channels, on an unencrypted basis and without any conditional access system.

    The tribunal was called upon to decide whether the agreement altered the control structure of SABC’s businesses in that it provided MultiChoice with control over SABC’s archived programmes and whether it conferred on MultiChoice control over SABC’s television broadcast strategy in respect of its stance on the digital terrestrial policy.

    The tribunal found that Caxton’s case was weakened as the case progressed. When Caxton brought the case it was based on the interpretation of the original agreement, which was leaked and entered the public domain, according to the tribunal.

    However, the agreement was amended on three subsequent occasions and this changed the ambit of the constraints and diluted certain rights that the original agreement conferred on MultiChoice.

    The tribunal further found that the entire archive was not barred from use by the SABC but merely the portion that related to the entertainment channel, and was then still subject to the minimum rebroadcasting delays. This content was furthermore selected by the SABC, subject to the veto right that MultiChoice enjoys relating to the standards of quality the channel needs to meet.

    A further effect on the market that the tribunal had to consider was whether the agreement hampers a rival (for instance TopTV) or a new entrant, by taking away a resource that may represent a market share opportunity to a rival. The tribunal held that even if a rival might have wanted to get rights to the archive that the loss of such an opportunity does translate into a business for purposes of the Competition Act.

    All of this, the tribunal held, was not enough to allow Caxton to establish that the exclusivity granted in favour of MultiChoice constitutes a measurable and relatively permanent transfer of market share or productive capacity from SABC to MultiChoice.

    There is a clause in the agreement that says that the SABC channels carried on MultiChoice would be broadcast on an unencrypted, open access format. It was on this that the applicants relied in making their further argument that the agreement constituted a merger as they argued MultiChoice would have control of the business.

    The tribunal found the terms of the agreement were too limited in scope to justify a conclusion that MultiChoice was assuming control over SABC’s business, as the section required.

    Caxton sought, in the form of alternative relief, that the tribunal directs the commission to investigate the matter further, should it not find that the transaction amounts to a merger.

    The tribunal, therefore, found that, on the present record, the applicants have failed to  make out a case that the transaction constitutes a notifiable merger, or that it justified the commission to investigate whether it constituted a merger.  — Fin24

    Caxton Competition Commission competition tribunal DStv MultiChoice SABC
    Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn WhatsApp Telegram Email
    Previous ArticleThe trouble with Twitter
    Next Article Sona 2016 sets social media records

    Related Posts

    Standard Bank IT spending tops R10-billion in six months

    19 August 2022

    Hungry Prosus to splurge up to R30.7-billion on iFood stake

    19 August 2022

    Koeberg unit shut down due to mechanical fault

    19 August 2022
    Add A Comment

    Comments are closed.

    Promoted

    Does your contact centre have the CX factor?

    19 August 2022

    Entelek, A2pay to roll out 2 500 free Wi-Fi sites in South Africa

    18 August 2022

    Companies are drowning in data – but solutions are at hand

    18 August 2022
    Opinion

    How AI could transform financial services in emerging markets

    19 August 2022

    No reason South Africa should have a shortage of electricity: Ramaphosa

    11 July 2022

    Ntshavheni’s bias against the private sector

    8 July 2022

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the best South African technology news and analysis delivered to your e-mail inbox every morning.

    © 2009 - 2022 NewsCentral Media

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.