TechCentralTechCentral
    Facebook Twitter YouTube LinkedIn
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn YouTube
    TechCentralTechCentral
    NEWSLETTER
    • News

      Consortium makes unsolicited bid for state’s 40% stake in Telkom

      12 August 2022

      Actually, solar users should pay more to access the grid – here’s why

      12 August 2022

      Fixing SA’s power crisis is not complex: it simply takes the will to do better

      12 August 2022

      Telkom says MTN talks remain on track

      12 August 2022

      Analysis | Rain muddies the waters with approach to Telkom

      11 August 2022
    • World

      Apple remains upbeat about iPhone sales even as Android world suffers

      12 August 2022

      Ether at two-month high as upgrade to blockchain passes major test

      12 August 2022

      Gaming industry’s fortunes fade as pandemic ends

      11 August 2022

      Disney tops Netflix in streaming subscribers

      11 August 2022

      Jumia says it’s past peak losses, shares jump

      10 August 2022
    • In-depth

      African unicorn Flutterwave battles fires on multiple fronts

      11 August 2022

      The length of Earth’s days has been increasing – and no one knows why

      7 August 2022

      As Facebook fades, the Mad Men of advertising stage a comeback

      2 August 2022

      Crypto breaks the rules. That’s the point

      27 July 2022

      E-mail scams are getting chillingly personal

      17 July 2022
    • Podcasts

      Qush on infosec: why prevention is always better than cure

      11 August 2022

      e4’s Adri Führi on encouraging more women into tech careers

      10 August 2022

      How South Africa can woo more women into tech

      4 August 2022

      Book and check-in via WhatsApp? FlySafair is on it

      28 July 2022

      Interview: Why Dell’s next-gen PowerEdge servers change the game

      28 July 2022
    • Opinion

      No reason South Africa should have a shortage of electricity: Ramaphosa

      11 July 2022

      Ntshavheni’s bias against the private sector

      8 July 2022

      South Africa can no longer rely on Eskom alone

      4 July 2022

      Has South Africa’s advertising industry lost its way?

      21 June 2022

      Rob Lith: What Icasa’s spectrum auction means for SA companies

      13 June 2022
    • Company Hubs
      • 1-grid
      • Altron Document Solutions
      • Amplitude
      • Atvance Intellect
      • Axiz
      • BOATech
      • CallMiner
      • Digital Generation
      • E4
      • ESET
      • Euphoria Telecom
      • IBM
      • Kyocera Document Solutions
      • Microsoft
      • Nutanix
      • One Trust
      • Pinnacle
      • Skybox Security
      • SkyWire
      • Tarsus on Demand
      • Videri Digital
      • Zendesk
    • Sections
      • Banking
      • Broadcasting and Media
      • Cloud computing
      • Consumer electronics
      • Cryptocurrencies
      • Education and skills
      • Energy
      • Fintech
      • Information security
      • Internet and connectivity
      • Internet of Things
      • Investment
      • IT services
      • Motoring and transport
      • Public sector
      • Science
      • Social media
      • Talent and leadership
      • Telecoms
    • Advertise
    TechCentralTechCentral
    Home»Opinion»Liza Zouabi»McLeod is wrong about Telkom

    McLeod is wrong about Telkom

    Liza Zouabi By Liza Zouabi19 August 2021
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn WhatsApp Telegram Email

    Telkom would like to take up the offer to publish a reply to TechCentral editor Duncan McLeod’s column of 16 August on the company’s opposition to the MTN and Vodacom duopoly in South Africa.

    We believe that McLeod has overlooked key aspects of Telkom’s argument for a fair playing field in the telecommunications sector and a pro-consumer approach to regulation and oversight.

    At the same time, we respect his commitment to a healthy and functional marketplace, as evidenced by his joining the Capitalist Party of South Africa (the “Purple Cow”), which flopped in the last national election. Better luck next time!

    For the record, we share his views on free and fair markets. However, we wish to raise some points in this regard.

    Distinguish between the old and new Telkom

    Telkom is a vastly different business to the one it was in 1994 when it was a state-owned enterprise and the only telecommunications operator in town. Today Telkom is highly diversified, profitable, competitive, efficient and – if we say so ourselves – well led. Capitalists should be cheering!

    McLeod’s column suggests that because Telkom was once the monopoly — prior to democracy — that somehow regulation of our business should be based on retribution, not fair market practice. So-called “light-touch” regulation has entrenched the duopoly, rather than allowing new entrants a fair chance.

    Consider that mobile services were launched in 1994, granting MTN and Vodacom a head-start. Yet, despite the regulator allowing entry by other operators, their dominance has persisted. Together, MTN and Vodacom account for about 75% of subscribers – and an even larger slice of revenue. Vodacom’s share has hovered around 42% for the past 10 years, whereas MTN, the largest African mobile network’s share, has decreased, but not significantly. The number of subscribers attributable to MTN is substantially higher than Telkom’s (the third largest mobile operator).

