TechCentralTechCentral
    Facebook Twitter YouTube LinkedIn
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn YouTube
    TechCentralTechCentral
    NEWSLETTER
    • News

      MTN hires outgoing Icasa CEO Willington Ngwepe into top role

      16 August 2022

      Rain in embarrassing climbdown over Telkom statement

      16 August 2022

      Jo’burg to issue RFP for 500MW of electricity ‘within weeks’

      16 August 2022

      Load shedding returns, and may last until Thursday

      16 August 2022

      Coal miner Seriti plans R12-billion Mpumalanga wind farm

      16 August 2022
    • World

      Semiconductor boom turns to bust

      16 August 2022

      Tencent plans to offload R400-billion Meituan stake: sources

      16 August 2022

      Ether leaps higher on verge of Merge

      16 August 2022

      Institutions eye crypto but retail investors remain nervous

      15 August 2022

      Tencent woes mount, even after $560-billion selloff

      12 August 2022
    • In-depth

      African unicorn Flutterwave battles fires on multiple fronts

      11 August 2022

      The length of Earth’s days has been increasing – and no one knows why

      7 August 2022

      As Facebook fades, the Mad Men of advertising stage a comeback

      2 August 2022

      Crypto breaks the rules. That’s the point

      27 July 2022

      E-mail scams are getting chillingly personal

      17 July 2022
    • Podcasts

      Qush on infosec: why prevention is always better than cure

      11 August 2022

      e4’s Adri Führi on encouraging more women into tech careers

      10 August 2022

      How South Africa can woo more women into tech

      4 August 2022

      Book and check-in via WhatsApp? FlySafair is on it

      28 July 2022

      Interview: Why Dell’s next-gen PowerEdge servers change the game

      28 July 2022
    • Opinion

      No reason South Africa should have a shortage of electricity: Ramaphosa

      11 July 2022

      Ntshavheni’s bias against the private sector

      8 July 2022

      South Africa can no longer rely on Eskom alone

      4 July 2022

      Has South Africa’s advertising industry lost its way?

      21 June 2022

      Rob Lith: What Icasa’s spectrum auction means for SA companies

      13 June 2022
    • Company Hubs
      • 1-grid
      • Africa Data Centres
      • Altron Document Solutions
      • Amplitude
      • Atvance Intellect
      • Axiz
      • BOATech
      • CallMiner
      • Digital Generation
      • E4
      • ESET
      • Euphoria Telecom
      • IBM
      • Kyocera Document Solutions
      • Microsoft
      • Nutanix
      • One Trust
      • Pinnacle
      • Skybox Security
      • SkyWire
      • Tarsus on Demand
      • Videri Digital
      • Zendesk
    • Sections
      • Banking
      • Broadcasting and Media
      • Cloud computing
      • Consumer electronics
      • Cryptocurrencies
      • Education and skills
      • Energy
      • Fintech
      • Information security
      • Internet and connectivity
      • Internet of Things
      • Investment
      • IT services
      • Motoring and transport
      • Public sector
      • Science
      • Social media
      • Talent and leadership
      • Telecoms
    • Advertise
    TechCentralTechCentral
    Home»News»More opposition to cybercrimes bill

    More opposition to cybercrimes bill

    News By Agency Staff3 December 2015
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn WhatsApp Telegram Email

    crime-640

    The new cybercrimes bill is flawed, too broad and brings the country one step closer to the securitisation of the Internet, the Right2Know Campaign (R2K) has said.

    It was basically the secrecy bill of the Internet as it stood now and handed the keys of the Internet to the state security ministry, R2K said.

    Public comments on the draft cybercrimes and cybersecurity bill, which was gazetted earlier this year by the justice department, closed on Monday, 30 November and, so far, it has not been well received.

    The bill seeks to create offences and impose penalties on cybercrime.

    It also seeks to impose obligations on electronic communication service providers regarding aspects which may have an impact on cybersecurity.

    R2K media freedom and diversity organiser Micah Reddy said on Thursday that the bill was too broad in its current form and that a lot of it undermined privacy.

    Should it come into law, it would also be bad news for investigative journalists as it not only penalised those who leaked classified documents, but also those in possession of them, he said.

    In their submission to the department against the bill, the group said penalties ranged from a maximum of five to 15 years in jail, depending on whether the information was classified confidential, secret or top secret.

    “There is no public interest defence and no whistleblower protection. Even the limited and flawed exemptions contained in the protection of state information bill are missing.

    “Effectively, even more so than the secrecy bill, the draft cybercrimes bill cannot tell the difference between an act of espionage and an act of journalism.”

    The rights group this week said they believed the bill was fatally flawed and should be scrapped it its entirety.

    Under the bill, creating, selling, purchasing, possessing or using malware for the purposes of causing damage to data would be illegal.

    The possession of unauthorised passwords would also be illegal.

    In their submission against the draft bill, R2K said it created a regime that was so broad and overarching that almost all possible crimes that could exist on the Internet were dealt with by using the same set of tools.

    “From the risk of terrorist cyberattacks to the imagined crimes of an ordinary Facebook or BBM user. In attempting to police practically all of the Internet, the bill hands wide-ranging powers to state-security structures to secure vast parts of the Internet as assets of state security, rather than common spaces for the good of all.

    R2K said the bill also put in place new offences which were open to abuse.

    “These would criminalise a range of lawful activities and place dangerous penalties on freedom of expression and access to information, while also giving the state new invasive surveillance powers, with little protection for ordinary people’s privacy.”

    In September, the Electronic Frontier Foundation also raised concerns about a clause in the bill that would essentially criminalise any infringement of copyright.

    This would carry a penalty of up to three years in jail.

    “The drafters of this South African bill need to take it down a notch. The right place for copyright enforcement measures is not in cybercrime law, it’s in the copyright law — which is already under review,” the group said.  — News24

    Micah Reddy R2K Right2Know Right2Know Campaign
    Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn WhatsApp Telegram Email
    Previous ArticleHuge jump in cyber attacks on SA
    Next Article 5 reasons why e-tolls flopped

    Related Posts

    MTN hires outgoing Icasa CEO Willington Ngwepe into top role

    16 August 2022

    Rain in embarrassing climbdown over Telkom statement

    16 August 2022

    Jo’burg to issue RFP for 500MW of electricity ‘within weeks’

    16 August 2022
    Add A Comment

    Comments are closed.

    Promoted

    HPE SimpliVity: addressing SMBs’ data conundrums

    16 August 2022

    Digital transformation – don’t get caught unprepared

    16 August 2022

    Seven reasons your business needs IP surveillance cameras

    15 August 2022
    Opinion

    No reason South Africa should have a shortage of electricity: Ramaphosa

    11 July 2022

    Ntshavheni’s bias against the private sector

    8 July 2022

    South Africa can no longer rely on Eskom alone

    4 July 2022

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the best South African technology news and analysis delivered to your e-mail inbox every morning.

    © 2009 - 2022 NewsCentral Media

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.