Close Menu
TechCentralTechCentral

    Subscribe to the newsletter

    Get the best South African technology news and analysis delivered to your e-mail inbox every morning.

    Facebook X (Twitter) YouTube LinkedIn
    WhatsApp Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn YouTube
    TechCentralTechCentral
    • News

      War of words erupts over home affairs database fee hike

      24 June 2025

      Don’t expect Starlink in South Africa anytime soon

      24 June 2025

      Finally! Tribunal unpacks why it blocked Vodacom’s Vumatel deal

      24 June 2025

      Samsung to unveil new folding phones at July event

      24 June 2025

      Capital Appreciation banks on payments to offset software slump

      24 June 2025
    • World

      Mira Murati’s Thinking Machines hits $10-billion valuation

      24 June 2025

      Watch | Starship rocket explodes in setback to Musk’s Mars mission

      19 June 2025

      Trump Mobile dials into politics, profit and patriarchy

      17 June 2025

      Samsung plots health data hub to link users and doctors in real time

      17 June 2025

      Beijing’s chip champions blacklisted by Taiwan

      16 June 2025
    • In-depth

      Meta bets $72-billion on AI – and investors love it

      17 June 2025

      MultiChoice may unbundle SuperSport from DStv

      12 June 2025

      Grok promised bias-free chat. Then came the edits

      2 June 2025

      Digital fortress: We go inside JB5, Teraco’s giant new AI-ready data centre

      30 May 2025

      Sam Altman and Jony Ive’s big bet to out-Apple Apple

      22 May 2025
    • TCS

      TechCentral Nexus S0E3: Behind Takealot’s revenue surge

      23 June 2025

      TCS | South Africa’s Sociable wants to make social media social again

      23 June 2025

      TCS+ | AfriGIS’s Helen Hulett on how tech can help resolve South Africa’s water crisis

      18 June 2025

      TechCentral Nexus S0E2: South Africa’s digital battlefield

      16 June 2025

      TechCentral Nexus S0E1: Starlink, BEE and a new leader at Vodacom

      8 June 2025
    • Opinion

      South Africa pioneered drone laws a decade ago – now it must catch up

      17 June 2025

      AI and the future of ICT distribution

      16 June 2025

      Singapore soared – why can’t we? Lessons South Africa refuses to learn

      13 June 2025

      South Africa risks being left behind as stablecoins reshape global finance

      6 June 2025

      Beyond the box: why IT distribution depends on real partnerships

      2 June 2025
    • Company Hubs
      • Africa Data Centres
      • AfriGIS
      • Altron Digital Business
      • Altron Document Solutions
      • Altron Group
      • Arctic Wolf
      • AvertITD
      • Braintree
      • CallMiner
      • CambriLearn
      • CYBER1 Solutions
      • Digicloud Africa
      • Digimune
      • Domains.co.za
      • ESET
      • Euphoria Telecom
      • Incredible Business
      • iONLINE
      • Iris Network Systems
      • LSD Open
      • NEC XON
      • Network Platforms
      • Next DLP
      • Ovations
      • Paracon
      • Paratus
      • Q-KON
      • SevenC
      • SkyWire
      • Solid8 Technologies
      • Telit Cinterion
      • Tenable
      • Vertiv
      • Videri Digital
      • Wipro
      • Workday
    • Sections
      • AI and machine learning
      • Banking
      • Broadcasting and Media
      • Cloud services
      • Contact centres and CX
      • Cryptocurrencies
      • Education and skills
      • Electronics and hardware
      • Energy and sustainability
      • Enterprise software
      • Fintech
      • Information security
      • Internet and connectivity
      • Internet of Things
      • Investment
      • IT services
      • Lifestyle
      • Motoring
      • Public sector
      • Retail and e-commerce
      • Science
      • SMEs and start-ups
      • Social media
      • Talent and leadership
      • Telecoms
    • Events
    • Advertise
    TechCentralTechCentral
    Home » In-depth » Naspers’s insurance plan: Prosus

    Naspers’s insurance plan: Prosus

    By Ann Crotty28 September 2020
    Twitter LinkedIn Facebook WhatsApp Email Telegram Copy Link
    News Alerts
    WhatsApp

    In recent weeks, the Prosus team has been working hard to persuade anyone with the time to listen that there was a compelling reason for it to be hived out of Naspers and listed separately on the Amsterdam Stock Exchange.

