Karpowership, the world’s biggest supplier of floating gas-fired power plants, said some South African government agencies have stalled its projects and their conduct isn’t conducive to creating an attractive investment environment.

The Turkish company in March last year won the right to supply South Africa with 1 220MW of electricity, or more than 60% of a so-called emergency tender designed to ease intermittent power outages. The 20-year deal was valued at R218-billion at the time.

It’s yet to get environmental approvals or permission to use port space, faces an indemnity demand from Eskom, and is embroiled in court cases with environmental activists and a rival. While some other bidders are due to conclude power-purchase agreements with Eskom and the energy department on Thursday, Karpowership has been told it won’t be signing at this stage.

There are “notable examples of authorities whose conduct isn’t aligned with the purpose” of the power programme, Karpowership said, citing a lack of transparency and urgency. “We expect the government to work together cohesively to unblock the few remaining bottlenecks preventing the delivery of our projects,” it said in a statement.

Its projects will entail R20-billion of investment and create several hundred jobs, the company said, adding it has already spent R400-million on applications and established an office in Johannesburg.

Karpowership listed the obstacles as follows:

The failure by the department of environmental Affairs to rule on a 13 July appeal filed against its 23 June refusal to grant Karpowership environmental clearance. Karpowership said the appeal process should have legally been completed within 120 days but it has been told a decision can’t be expected before 1 July.
The departments of transport and public enterprises have yet to make a decision on whether the company’s ships will be allowed to moor at the nation’s ports. An application was made on 12 May 2021.
Eskom on 23 March demanded that Karpowership sign a “wide-reaching, open-ended indemnity agreement” that “potentially renders the projects unbankable”. Karpowership hasn’t received a response to a proposal it submitted to Eskom. The other bidders weren’t asked to do the same.
A high court decision allowing DNG Power Holdings to appeal a ruling dismissing its allegations that Karpowership’s contract was tainted by corruption.
Separate court cases filed by the Organisation Undoing Tax Abuse (Outa) and The Green Connection against the National Energy Regulator of South Africa, or Nersa, for granting Karpowership generation permits on the last day they were legally permitted to oppose the award.

Eskom and the departments of environmental affairs, transport and public enterprises didn’t immediately respond to requests for comment. Stefanie Fick, head of legal affairs at Outa, and Liziwe McDaid, a board member at The Green Connection, denied coordinating their lawsuits, saying they had weighed whether it was worth the expense of filing cases.

Karpowership said it worked well with the department of mineral resources & energy, Nersa and Transnet National Ports Authority.

Environmental concerns

Activists say Karpowership’s plants will damage the environment and affect fishing. They also allege that the use of natural gas, especially over 20 years, will undermine South Africa’s aim of cutting greenhouse-gas emissions.

Other companies that won emergency power supply contracts include TotalEnergies, Électricité de France, Scatec and Acwa Power. The project TotalEnergies is backing also uses liquefied natural gas.

Karpowership said it received no reply from the government to its offer to have senior management make presentations explaining its projects, which were initially supposed to begin producing power in August. It said it had won all necessary approvals and will start delivering 563MW of power in Brazil in July, 10 months after winning a similar bid in that country. — (c) 2022 Bloomberg LP