TechCentralTechCentral
    Facebook Twitter YouTube LinkedIn
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn YouTube
    TechCentralTechCentral
    NEWSLETTER
    • News

      Google’s giant Equiano Internet cable has landed in South Africa

      8 August 2022

      The African tech start-ups eyeing global markets

      8 August 2022

      Karpowership loses bid to overturn environmental ruling

      8 August 2022

      New app launched to tackle potholes in South Africa

      8 August 2022

      Rogue database felled Capitec in its worst-ever IT outage

      7 August 2022
    • World

      Nvidia issues profit warning on slump in demand for graphics cards

      8 August 2022

      Buterin: Mining on Ethereum Classic won’t affect Merge

      8 August 2022

      Musk challenges Twitter CEO to a public debate

      7 August 2022

      Amazon splashes $1.7-billion on Roomba maker iRobot

      5 August 2022

      Nigeria asks Google to block banned groups from YouTube

      5 August 2022
    • In-depth

      The length of Earth’s days has been increasing – and no one knows why

      7 August 2022

      As Facebook fades, the Mad Men of advertising stage a comeback

      2 August 2022

      Crypto breaks the rules. That’s the point

      27 July 2022

      E-mail scams are getting chillingly personal

      17 July 2022

      Webb telescope’s stunning images of the cosmos

      12 July 2022
    • Podcasts

      How South Africa can woo more women into tech

      4 August 2022

      Book and check-in via WhatsApp? FlySafair is on it

      28 July 2022

      Interview: Why Dell’s next-gen PowerEdge servers change the game

      28 July 2022

      Demystifying the complexity of AI – fact vs fiction

      6 July 2022

      How your organisation can triage its information security risk

      22 June 2022
    • Opinion

      SIU seeks to set aside R215-million IT tender

      19 July 2022

      No reason South Africa should have a shortage of electricity: Ramaphosa

      11 July 2022

      Ntshavheni’s bias against the private sector

      8 July 2022

      South Africa can no longer rely on Eskom alone

      4 July 2022

      Has South Africa’s advertising industry lost its way?

      21 June 2022
    • Company Hubs
      • 1-grid
      • Altron Document Solutions
      • Amplitude
      • Atvance Intellect
      • Axiz
      • BOATech
      • CallMiner
      • Digital Generation
      • E4
      • ESET
      • Euphoria Telecom
      • IBM
      • Kyocera Document Solutions
      • Microsoft
      • Nutanix
      • One Trust
      • Pinnacle
      • Skybox Security
      • SkyWire
      • Tarsus on Demand
      • Videri Digital
      • Zendesk
    • Sections
      • Banking
      • Broadcasting and Media
      • Cloud computing
      • Consumer electronics
      • Cryptocurrencies
      • Education and skills
      • Energy
      • Fintech
      • Information security
      • Internet and connectivity
      • Internet of Things
      • Investment
      • IT services
      • Motoring and transport
      • Public sector
      • Science
      • Social media
      • Talent and leadership
      • Telecoms
    • Advertise
    TechCentralTechCentral
    Home»World»Google slams antitrust regulators for ignoring Apple

    Google slams antitrust regulators for ignoring Apple

    World By Agency Staff27 September 2021
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn WhatsApp Telegram Email

    Google on Monday criticised EU antitrust regulators for ignoring rival Apple as it launched a bid to get Europe’s second highest court to annul a record €4.3-billion (R76.4-billion) fine related to its Android operating system.

    Far from holding back rivals and harming users, Android has been a massive success story of competition at work, representatives of Google told a panel of five judges at the general court in Luxembourg at the start of a five-day hearing.

    The European Commission fined Google in 2018, saying that it had used Android since 2011 to thwart rivals and cement its dominance in general Internet search.

    The Commission shut its eyes to the real competitive dynamic in this industry…

    “The commission shut its eyes to the real competitive dynamic in this industry, that between Apple and Android,” Google’s lawyer, Matthew Pickford, told the court.

    “By defining markets too narrowly and downplaying the potent constraint imposed by the highly powerful Apple, the commission has mistakenly found Google to be dominant in mobile operating systems and app stores, when it was in fact a vigorous market disrupter,” he said.

    Pickford said Android “is an exceptional success story of the power of competition in action”.

    ‘Different models’

    Commission lawyer Nicholas Khan dismissed Apple’s role because of its small market share compared with Android. “Bringing Apple into the picture doesn’t change things very much. Google and Apple pursue different models,” he told the court.

    “Google’s conduct denied any opportunity for competition,” he said, citing agreements which forced phone manufacturers to pre-install Google Search, the Chrome browser and the Google Play app store on their Android devices, and payments to pre-install only Google Search.

    Android, free for device makers to use, is found on about 80% of the world’s smartphones. The case is the most important of the European Union’s three cases against Google because of Android’s market power. Google has racked up more than €8-billion in EU antitrust fines in the last decade.

    It hooked them on a supposedly free and open-source operating system subsidised by its search monopoly, only to shut that system to competition

    German phone maker Gigaset Communications, which is backing Google, said its success was due to Android’s open platform and lamented the negative impact of the commission’s decision on its business.

    “The licence fee for the Play Store that Google now charges as a result of the contested decision represents a significant portion of the price of Gigaset’s smartphones aimed at price-sensitive consumers,” its lawyer, Jean-François Bellis, told the court.

    Lobbying group FairSearch, whose complaint triggered the commission case, was however scathing about Google’s tactics with phone makers.

    “Google adopted a classic bait-and-switch strategy. It hooked them on a supposedly free and open-source operating system subsidised by its search monopoly, only to shut that system to competition through the web of restrictions at issue in this case,” its lawyer, Thomas Vinje, told the court.

    A verdict may come next year.  — Reported by Foo Yun Chee, (c) 2021 Reuters

    Apple Google
    Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn WhatsApp Telegram Email
    Previous ArticleZuckerberg checks out as Facebook challenges pile up
    Next Article China says Xi gave personal orders on handling of Huawei case

    Related Posts

    Google’s giant Equiano Internet cable has landed in South Africa

    8 August 2022

    The African tech start-ups eyeing global markets

    8 August 2022

    Nvidia issues profit warning on slump in demand for graphics cards

    8 August 2022
    Add A Comment

    Comments are closed.

    Promoted

    You don’t need a call centre to take advantage of call centre technology

    5 August 2022

    Black man, you are still on your own

    5 August 2022

    UC&C interoperability offers businesses operational cost relief in tough times

    4 August 2022
    Opinion

    SIU seeks to set aside R215-million IT tender

    19 July 2022

    No reason South Africa should have a shortage of electricity: Ramaphosa

    11 July 2022

    Ntshavheni’s bias against the private sector

    8 July 2022

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the best South African technology news and analysis delivered to your e-mail inbox every morning.

    © 2009 - 2022 NewsCentral Media

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.