    It’s likely that awarding a really generous remuneration package to the team members and their expensive hangers-on was only part of that reason.

    The main reason was to reduce the hefty discount between Naspers/Prosus and Tencent; this, so the story goes, would be achieved by Prosus building up its own attractive portfolio of businesses.

    A year is obviously too short a period to determine whether or not the strategy will be successful, but the signs aren’t encouraging

    A year is obviously too short a period to determine whether or not the strategy will be successful, but the signs aren’t encouraging. Prosus has failed to secure two eye-poppingly expensive acquisitions (even more expensive now), and the discount has grown.

    The grim reality for one-year-old Prosus is that, on the basis of all we know, there is little to no chance its leadership team – no matter how much it’s paid – will weld together a collection of Internet-based investments that could match what is being welded together by Tencent. Even if a lot of the estimated 700-plus companies Tencent has invested in fail, there is still considerable scope for continued great success. And it would be a level of success several times more impressive than the most successful scenario Prosus could hope for.

    Global metaverse

    Tencent is at the very centre of the global metaverse; Prosus is on the edge trying to pick up scraps.

    No matter how fast the Prosus team runs to chase down the discount, the Tencent team will be running considerably faster driving it up.Being the Internet, there might of course be some totally unseen and currently unseeable scenario that could p

    lay out in the coming years and make it all worthwhile for Prosus and its shareholders. But without being able to see that, it does seem that right now the best explanation for the existence of Prosus is as a form of insurance.

    It is insurance against the world as we know it being upended. Insurance against President Xi Jinping deciding one day that China does not need the rest of the world that much after all and opting to challenge the ownership of 31% of one of the country’s most important national champions. That’s the stake that currently rests with Prosus.

    China’s Xi Jinping

    That might sound more like a President Donald Trump manoeuvre than something the more grounded Xi would contemplate, but the Chinese president – a noted nationalist – seems increasingly willing to incur the ire of international leaders and pursue what he perceives are his country’s own interests at any cost.

    Xi’s inclination to take a tougher stance in the global economy is currently evident in Beijing’s growing use of what was described in a recent Financial Times column as a policy of “coercive commercial diplomacy”. This sees Beijing blocking imports ostensibly because of safety or other concerns, from a country that has displeased Beijing or as a warning not to challenge China’s politics particularly on the Uighurs, Tibet or Hong Kong. Germany, Australia, Canada, Philippines, Japan, Sweden, the UK and Mongolia are some of the countries on the receiving end of China’s coercive commercial diplomacy.

    It is, of course, not the first time a powerful economic player has flexed its muscles to secure its interests – that is the story of colonialism as well as a feature of the dominance of the US throughout the 20th century.

    Trump’s combative approach on Huawei and TikTok is a reminder to China of the scope of tit-for-tat diplomacy

    Indeed, Trump’s combative approach on Huawei and TikTok – an approach expected to be continued even under a Democratic presidency – is a reminder to China of the scope of tit-for-tat diplomacy.

    So, back to Naspers and the (so far) value-destroying creation of Prosus.

    The thing is, in a global environment of tense jingoism where enormously valuable hi-tech companies are prized assets, it is reasonable to want to create some insurance against someone grabbing one of those assets.

    Prized asset

    Tencent is one of the most valuable of those prized assets. It is the world leader in gaming and runs the largest messaging, social networking and mobile payments platform in China. As one analyst recently enthused: “In China, Tencent is like Facebook, Nintendo, Shopify, Netflix, Spotify, Slack and PayPal rolled into one. Its flagship product, WeChat, has 1.2 billion users and those users spend more time in the app every day than Americans spend on all social media combined.”

