TechCentralTechCentral
    Facebook Twitter YouTube LinkedIn
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn YouTube
    TechCentral TechCentral
    NEWSLETTER
    • News

      It’s official: stage-6 load shedding is here

      28 June 2022

      E.tv in stunning victory over minister in digital TV fight

      28 June 2022

      Stage-6 load shedding highly likely later today

      28 June 2022

      Prosus sale plan sends Chinese tech stocks tumbling

      28 June 2022

      Takealot is ready for the Amazon onslaught: Bob van Dijk

      27 June 2022
    • World

      Ether holds its breath for the Merge

      28 June 2022

      Google Cloud customers will learn their Gmail carbon footprint

      28 June 2022

      The lights are going out for crypto’s laser-eyed grifters

      28 June 2022

      Crypto retakes $1-trillion

      27 June 2022

      Tencent slides on Prosus sale plan

      27 June 2022
    • In-depth

      The great crypto crash: the fallout, and what happens next

      22 June 2022

      Goodbye, Internet Explorer – you really won’t be missed

      19 June 2022

      Oracle’s database dominance threatened by rise of cloud-first rivals

      13 June 2022

      Everything Apple announced at WWDC – in less than 500 words

      7 June 2022

      Sheryl Sandberg’s ad empire leaves a complicated legacy

      2 June 2022
    • Podcasts

      How your organisation can triage its information security risk

      22 June 2022

      Everything PC S01E06 – ‘Apple Silicon’

      15 June 2022

      The youth might just save us

      15 June 2022

      Everything PC S01E05 – ‘Nvidia: The Green Goblin’

      8 June 2022

      Everything PC S01E04 – ‘The story of Intel – part 2’

      1 June 2022
    • Opinion

      Has South Africa’s advertising industry lost its way?

      21 June 2022

      Rob Lith: What Icasa’s spectrum auction means for SA companies

      13 June 2022

      A proposed solution to crypto’s stablecoin problem

      19 May 2022

      From spectrum to roads, why fixing SA’s problems is an uphill battle

      19 April 2022

      How AI is being deployed in the fight against cybercriminals

      8 April 2022
    • Company Hubs
      • 1-grid
      • Altron Document Solutions
      • Amplitude
      • Atvance Intellect
      • Axiz
      • BOATech
      • CallMiner
      • Digital Generation
      • E4
      • ESET
      • Euphoria Telecom
      • IBM
      • Kyocera Document Solutions
      • Microsoft
      • Nutanix
      • One Trust
      • Pinnacle
      • Skybox Security
      • SkyWire
      • Tarsus on Demand
      • Videri Digital
      • Zendesk
    • Sections
      • Banking
      • Broadcasting and Media
      • Cloud computing
      • Consumer electronics
      • Cryptocurrencies
      • Education and skills
      • Energy
      • Fintech
      • Information security
      • Internet and connectivity
      • Internet of Things
      • Investment
      • IT services
      • Motoring and transport
      • Public sector
      • Science
      • Social media
      • Talent and leadership
      • Telecoms
    • Advertise
    TechCentralTechCentral
    Home»News»Competition Commission gets competition wrong

    Competition Commission gets competition wrong

    News By Zakhele Mthembu17 March 2022
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn WhatsApp Telegram Email
    The author, Zakhele Mthembu of the Free Market Foundation

    Meta Platforms, which owns Facebook and WhatsApp, has been referred to the Competition Tribunal, to be fined 10% of its South African turnover for violating provisions of the Competition Act that prohibit the abuse of dominance by a company.

    Meta is accused of acting contrary to the provisions of the Competition Act by seeking to exclude GovChat, a private, for-profit company that describes itself as “South Africa’s official citizen/government engagement platform”.

    GovChat’s model relies on the use of another company’s resources and infrastructure in that it needs the WhatsApp Business application programming interface (API) to function. It was excluded from using it by Meta, necessitating GovChat to bring the state into the economic sphere again.

    The API that GovChat wants to forcefully use belongs to WhatsApp. It is the property of Meta

    GovChat and the commission contend that Meta ran foul of provisions of section 8 of the Competition Act by refusing to give it access to an essential facility (its API) when it was economically feasible to do so, or alternatively that it was engaging in an exclusionary act whose anticompetitive effect outweighs any technological efficiency or any other pro-competitive gain.

    Meta on the other hand, contends that GovChat did not comply with its terms of service. A spokeswoman for the company said it sought to “offboard” GovChat from its WhatsApp Business API due to continued violations of its terms concerning the abuse of users’ data by GovChat.

