TechCentralTechCentral
    Facebook Twitter YouTube LinkedIn
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn YouTube
    TechCentral TechCentral
    NEWSLETTER
    • News

      It’s official: stage-6 load shedding is here

      28 June 2022

      E.tv in stunning victory over minister in digital TV fight

      28 June 2022

      Stage-6 load shedding highly likely later today

      28 June 2022

      Prosus sale plan sends Chinese tech stocks tumbling

      28 June 2022

      Takealot is ready for the Amazon onslaught: Bob van Dijk

      27 June 2022
    • World

      Ether holds its breath for the Merge

      28 June 2022

      Google Cloud customers will learn their Gmail carbon footprint

      28 June 2022

      The lights are going out for crypto’s laser-eyed grifters

      28 June 2022

      Crypto retakes $1-trillion

      27 June 2022

      Tencent slides on Prosus sale plan

      27 June 2022
    • In-depth

      The great crypto crash: the fallout, and what happens next

      22 June 2022

      Goodbye, Internet Explorer – you really won’t be missed

      19 June 2022

      Oracle’s database dominance threatened by rise of cloud-first rivals

      13 June 2022

      Everything Apple announced at WWDC – in less than 500 words

      7 June 2022

      Sheryl Sandberg’s ad empire leaves a complicated legacy

      2 June 2022
    • Podcasts

      How your organisation can triage its information security risk

      22 June 2022

      Everything PC S01E06 – ‘Apple Silicon’

      15 June 2022

      The youth might just save us

      15 June 2022

      Everything PC S01E05 – ‘Nvidia: The Green Goblin’

      8 June 2022

      Everything PC S01E04 – ‘The story of Intel – part 2’

      1 June 2022
    • Opinion

      Has South Africa’s advertising industry lost its way?

      21 June 2022

      Rob Lith: What Icasa’s spectrum auction means for SA companies

      13 June 2022

      A proposed solution to crypto’s stablecoin problem

      19 May 2022

      From spectrum to roads, why fixing SA’s problems is an uphill battle

      19 April 2022

      How AI is being deployed in the fight against cybercriminals

      8 April 2022
    • Company Hubs
      • 1-grid
      • Altron Document Solutions
      • Amplitude
      • Atvance Intellect
      • Axiz
      • BOATech
      • CallMiner
      • Digital Generation
      • E4
      • ESET
      • Euphoria Telecom
      • IBM
      • Kyocera Document Solutions
      • Microsoft
      • Nutanix
      • One Trust
      • Pinnacle
      • Skybox Security
      • SkyWire
      • Tarsus on Demand
      • Videri Digital
      • Zendesk
    • Sections
      • Banking
      • Broadcasting and Media
      • Cloud computing
      • Consumer electronics
      • Cryptocurrencies
      • Education and skills
      • Energy
      • Fintech
      • Information security
      • Internet and connectivity
      • Internet of Things
      • Investment
      • IT services
      • Motoring and transport
      • Public sector
      • Science
      • Social media
      • Talent and leadership
      • Telecoms
    • Advertise
    TechCentralTechCentral
    Home»In-depth»Koos Bekker needs a lesson in corporate governance

    Koos Bekker needs a lesson in corporate governance

    In-depth By Patrick Cairns29 August 2017
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn WhatsApp Telegram Email
    Koos Bekker

    South Africa has a leadership problem. Our president and many members of his cabinet are so deeply compromised, that they are simply unable to be effective.

    This problem has been allowed to fester because nobody has held these members of the executive to account. Even a constitutional court ruling that that president had violated his oath of office failed to inspire the ruling party or parliament to act against him.

    The impact that the Zuma presidency has had on the local economy is so severe that it would be extraordinary if any senior South African business executive outside of the Gupta family disagreed with the above assessment. They have felt the effects of this failure of governance too acutely to be indifferent about it.

    Bekker made his opinion clear that while corporate governance might ‘sound wonderful’, it is not core to a company’s success

    This is why one has to scrutinise the response by Naspers chairman Koos Bekker to questions around corporate governance at the company’s AGM last week. Bekker had little time for shareholders who voiced their concerns about a number of issues, all of which boiled down to accountability.

    Bekker made his opinion clear that while corporate governance might “sound wonderful”, it is not core to a company’s success. In fact, he suggested that as long as a company is doing well, the state of its corporate governance doesn’t matter.

