TechCentralTechCentral
    Facebook Twitter YouTube LinkedIn
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn YouTube
    TechCentralTechCentral
    NEWSLETTER
    • News

      Load shedding returns, and may last until Thursday

      16 August 2022

      Jo’burg to issue RFP for 500MW of electricity ‘within weeks’

      16 August 2022

      MTN hires outgoing Icasa CEO Willington Ngwepe into top role

      16 August 2022

      Rain in embarrassing climbdown over Telkom statement

      16 August 2022

      Coal miner Seriti plans R12-billion Mpumalanga wind farm

      16 August 2022
    • World

      Semiconductor boom turns to bust

      16 August 2022

      Tencent plans to offload R400-billion Meituan stake: sources

      16 August 2022

      Ether leaps higher on verge of Merge

      16 August 2022

      Institutions eye crypto but retail investors remain nervous

      15 August 2022

      Tencent woes mount, even after $560-billion selloff

      12 August 2022
    • In-depth

      African unicorn Flutterwave battles fires on multiple fronts

      11 August 2022

      The length of Earth’s days has been increasing – and no one knows why

      7 August 2022

      As Facebook fades, the Mad Men of advertising stage a comeback

      2 August 2022

      Crypto breaks the rules. That’s the point

      27 July 2022

      E-mail scams are getting chillingly personal

      17 July 2022
    • Podcasts

      Qush on infosec: why prevention is always better than cure

      11 August 2022

      e4’s Adri Führi on encouraging more women into tech careers

      10 August 2022

      How South Africa can woo more women into tech

      4 August 2022

      Book and check-in via WhatsApp? FlySafair is on it

      28 July 2022

      Interview: Why Dell’s next-gen PowerEdge servers change the game

      28 July 2022
    • Opinion

      No reason South Africa should have a shortage of electricity: Ramaphosa

      11 July 2022

      Ntshavheni’s bias against the private sector

      8 July 2022

      South Africa can no longer rely on Eskom alone

      4 July 2022

      Has South Africa’s advertising industry lost its way?

      21 June 2022

      Rob Lith: What Icasa’s spectrum auction means for SA companies

      13 June 2022
    • Company Hubs
      • 1-grid
      • Africa Data Centres
      • Altron Document Solutions
      • Amplitude
      • Atvance Intellect
      • Axiz
      • BOATech
      • CallMiner
      • Digital Generation
      • E4
      • ESET
      • Euphoria Telecom
      • IBM
      • Kyocera Document Solutions
      • Microsoft
      • Nutanix
      • One Trust
      • Pinnacle
      • Skybox Security
      • SkyWire
      • Tarsus on Demand
      • Videri Digital
      • Zendesk
    • Sections
      • Banking
      • Broadcasting and Media
      • Cloud computing
      • Consumer electronics
      • Cryptocurrencies
      • Education and skills
      • Energy
      • Fintech
      • Information security
      • Internet and connectivity
      • Internet of Things
      • Investment
      • IT services
      • Motoring and transport
      • Public sector
      • Science
      • Social media
      • Talent and leadership
      • Telecoms
    • Advertise
    TechCentralTechCentral
    Home»In-depth»No, Internet companies, we did not consent to this

    No, Internet companies, we did not consent to this

    In-depth By Agency Staff8 October 2018
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn WhatsApp Telegram Email

    Shares of Google parent company Alphabet dipped on Monday after The Wall Street Journal reported the company discovered a way for outside companies to potentially tap into Google users’ digital information and decided not to tell the public about it. I have three immediate takeaways:

    1. This data privacy glitch is just like Facebook’s Cambridge Analytica scandal, except it isn’t;
    2. Google made the wrong decision; and
    3. Consumers still can’t make informed choices about safeguarding their digital information.

    First, the Google discovery concerned the company’s Google+ service, an ill-fated attempt to create a Facebook-like social network inside of Google. According to the Journal, Google discovered that for two to three years ending earlier in 2018, outside companies that could hook their apps into Google+ were able to access some information that friends of Google+ users intended to keep private, including their birth dates and profile photos.

