Close Menu
TechCentralTechCentral

    Subscribe to the newsletter

    Get the best South African technology news and analysis delivered to your e-mail inbox every morning.

    Facebook X (Twitter) YouTube LinkedIn
    WhatsApp Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn YouTube
    TechCentralTechCentral
    • News

      Apple plans product blitz to reignite growth

      11 July 2025

      Nissan doubles down on South Africa despite plant uncertainty

      11 July 2025

      MultiChoice is working on a wholesale overhaul of DStv

      10 July 2025

      Spam call epidemic: operators say their hands are tied

      10 July 2025

      Britehouse unit breaks free from NTT Data

      10 July 2025
    • World

      Grok 4 arrives with bold claims and fresh controversy

      10 July 2025

      Bitcoin pushes higher into record territory

      10 July 2025

      Cupertino vs Brussels: Apple challenges Big Tech crackdown

      7 July 2025

      Grammarly acquires e-mail start-up Superhuman

      1 July 2025

      Apple considers ditching its own AI in Siri overhaul

      1 July 2025
    • In-depth

      Siemens is battling Big Tech for AI supremacy in factories

      24 June 2025

      The algorithm will sing now: why musicians should be worried about AI

      20 June 2025

      Meta bets $72-billion on AI – and investors love it

      17 June 2025

      MultiChoice may unbundle SuperSport from DStv

      12 June 2025

      Grok promised bias-free chat. Then came the edits

      2 June 2025
    • TCS

      TCS | Connecting Saffas – Renier Lombard on The Lekker Network

      7 July 2025

      TechCentral Nexus S0E4: Takealot’s big Post Office jobs plan

      4 July 2025

      TCS | Tech, townships and tenacity: Spar’s plan to win with Spar2U

      3 July 2025

      TCS+ | First Distribution on the latest and greatest cloud technologies

      27 June 2025

      TCS+ | First Distribution on data governance in hybrid cloud environments

      27 June 2025
    • Opinion

      In defence of equity alternatives for BEE

      30 June 2025

      E-commerce in ICT distribution: enabler or disruptor?

      30 June 2025

      South Africa pioneered drone laws a decade ago – now it must catch up

      17 June 2025

      AI and the future of ICT distribution

      16 June 2025

      Singapore soared – why can’t we? Lessons South Africa refuses to learn

      13 June 2025
    • Company Hubs
      • Africa Data Centres
      • AfriGIS
      • Altron Digital Business
      • Altron Document Solutions
      • Altron Group
      • Arctic Wolf
      • AvertITD
      • Braintree
      • CallMiner
      • CambriLearn
      • CYBER1 Solutions
      • Digicloud Africa
      • Digimune
      • Domains.co.za
      • ESET
      • Euphoria Telecom
      • Incredible Business
      • iONLINE
      • Iris Network Systems
      • LSD Open
      • NEC XON
      • Network Platforms
      • Next DLP
      • Ovations
      • Paracon
      • Paratus
      • Q-KON
      • SevenC
      • SkyWire
      • Solid8 Technologies
      • Telit Cinterion
      • Tenable
      • Vertiv
      • Videri Digital
      • Wipro
      • Workday
    • Sections
      • AI and machine learning
      • Banking
      • Broadcasting and Media
      • Cloud services
      • Contact centres and CX
      • Cryptocurrencies
      • Education and skills
      • Electronics and hardware
      • Energy and sustainability
      • Enterprise software
      • Fintech
      • Information security
      • Internet and connectivity
      • Internet of Things
      • Investment
      • IT services
      • Lifestyle
      • Motoring
      • Public sector
      • Retail and e-commerce
      • Science
      • SMEs and start-ups
      • Social media
      • Talent and leadership
      • Telecoms
    • Events
    • Advertise
    TechCentralTechCentral
    Home » IT services » Flutter vs React Native: a comprehensive comparison

    Flutter vs React Native: a comprehensive comparison

    Promoted | Two main contenders have emerged to address the challenges of building cross-platform applications: Flutter and React Native. How do they compare?
    By Entelect27 October 2023
    Twitter LinkedIn Facebook WhatsApp Email Telegram Copy Link
    News Alerts
    WhatsApp

    In the ever-evolving landscape of mobile app development, two prominent contenders have emerged to address the challenges of building cross-platform applications: Flutter and React Native. These solutions empower developers to create mobile apps that work on iOS, Android and others, using a single set of code and saving time and effort for development teams.

