TechCentralTechCentral
    Facebook Twitter YouTube LinkedIn
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn YouTube
    TechCentralTechCentral
    NEWSLETTER
    • News

      Fixing SA’s power crisis is not complex: it simply takes the will to do better

      12 August 2022

      Consortium makes unsolicited bid for state’s 40% stake in Telkom

      12 August 2022

      Actually, solar users should pay more to access the grid – here’s why

      12 August 2022

      Telkom says MTN talks remain on track

      12 August 2022

      Analysis | Rain muddies the waters with approach to Telkom

      11 August 2022
    • World

      Tencent woes mount, even after $560-billion selloff

      12 August 2022

      Huawei just booked its first sales rise since US blacklisting

      12 August 2022

      Apple remains upbeat about iPhone sales even as Android world suffers

      12 August 2022

      Ether at two-month high as upgrade to blockchain passes major test

      12 August 2022

      Gaming industry’s fortunes fade as pandemic ends

      11 August 2022
    • In-depth

      African unicorn Flutterwave battles fires on multiple fronts

      11 August 2022

      The length of Earth’s days has been increasing – and no one knows why

      7 August 2022

      As Facebook fades, the Mad Men of advertising stage a comeback

      2 August 2022

      Crypto breaks the rules. That’s the point

      27 July 2022

      E-mail scams are getting chillingly personal

      17 July 2022
    • Podcasts

      Qush on infosec: why prevention is always better than cure

      11 August 2022

      e4’s Adri Führi on encouraging more women into tech careers

      10 August 2022

      How South Africa can woo more women into tech

      4 August 2022

      Book and check-in via WhatsApp? FlySafair is on it

      28 July 2022

      Interview: Why Dell’s next-gen PowerEdge servers change the game

      28 July 2022
    • Opinion

      No reason South Africa should have a shortage of electricity: Ramaphosa

      11 July 2022

      Ntshavheni’s bias against the private sector

      8 July 2022

      South Africa can no longer rely on Eskom alone

      4 July 2022

      Has South Africa’s advertising industry lost its way?

      21 June 2022

      Rob Lith: What Icasa’s spectrum auction means for SA companies

      13 June 2022
    • Company Hubs
      • 1-grid
      • Altron Document Solutions
      • Amplitude
      • Atvance Intellect
      • Axiz
      • BOATech
      • CallMiner
      • Digital Generation
      • E4
      • ESET
      • Euphoria Telecom
      • IBM
      • Kyocera Document Solutions
      • Microsoft
      • Nutanix
      • One Trust
      • Pinnacle
      • Skybox Security
      • SkyWire
      • Tarsus on Demand
      • Videri Digital
      • Zendesk
    • Sections
      • Banking
      • Broadcasting and Media
      • Cloud computing
      • Consumer electronics
      • Cryptocurrencies
      • Education and skills
      • Energy
      • Fintech
      • Information security
      • Internet and connectivity
      • Internet of Things
      • Investment
      • IT services
      • Motoring and transport
      • Public sector
      • Science
      • Social media
      • Talent and leadership
      • Telecoms
    • Advertise
    TechCentralTechCentral
    Home»In-depth»Facebook’s present is as scary as its chequered past

    Facebook’s present is as scary as its chequered past

    In-depth By Agency Staff5 April 2018
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn WhatsApp Telegram Email

    The fresh disclosures about the Cambridge Analytica affair are dismaying for Facebook, and they were getting a lot of deserved attention on Wednesday. But what happened at the shadowy political consulting firm is largely about Facebook’s past. The company made other changes on Wednesday that highlighted how lax it is currently being in allowing access to information from the social network’s two billion users.

    The big news, of course, was that Facebook gave its first estimate of the number of accounts that may have fallen into the hands of Cambridge Analytica, a firm that worked on Donald Trump’s presidential campaign. Facebook said that number was as high as 87m people, mostly in the US, which was larger than previous media reports that suggested the firm had harvested private information from Facebook profiles of more than 50m people. (Even the 87m figure is just an estimate. Cambridge Analytica denied on Wednesday that it had received data on that many people.)