    People absolutely do not agree to whatever arrangements those companies make with outside parties to pass along personal information or data

    Yes, this is similar to Facebook’s problem with Cambridge Analytica, which appeared to take advantage of loose Facebook rules to gather information on people’s Facebook friends without their overt approval. Google+ is not Facebook, however. The Journal said that in a test in late March, Google found that the software glitch potentially affected about 500 000 Google+ accounts. The company couldn’t determine whether any Google+ information had actually been accessed through this software bug.

    That’s a relatively small number of potentially affected people, particularly compared to the scale of Cambridge Analytica. Facebook said the academic working with the firm could have gathered information on up to 87 million people.

    But on to point number two: the relatively small scale of the Google+ security hole does not excuse Google’s actions. The company evaluated a set of circumstances, including the public outrage over the Cambridge Analytica scandal at Facebook, and chose not to tell the public about the flaw in Google+. The company did this in full knowledge of the blowback it would face if the Google+ privacy glitch was known, and that makes what Google did completely indefensible. If the company had disclosed the Google+ problem in March, it would have been a big deal but not a crisis. This cover-up, however, makes the Google+ digital security problem so much worse.

    A zillion scandals

    And last, I can’t believe I’m still writing this after a zillion scandals about digital information on the loose, but here I go. More than a decade into the era of prevalent social networks and smartphones, people still have no way to make informed choices about how to safely conduct their lives online.

    People may not know all the gory details, but when they choose to use Facebook, Google+, Twitter, WeChat, iPhones and other technology products or services, they generally understand that the companies might collect dossiers on what they read, who they chat with and where they go. But people absolutely do not agree to whatever arrangements those companies make with outside parties to pass along personal information or data. Full stop.

    The core of the problem exposed by Cambridge Analytica and Facebook’s relationship with hardware companies, by the reporting on Apple’s dealings with software developers, and by the Journal’s reporting on Gmail and now Google+ is that the public has no control. We have agreements with those tech companies, then those companies make agreements with other companies that permit them access to some information about us. This is not true consent from the public.

    Google might agree to let a random online shopping company scan what I’m typing into Gmail, but I did not agree. Nor did I agree to hand over information from my Facebook account to a quiz app that one of my Facebook friends downloaded. Yes, somewhere in the terms of service of Facebook, Google+ and the Apple App Store is legal language that allow those companies to share some information with partners for mostly benign reasons. But then we have to trust that Google, Facebook, Apple and others also make smart choices about the outside companies that can tap our information or that of friends — or that might break the tech companies’ rules in what information they access. The tech companies do not deserve this trust.

    There’s no quick fix here. Interconnected technologies are a foundation of the Internet age. There is no Uber, for example, unless Uber’s technology connects with Google Maps and iPhone location technology, for example. But the era of half-baked Internet consent cannot continue.  — By Shira Ovide, (c) 2018 Bloomberg LP

    Facebook Google top
    Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn WhatsApp Telegram Email
    Previous ArticleGoogle admits to security flaw it failed to disclose
    Next Article Analysis shows impact of MTN pulling plug on free Twitter

    Related Posts

    Load shedding returns, and may last until Thursday

    16 August 2022

    Jo’burg to issue RFP for 500MW of electricity ‘within weeks’

    16 August 2022

    MTN hires outgoing Icasa CEO Willington Ngwepe into top role

    16 August 2022
    Add A Comment

    Comments are closed.

    Promoted

    HPE SimpliVity: addressing SMBs’ data conundrums

    16 August 2022

    Digital transformation – don’t get caught unprepared

    16 August 2022

    Seven reasons your business needs IP surveillance cameras

    15 August 2022
    Opinion

    No reason South Africa should have a shortage of electricity: Ramaphosa

    11 July 2022

    Ntshavheni’s bias against the private sector

    8 July 2022

    South Africa can no longer rely on Eskom alone

    4 July 2022

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the best South African technology news and analysis delivered to your e-mail inbox every morning.

    © 2009 - 2022 NewsCentral Media

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.