    And nobody would deny that Naspers is a company that is doing extraordinarily well. Shareholders have been hugely rewarded for holding its stock.

    Outstanding returns

    On the face of it, this supports Bekker’s argument. The directors have delivered outstanding returns, and that, it’s fair to say, is what they are most accountable for.

    But here’s the problem. When Nelson Mandela was president of South Africa and the country was running well, very few people questioned parliament’s lack of appetite for fulfilling its oversight role. It didn’t matter very much then.

    The Naspers head office in Cape Town, as seen using Google Earth

    Similarly, when African Bank was performing so strongly that it had grown into one of the top 40 companies on the JSE, few people raised their concerns about its essentially dysfunctional board. When things did start doing wrong, it was already too late.

    There are some noteworthy international cases, too. One of the largest was the US$1.7bn fraud at Japanese camera maker Olympus. The company was able to hide losses for 13 years because its president colluded with his fellow executives and there was no independent oversight of what they were up to.

    When shareholders call for greater accountability at Naspers, they are not doing so because they think they can run the company better than its current executives

    It would be silly to suggest that Naspers is doomed to go the same way as African Bank or Olympus, but the lessons shouldn’t be ignored. Good governance might be nice-to-have when things are rosy, but when the wheel turns, it’s pretty critical.

    So when shareholders call for greater accountability at Naspers, they are not doing so because they think they can run the company better than its current executives. Anyone who has invested in Naspers must be pretty happy in general with the way that it conducts business.

    What they want, however, is greater comfort about the sustainability of its performance. They want directors to be rewarded for producing results in areas that they actually have control over, and they want greater confidence about who really controls the company and whether conflicts of interest are being properly managed.

    It’s critical to bear in mind that Naspers has a dual-class share structure. Each of its A shares, which are tightly held, carries a thousand votes per share. The company’s N shares, which trade on the JSE, carry one vote each.

    Remuneration policy

    Taking that into consideration, it’s important to note that the remuneration policy was not the only resolution that shareholders voted against in noticeable numbers at the Naspers AGM. There were five other controversial resolutions that also drew resistance – two of them involved the potential issuing of additional A shares, and another about the repurchase of A shares that could result in conflicts of interest as Naspers didn’t specify how the price of those shares would be determined.

    As the holders of A shares effectively control the company, and Bekker himself is a significant indirect holder, these are not insignificant matters. Who is performing oversight, and how?

    The challenge is that 68% of Naspers voting rights vest with holders of the company’s A shares. As they tend to vote as a block, it is almost impossible for the N shareholders to ever vote a resolution down.

    If you think that sounds a lot like the state of South Africa’s parliament when it comes to their response to the president, then you will understand why a significant majority of N shareholders voted against the two most controversial resolutions at the company’s AGM.

    Nobody is accusing Naspers, its directors or Bekker of any impropriety. In fact, it’s hard to imagine that any shareholder isn’t hugely grateful to the chairman and his team.

    But at the same time, as owners of the company, shareholders do have every right to expect accountability. Not because things will definitely go wrong if it isn’t there, but because if things do go wrong you are dead in the water without it.

    • This piece was originally published on Moneyweb and is used here with permission
    Koos Bekker Naspers Patrick Cairns top
    Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn WhatsApp Telegram Email
    Previous ArticleGoogle delivers an answer to Apple on AR
    Next Article Ranked: SA’s best mobile broadband networks

    Related Posts

    Takealot is ready for the Amazon onslaught: Bob van Dijk

    27 June 2022

    Beggars can’t be choosers: Naspers moves to appease shareholders

    27 June 2022

    Prosus nets R58-billion in JD.com stake sale

    27 June 2022
    Add A Comment

    Comments are closed.

    Promoted

    How your business can help hybrid workers effectively

    28 June 2022

    Hands off our satellite spectrum!

    27 June 2022

    Watch | Telviva One: adapting to the requirements of business

    24 June 2022
    Opinion

    Has South Africa’s advertising industry lost its way?

    21 June 2022

    Rob Lith: What Icasa’s spectrum auction means for SA companies

    13 June 2022

    A proposed solution to crypto’s stablecoin problem

    19 May 2022

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the best South African technology news and analysis delivered to your e-mail inbox every morning.

    © 2009 - 2022 NewsCentral Media

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.