    In his “Not Boring” blog, analyst (and Tencent shareholder) Packy McCormick explains how Tencent turned the profits from its social networking, e-commerce and gaming cash cows into a global investment portfolio that includes many of the world’s most popular videogames, the fastest-growing Internet businesses in China, meaningful stakes in Tesla, Spotify and Snap, as well as a portfolio of international start-up unicorns second only to Sequoia’s. Tencent has proved to be a world-class capital allocator.

    While McCormick is, like most analysts, excited about Tencent’s current dominance, it is Tencent’s future that thrills him to hyperbolic levels.

    Naspers chairman Koos Bekker

    “Tencent is in the best position of any company to usher in and profit from the metaverse, the misunderstood and potentially mega-lucrative evolution of the Internet,” says McCormick. (According to one definition, the metaverse will be an “always-on, real-time world based on the Internet, in which an unlimited number of people can participate at the same time”.)

    “Tencent’s structure and strategy – providing capital and traffic – is the perfect model to profit from the decentralised, competitive, creator-friendly ecosystem that the metaverse is likely to be,” says McCormick.

    Even if you’re not as robustly enthusiastic about the metaverse as McCormick, even if the future is a very pale version of his metaverse, Tencent is in line to score big time. It has capital and, through its investments, it knows where the market is headed. It can buy into those markets, securing a strong and profitable foothold before competitors.

    Despite its valuable international investments, Tencent’s ability to exist and flourish relies on the goodwill of the Chinese government

    But here’s the thing: For how much longer will a jingoistic Chinese leadership, in an increasingly hostile global environment, be happy with “foreign” ownership of one of its national champions? Particularly one that is not only hugely valuable but is critical to the government’s ability to keep tabs on its 1.4 billion citizens?

    It is important to consider that despite its valuable international investments, Tencent’s ability to exist and flourish relies on the goodwill of the Chinese government. Building some sort of insurance against the possibility, no matter how remote, of China once again turning inwards seems like a reasonable strategy. If anything did happen to Tencent then Prosus would have an asset base that might provide some comfort to Naspers’s shareholders.

    Everyone needs insurance

    No doubt the present, extremely complex share ownership structure that exists between Naspers/Prosus and Tencent provides some comfort for Naspers/Prosus shareholders – more so given that it is controlled by South African-based private entities in which Koos Bekker is assumed to play a dominant role. Bekker is known to have had excellent relationships with senior Chinese officials over the decades. But he is of an age where insurance is advisable.

    It is, of course, all quite dramatic speculation and even four years ago might have seemed fanciful. But Trump, Covid-19 and an increasingly truculent Xi means there is no such thing as certainty in the world of business and politics. Everyone needs insurance.

    Still, it’s difficult to understand why they’re paying the puppets at Prosus so much to build a consolation insurance prize.

    • This article was originally published by Moneyweb and is used here with permission


    Donald Trump Huawei Koos Bekker Packy McCormick Prosus Tencent TikTok top Xi Jinping
    Subscribe to TechCentral Subscribe to TechCentral
    Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn WhatsApp Telegram Email Copy Link
    Previous ArticleUS ratchets up pressure on Germany to ban Huawei
    Next Article Alviva earnings cut in half but shares rally

    Related Posts

    Huawei Watch Fit 4 Series: beauty, brains and a battery that won’t quit

    24 June 2025

    Naspers shifts to an AI-first strategy – and it’s paying off

    23 June 2025

    TechCentral Nexus S0E3: Behind Takealot’s revenue surge

    23 June 2025
    Company News

    Communication costs exploding? Telviva has a fix for UK-SA teams

    24 June 2025

    Section 18A deductions and BEE points – a strategic choice for business compliance in 2025

    24 June 2025

    Huawei Watch Fit 4 Series: beauty, brains and a battery that won’t quit

    24 June 2025
    Opinion

    South Africa pioneered drone laws a decade ago – now it must catch up

    17 June 2025

    AI and the future of ICT distribution

    16 June 2025

    Singapore soared – why can’t we? Lessons South Africa refuses to learn

    13 June 2025

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the best South African technology news and analysis delivered to your e-mail inbox every morning.

    © 2009 - 2025 NewsCentral Media

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.