    There are key differences and similarities between Flutter and React Native, including architecture and performance considerations, which need to be considered in order to make an informed choice for your next project.

    The pros and cons of Flutter and React Native

    Flutter vs React Native: key differences

    Programming language

    • Flutter: Flutter utilises Dart, an open-source object-orientated language created by Google. Dart boasts a unique feature—compilation to multiple platforms, which enhances code efficiency and performance. Additionally, Dart offers sound null safety, a feature that mitigates null-related errors and simplifies code maintenance.
    • React Native: In contrast, React Native predominantly employs JavaScript or TypeScript. This choice makes React Native more accessible to a broader developer audience, especially those familiar with web development. It builds upon React, a widely adopted UI library for creating user interfaces.

    Widgets and components

    • Flutter: At the core of Flutter’s development paradigm lies the concept that everything is a widget. Widgets in Flutter represent various UI elements, from simple buttons to complex layouts. This widget-based approach offers unparalleled modularity and customisability.
    • React Native: React Native revolves around components that are comparable to Flutter’s widgets. While React Native’s component selection may not be as extensive as Flutter’s widget catalogue, these components offer adaptability. They can detect the target platform and render platform-specific UI elements, providing developers with the flexibility needed for cross-platform development.

    UI rendering

    • Flutter: Flutter employs a proprietary graphics engine called Skia to render UIs. This approach guarantees a consistent look and behaviour across various platforms. Furthermore, Flutter compiles to native machine code, ensuring high-performance applications capable of meeting demanding graphical requirements.
    • React Native: React Native bridges the gap between JavaScript and native mobile code, rendering truly native components. However, the divergence in platform-specific UI designs may necessitate manual configuration to maintain visual consistency across different platforms.

    Architecture

    • Flutter: Flutter adopts a widget-based architecture, with the widgets organised into a hierarchical structure. This approach enables developers to compose complex user interfaces with smaller, reusable widgets. Flutter’s single-threaded event loop efficiently manages UI updates, ensuring a consistent and performant user experience.
    • React Native: React Native follows an architecture inspired by React, known as the Virtual DOM. It uses JavaScript to interact with native modules and components through a bridge. The Virtual DOM helps optimise UI updates by reducing direct interactions with native elements. React Native leverages multiple threads for tasks such as rendering and executing JavaScript code, enhancing performance.

    Performance

    • Flutter: Flutter is renowned for its exceptional performance. It compiles Dart code to native machine code, eliminating the need for a JavaScript bridge. This compilation results in fast start-up times, smooth animations and consistent UI rendering across platforms. Flutter’s performance makes it well-suited for applications with demanding graphic requirements or animations.
    • React Native: React Native offers native-like performance, but it relies on a JavaScript bridge to communicate with native modules. While this bridge introduces a slight overhead, it is generally imperceptible to users in most applications. React Native optimises performance through features like the Virtual DOM, which reduces unnecessary UI updates. However, in scenarios where maximum performance is critical, Flutter’s ahead-of-time compilation provides a slight edge.

    Key similarities

    Native performance

    While subtle performance differences exist between the two frameworks, both Flutter and React Native are designed to deliver native-level performance. Flutter achieves this through its compilation to native machine code, while React Native integrates native components to optimise performance. In practical terms, users can expect responsive and fluid applications developed with either framework.

    Community and ecosystem

    Both Flutter and React Native boast vibrant and active communities. These communities provide a wealth of resources, tutorials, and third-party packages, making it easier for developers to access the knowledge and support needed to expedite their projects.

