TechCentralTechCentral
    Facebook Twitter YouTube LinkedIn
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn YouTube
    TechCentral TechCentral
    NEWSLETTER
    • News

      Reserve Bank eyes digital rand as it readies crypto regulations

      19 May 2022

      E.tv parent eMedia leaps higher on surge in profits

      18 May 2022

      Growth evaporates at Tencent, and worse may be to come

      18 May 2022

      Tencent in big revenue miss – Naspers, Prosus tumble

      18 May 2022

      Crypto can complement mobile money in Africa, top banker says

      18 May 2022
    • World

      Musk says he will vote Republican, calls ESG a ‘scam’

      19 May 2022

      Crypto crash leaves El Salvador in a pickle

      19 May 2022

      Tencent leads big China tech selloff

      19 May 2022

      Russia seizes Google’s bank account, forcing bankruptcy

      18 May 2022

      Sony says it will play a leading role in the metaverse

      18 May 2022
    • In-depth

      Elon Musk is becoming like Henry Ford – and that’s not a good thing

      17 May 2022

      Stablecoins wend wobbly way into the unknown

      17 May 2022

      The standard model of particle physics may be broken

      11 May 2022

      Meet Jared Birchall, Elon Musk’s personal ‘fixer’

      6 May 2022

      Twitter takeover was brash and fast, with Musk calling the shots

      26 April 2022
    • Podcasts

      Dean Broadley on why product design at Yoco is an evolving art

      18 May 2022

      Everything PC S01E02 – ‘AMD: Ryzen from the dead – part 2’

      17 May 2022

      Everything PC S01E01 – ‘AMD: Ryzen from the dead – part 1’

      10 May 2022

      Llew Claasen on how exchange controls are harming SA tech start-ups

      2 May 2022

      The inside scoop on OVEX’s big expansion plans

      20 April 2022
    • Opinion

      From spectrum to roads, why fixing SA’s problems is an uphill battle

      19 April 2022

      How AI is being deployed in the fight against cybercriminals

      8 April 2022

      Cash is still king … but not for much longer

      31 March 2022

      Icasa on the role of TV white spaces and dynamic spectrum access

      31 March 2022

      Minister Ntshavheni is at risk of tripping up

      24 March 2022
    • Company Hubs
      • 1-grid
      • Altron Document Solutions
      • Amplitude
      • Atvance Intellect
      • Axiz
      • BOATech
      • CallMiner
      • Digital Generation
      • E4
      • ESET
      • Euphoria Telecom
      • IBM
      • Kyocera Document Solutions
      • Microsoft
      • Nutanix
      • One Trust
      • Pinnacle
      • Skybox Security
      • SkyWire
      • Tarsus on Demand
      • Videri Digital
      • Zendesk
    • Sections
      • Banking
      • Broadcasting and Media
      • Cloud computing
      • Consumer electronics
      • Cryptocurrencies
      • Education and skills
      • Energy
      • Fintech
      • Information security
      • Internet and connectivity
      • Internet of Things
      • Investment
      • IT services
      • Motoring and transport
      • Public sector
      • Science
      • Social media
      • Talent and leadership
      • Telecoms
    • Advertise
    TechCentralTechCentral
    Home»In-depth»Is Rain really worth as much as Telkom?

    Is Rain really worth as much as Telkom?

    In-depth By Keith McLachlan20 September 2021
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn WhatsApp Telegram Email

    African Rainbow Capital (ARC) reported its full-year results for 2021 last week. The group reported a 16.3% rise in its so-called intrinsic portfolio value to R12.3-billion, albeit that once the recent dilutive capital raise is excluded, the group saw its intrinsic net asset value (INAV) fall 8.1% year on year.

    Plenty has been written about this holding company’s expensive external management company and the fees it charges, so I won’t revisit this other than to suggest that investors looking for an appropriate discount for this holding company do the maths.

    What I want to focus on is its investment in Rain, the young and fast-growing data-only telecommunications start-up.

    That is the nature of telecoms: You have to keep spending vast amounts of capex just to stay in the game

    Firstly, it is great to see this telecommunications operator hitting its targets. Significantly helped by lockdown-induced consumer demand for data for remote working, gaming and the like, Rain appears to be performing really well. I say “appears” because we know very little about it. No separate numbers or even subscriber statistics are released.