    No country for new entrants

    Vodacom and MTN were able to benefit from regulatory support during the early years, but this support has not been forthcoming to later entrants.

    All the while, the termination-rate regime continues to favour the two largest operators, who continue to benefit from higher mobile termination rates compared to fixed termination rates. This despite their size and the fact that Telkom’s termination rate out-payments subsidised their entry and continue to benefit these giants. We gave them a helping hand up, so to speak.

    On the mobile broadband front, there has been little regulatory support for newer entrants, like Telkom, to compete on equivalent terms. This is despite Telkom’s attempts to disrupt the market with lower prices and better value propositions. Rather, through a lack of regulatory intervention, the duopoly structure has persisted, with Vodacom and MTN continuing to dominate the mobile-services market. Cell C has yet to turn a profit after 20 years in the market, posting an improved loss this year of R5-billion. Capitalists should be weeping!

    Remember the data services market inquiry?

    Data costs remain high in comparison to many other, less-developed markets in Africa.

    Vodacom and MTN have been able to ignore Telkom’s aggressive mobile data prices for years. This took place for so long that the Competition Commission eventually forced them to reduce retail prices through settlement agreements following its data services market inquiry.

    It pointed out that “the fact that the challenger networks hold a much higher share of actual data traffic relative to their share of data revenue indicates that revenue per gigabyte for the dominant two networks is considerably higher than that of the challenger networks”. This is despite the economies of scale and regulatory interventions that advantaged Vodacom and MTN. If that doesn’t define “duopoly”, we don’t know what does.

    The inquiry revealed that the prices and margins of Vodacom and MTN in South Africa were higher than in other countries in which they operate – a clear indication of market failure.

    Evidence of domination

    Both the Competition Commission and Icasa found, in their inquiries, that Vodacom and MTN are dominant across the supply chain. Their dominance is even more entrenched by the spectrum-sharing deals that they have entered into with Cell C, Liquid Intelligent Technologies and Rain. Cell C is wholly reliant on MTN and Vodacom to provide mobile services, and Liquid and Rain are disincentivised from competing aggressively in the mobile market due to the lucrative deals they have struck to provide capacity to either Vodacom or MTN, or both. This has limited their ability to compete independently – leaving Telkom as the only entity in the position to be able to challenge the “cosy” market structure head-on.

    Not all spectrum frequency is equal

    The point is often made that Telkom has the largest spectrum allocation in the market. That is true. However, not all spectrum frequencies are as efficient for mobile purposes. Having a greater share of inferior spectrum is not an advantage.

    The problem is then compounded by communications regulator Icasa wanting Telkom to bid on the sub-1GHz spectrum currently being utilised by e.tv and SABC for their broadcasts. It effectively amounts to buying something you cannot use – at least not for a very long time.

    Pushing the boundaries of regulation is a slippery slope

    The regulator also needs to consider that Vodacom and MTN have circumvented the ban on spectrum trading through their deals with Rain, Liquid and Cell C. They have thus effectively gained access to significant amounts of spectrum without having to face the necessary regulatory scrutiny. Without any analysis of the impact of these deals on competition and regulatory intervention, the market will continue to be dominated by Vodacom and MTN, which have a history of charging above competitive mobile prices.

    McLeod suggests that Telkom should by now have “pushing the legal and regulatory envelope” in a similar manner to MTN and Vodacom. It is a sad day for the market when “pushing the envelope” is required to remain competitive. Capitalists should be concerned.

    Pro-competitive spectrum licensing would be the first step in the right direction, but Icasa must not stop there. It needs to level the playing field across the board by addressing the market failures in the wholesale markets that it has itself identified in its mobile broadband services inquiry. It can only do this by introducing appropriate and effective regulation.

    • Liza Zouabi is executive for competition regulation and group pricing at Telkom

    Now read: Telkom is wrong – there is no market failure in mobile

    Cell C Competition Commission e.tv Icasa Liza Zouabi MTN SABC Telkom top Vodacom
    Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn WhatsApp Telegram Email
    Previous Article‘Pathetic!’: JSE gets a tongue-lashing over downtime
    Next Article In pictures | Teraco completes massive new data centre

    Related Posts

    Consortium makes unsolicited bid for state’s 40% stake in Telkom

    12 August 2022

    Actually, solar users should pay more to access the grid – here’s why

    12 August 2022

    Fixing SA’s power crisis is not complex: it simply takes the will to do better

    12 August 2022
    Add A Comment

    Comments are closed.

    Promoted

    Pricing Beyond CMYK: printers answer the FAQs

    11 August 2022

    How secure is your cloud?

    10 August 2022

    5 ways to make attack-path management more manageable

    10 August 2022
    Opinion

    No reason South Africa should have a shortage of electricity: Ramaphosa

    11 July 2022

    Ntshavheni’s bias against the private sector

    8 July 2022

    South Africa can no longer rely on Eskom alone

    4 July 2022

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the best South African technology news and analysis delivered to your e-mail inbox every morning.

    © 2009 - 2022 NewsCentral Media

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.