    Argument for Flutter

    Flutter offers superb performance and consistency. One of Flutter’s standout features is its unparalleled performance and visual consistency across platforms. By compiling Dart code to native machine code, Flutter eliminates the need for a JavaScript bridge, resulting in exceptionally fast start-up times and smooth animations. Developers can rely on Flutter to deliver a consistently high level of performance on iOS, Android, and other supported platforms.

    Widgets for customisation and reusability: Flutter’s widget-based architecture promotes modularity, customisability, and code reusability. Everything in Flutter is a widget, allowing developers to build complex user interfaces by composing smaller, reusable widgets. This level of granularity empowers developers to create unique and intricate UIs while maintaining code clarity.

    Robust community and active development: Flutter benefits from strong support by Google and an active open-source community. Google’s backing ensures regular updates, improvements and long-term support for the framework. The community’s collective expertise contributes to Flutter’s growth and evolution. Developers can tap into a wealth of resources, tutorials and third-party packages, making it easier to access the knowledge and tools required to accelerate their projects.

    Argument for React Native

    Accessibility and familiarity for web developers: React Native’s primary advantage lies in its accessibility and the familiarity it offers to web developers. Leveraging JavaScript or TypeScript, React Native is an attractive choice for developers who have experience with web development and React. This familiarity facilitates a smooth transition to mobile app development, enabling web developers to apply their existing skills to create cross-platform applications.

    Integration with platform-specific features: React Native seamlessly integrates with platform-specific features and device capabilities. It provides native modules that allow developers to access native functionalities directly. This level of integration is crucial for applications that require deep interaction with device features, such as accessing a camera, sensors or Bluetooth. React Native empowers developers to harness the full potential of each platform while maintaining cross-platform compatibility.

    Versatility for diverse platform requirements: React Native’s versatility shines when building applications across various platforms. Its ability to adapt to different platform guidelines, including material design for Android and Cupertino for iOS, ensures that the resulting applications feel native to each platform’s user base. This versatility makes React Native a strong contender for projects that prioritise platform-specific user experiences while minimising development effort and time.

    Conclusion

    In summary, Flutter and React Native stand as formidable choices for cross-platform mobile app development, each offering a unique set of strengths and capabilities. The decision between the two should align closely with your project’s specific requirements, your development team’s expertise and your overarching priorities. To make an informed choice, carefully evaluate your project’s needs and goals. By selecting the framework that best aligns with your development objectives, you’ll be well-prepared to embark on a cross-platform mobile application development journey that not only meets, but exceeds, your expectations.

    • Read more articles by Entelect on TechCentral
    • This promoted content was paid for by the party concerned


    Entelect Flutter Flutter vs React Native React Native
    Subscribe to TechCentral Subscribe to TechCentral
    Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn WhatsApp Telegram Email Copy Link
    Previous ArticleBlack Friday to create an extra R26.6-billion in retail turnover
    Next Article iKhokha, Shopstar pave the way for simpler e-commerce

    Related Posts

    Entelect: an unwavering emphasis on growth

    21 February 2024

    Entelect releases research on the future of payments in SA

    7 August 2023

    How the blockchain could put an end to identity theft

    3 November 2017
    Add A Comment

    Comments are closed.

    Company News

    LTE Cat 1 vs Cat 1 bis – what’s the difference?

    11 July 2025

    NEC XON welcomes HPE acquisition of Juniper Networks

    11 July 2025

    AI in project management: a new era of efficiency and transformation

    10 July 2025
    Opinion

    In defence of equity alternatives for BEE

    30 June 2025

    E-commerce in ICT distribution: enabler or disruptor?

    30 June 2025

    South Africa pioneered drone laws a decade ago – now it must catch up

    17 June 2025

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the best South African technology news and analysis delivered to your e-mail inbox every morning.

    © 2009 - 2025 NewsCentral Media

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.