    In ARC’s presentation on its results, management did reference that it is Ebitda (earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation)-positive and, in the absence of the cost of the 5G roll-out, would be doing much better.

    Largest exposure

    But that is the nature of telecoms operators: You have to keep spending vast amounts of capex just to stay in the game. Can we really exclude 5G capex from Rain’s performance, cash flows and profits, or is it just the cost of keeping a seat at the operators’ table? Is it really “expansionary” capex if you need to spend to remain relevant?

    Secondly, ARC wrote up Rain’s fair value in its INAV and the company remains its largest single exposure — in the region of a whopping 27% its portfolio This large weighting of Rain in ARC’s portfolio makes the lack of detailed disclosure even more bizarre and frustrating.

    So, how reasonable is ARC’s valuation of Rain? Well, we have no idea — we just have to trust management — but I can highlight two interesting facts to give us some much-needed context:

    1. Rain’s valuation is higher (partly) due to a lower discount rate: Rain is valued used the discounted free cash flow methodology. As an early-stage, fast-growing and likely free-cash-flow-negative business, this methodology makes sense. A key input here, though, is the discount rate used. Simply put, for the exact same free cash flows, a lower discount rate will arrive at a higher valuation, and vice versa. In FY20, ARC used a discount rate of 17.25%, but in FY21 this discount rate has been lowered to 15.26%. That is quite a large drop in this discount rate and, surely, is a material contributor to the higher fair value of Rain in ARC’s INAV. I would argue that if this is the case, then this ‘growth in fair value is particularly low quality.
    2. Rain’s valuation implies that it is almost the same size as Telkom: ARC’s R3.3-billion fair value for its 20.2% shareholding in Rain is after respective around 12.5% minority and marketability (liquidity) discounts. While we will keep the minority discount (this will make sense later), if we add back the marketability discount and then gross the fair value up to 100%, we get what the implied “market cap” for Rain should be if it was listed on the JSE. (We keep the minority discount because JSE share prices reflect what minorities are willing to pay for small stakes in companies, thus this discount is still applicable even for a listed company’s shares.) Doing this maths, Rain’s implied listed market cap should be around R18.8-billion. To view this in context, Telkom has a market cap of only R18.6-billion. Can Rain really be worth more than Telkom’s entire operations and its more than 26 million subscribers? Furthermore, if we look at Blue Label Telecoms’ carrying value of its investment in Cell C, it is currently worth zero on its books. Cell C has 12.3 million subscribers.

    How many subscribers does Rain have?

    The last data point we have was some months ago that they were signing up between 60 000 and 80 000 subscribers per month. Even if we assume they are now signing 100 000 per month and have been for the last five years (unrealistic, I know), this still only implies that Rain would have around six million subscribers, which is far short of both the above-noted (and lower-valued) tertiary operators. Thus, Rain’s valuation just looks odd.

    So, while plenty has been spoken around ARC’s fee structure, not enough has been asked about its valuation of Rain. While Rain does sound like it is performing well, is it performing well enough to justify the valuation that has been attached to it?

    • This article was originally published by Moneyweb and is used by TechCentral with permission

    Now read: Rain targets 2 000 5G towers as valuation hits R17.1-billion

    African Rainbow Capital ARC Investments Blue Label Telecoms Cell C Keith McLachlan Rain Telkom
    Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn WhatsApp Telegram Email
    Previous ArticleSlumping bitcoin, S&P 500 are moving increasingly in tandem
    Next Article Spectrum crisis: It’s time for the new minister to show her mettle

    Related Posts

    Musk says he will vote Republican, calls ESG a ‘scam’

    19 May 2022

    Reserve Bank eyes digital rand as it readies crypto regulations

    19 May 2022

    Crypto crash leaves El Salvador in a pickle

    19 May 2022
    Add A Comment

    Comments are closed.

    Promoted

    Putting IT monitoring on the spot

    18 May 2022

    OVEX obliterates cryptocurrency fees – 3% better prices than competitors

    18 May 2022

    Detect and prioritise cloud security risks in minutes, not months

    17 May 2022
    Opinion

    From spectrum to roads, why fixing SA’s problems is an uphill battle

    19 April 2022

    How AI is being deployed in the fight against cybercriminals

    8 April 2022

    Cash is still king … but not for much longer

    31 March 2022

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the best South African technology news and analysis delivered to your e-mail inbox every morning.

    © 2009 - 2022 NewsCentral Media

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.