    The relief sought by GovChat — a private company — against Meta, another private company, is not only a punitive fine of 10% of turnover. It also seeks an interdict which would, in effect, bar Meta from doing with its property (the API) as it deems fit, and kick GovChat off should it deem it to be violating its terms of service. The Competition Tribunal is directed to declare any terms of service that seek to shield Meta from competition (as argued by GovChat) null and void.

    Voluntariness

    It has been argued before that the section 8 provisions that Meta has allegedly run foul of should be interpreted differently from the current prescriptive process that will see the invalidation of perfectly legal contractual terms. The analysis of the courts should centre on the voluntariness of the parties, their property rights and the legislative environment.

    Within the context of the legislation, Meta will most likely argue that its actions of exclusion against GovChat have a technological, efficiency or a pro-competitive gain that nullifies their anticompetitive effect. If it is true that GovChat violated terms of service it willingly subjected itself to when using Meta products and services, that would be prima facie evidence of there being other reasons for exclusion, which can be said to promote efficiency or technology with regard user data privacy, that may override the anticompetitive effects of offboarding GovChat.

    GovChat is a company that would claim to be in competition with Meta on some level. As part of its argument that convinced the commission is that Meta’s terms of service are meant to shield it from competitors. GovChat of course claims this exclusion as being unfair and illegal.

    WhatsApp is a messaging platform owned by Meta Platforms

    One is forced to ask, is there any business out there that does not try to shield itself from competition? If there isn’t, then it will not be in business long! Is there any business that would not make it so that its competitors cannot use its infrastructure to undermine their bottom line?

    The main thrust of the arguments put forward by businesses that take other business to the authorities when they fail in the market, is that government must choose winners and losers. The API that GovChat wants to forcefully use belongs to WhatsApp. It is the property of Meta. There is nothing, at least on Meta’s part, that is inhibiting GovChat from creating its own social media platform that will then in turn have its own API. GovChat is free to do this, yet it seeks to use the power of law to force others to bend to its whims.

    The question then arises: is it an exercise in justice when GovChat seeks to force Meta to let it use its property instead of developing its own?

    GovChat seeks to use its connection to government to essentially justify why it is entitled to the use of the Meta-owned API. The mentioning of grant beneficiaries communicating with the state through GovChat is meant to justify the violation of the property rights of Meta to offboard any company it wants to.

    GovChat has clearly convinced the commissioner to take its side and force its competitor to act in a way it pleases

    The tribunal will be faced with a classic abuse of dominance case: one company seeking state force to help it compete against another. The commission has chosen a side in the market between competitors, as is always the case. To reiterate, there is nothing stopping GovChat from competing with WhatsApp by building its own API. The provisions of the act it violates could be interpreted to exempt the actions of Meta from sanction, as argued above.

    The South African regulatory environment cannot afford to be hostile to any company. GovChat has clearly convinced the commissioner to take its side and force its competitor to act in a way it pleases. If the tribunal approves remedies like the interdict against offboarding GovChat and declares void  terms of service that are an exercise in property rights, then the already dim investment prospects of the nation will only dim even further.

    • Zakhele Mthembu (BA Law LLB (Wits)) is a legal researcher at the Free Market Foundation
    • The views expressed in the article are the author’s and not necessarily shared TechCentral or by members of the Free Market Foundation
    Free Market Foundation GovChat Meta Meta Platforms WhatsApp Zakhele Mthembu
    Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn WhatsApp Telegram Email
    Previous ArticleNetflix tests account sharing – at extra cost
    Next Article Tech giants at war over app store fees

    Related Posts

    It’s official: stage-6 load shedding is here

    28 June 2022

    E.tv in stunning victory over minister in digital TV fight

    28 June 2022

    Stage-6 load shedding highly likely later today

    28 June 2022
    Add A Comment

    Comments are closed.

    Promoted

    How your business can help hybrid workers effectively

    28 June 2022

    Hands off our satellite spectrum!

    27 June 2022

    Watch | Telviva One: adapting to the requirements of business

    24 June 2022
    Opinion

    Has South Africa’s advertising industry lost its way?

    21 June 2022

    Rob Lith: What Icasa’s spectrum auction means for SA companies

    13 June 2022

    A proposed solution to crypto’s stablecoin problem

    19 May 2022

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the best South African technology news and analysis delivered to your e-mail inbox every morning.

    © 2009 - 2022 NewsCentral Media

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.