    Many more improperly obtained troves of Facebook user information could be floating out in the world from the era of lax Facebook policies

    Remember that all this started because an academic obtained permission to access the Facebook accounts of a few hundred thousand people in 2014, leveraged that to harness account information from tens of millions more people and shared the information improperly with Cambridge Analytica. Facebook changed its data collection policies a few years ago, and in theory a Cambridge Analytica-type situation couldn’t happen again. However, many more improperly obtained troves of Facebook user information could be floating out in the world from the era of lax Facebook policies. Facebook has said it will do a full analysis to root out other outsiders that harvested large volumes of Facebook user data as Cambridge Analytica did.

    The fresh revelation escalates Facebook’s nearly three-week-long crisis, which has cost the company about US$90bn in lost market capitalisation. There’s a broader revelation, however, from Facebook’s amendments to its policies disclosed on Wednesday. It shows how much account information Facebook still allows outsiders to harness, and it makes one wonder why Facebook is just now closing some of its endless series of data barn doors.

    For example, Facebook said in a post that it was ending a feature that had permitted someone to enter another person’s phone number or e-mail address into a Facebook search to find a friend or colleague. The company said it found people abused that feature to hoover the public profile information by submitting e-mails or phone numbers they already had.

    Shady data collectors

    You can imagine farms of shady data collection firms typing in your mother’s phone number, finding her Facebook profile and sucking into its databases more information about her favourite TV shows, home town and political affiliations. Needless to say, few Facebook users have ever thought about this particular misuse of information. And like many things about Facebook, this misuse may have been extremely widespread. “We believe most people on Facebook could have had their public profile scraped in this way,” Facebook’s chief technology officer wrote in his post. How is it possible that Facebook didn’t close this data loophole before now?

    And the same perplexed attitude applies to Facebook’s actions to tighten access to information for third parties, like what private events people have indicated on Facebook that they plan to attend and access to Facebook user information from apps or websites that allow people to log in using their Facebook user names and passwords. Developers will howl about these changes, and the many outside companies that rely on Facebook to reach their customers or users will be justifiably upset. But the real question is why hasn’t Facebook made these changes before now?

    Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg

    The more disturbing fact is that in some cases Facebook itself will decide whether to approve third parties’ ability to harness this social network data. Already there are questions about whether Facebook can manage these approvals case by case. And Facebook users need to ask whether the company should even make those decisions on its own.

    The result of the last 18 months of repeated Facebook scandals, including the Cambridge Analytica fracas, is that Facebook has more power than ever. Mark Zuckerberg (understandably) has made his company responsible for securing elections in the US and many other countries from improper interference. Zuckerberg has said Facebook was responsible for preventing potential ethnic violence in Myanmar. And Facebook will now be responsible for reviewing requests from third parties that want access to troves of information on two billion users.

    That’s a lot of responsibility for a company that has repeatedly behaved irresponsibly and consistently reacted with arrogance when it has been questioned.  — Reported by Shira Ovide, (c) 2018 Bloomberg LP

    Facebook Mark Zuckerberg top
    Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn WhatsApp Telegram Email
    Previous ArticleListen: Zuckerberg on Facebook’s ‘major mistake’
    Next Article Outlawing fake news will chill the real news

    Related Posts

    African unicorn Flutterwave battles fires on multiple fronts

    11 August 2022

    The length of Earth’s days has been increasing – and no one knows why

    7 August 2022

    As Facebook fades, the Mad Men of advertising stage a comeback

    2 August 2022
    Add A Comment

    Comments are closed.

    Promoted

    Get your brand in front of TechCentral’s amazing audience

    12 August 2022

    Pricing Beyond CMYK: printers answer the FAQs

    11 August 2022

    How secure is your cloud?

    10 August 2022
    Opinion

    No reason South Africa should have a shortage of electricity: Ramaphosa

    11 July 2022

    Ntshavheni’s bias against the private sector

    8 July 2022

    South Africa can no longer rely on Eskom alone

    4 July 2022

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the best South African technology news and analysis delivered to your e-mail inbox every morning.

    © 2009 - 2022 NewsCentral Media

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.