TechCentralTechCentral
    Facebook Twitter YouTube LinkedIn
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn YouTube
    TechCentral TechCentral
    NEWSLETTER
    • News

      Data suggests South African start-up exit size shrinking

      7 July 2022

      France’s Canal+ takes MultiChoice stake to 20%

      7 July 2022

      Huge Group to acquire what was Virgin Mobile in South Africa

      6 July 2022

      TechCentral needs your feedback – 2022 reader survey now live

      6 July 2022

      Call for ‘energy emergency’ to end load shedding

      6 July 2022
    • World

      Clear signs of trouble ahead for the global tech industry

      7 July 2022

      Elon Musk had twins last year with Shivon Zilis, one of his top execs

      7 July 2022

      China accuses US of ‘technological terrorism’

      6 July 2022

      Apple devices to get ‘Lockdown Mode’ to fight spyware

      6 July 2022

      Scientists at Cern observe three ‘exotic’ new particles

      6 July 2022
    • In-depth

      The bonfire of the NFTs

      5 July 2022

      The NFT party is over

      30 June 2022

      The great crypto crash: the fallout, and what happens next

      22 June 2022

      Goodbye, Internet Explorer – you really won’t be missed

      19 June 2022

      Oracle’s database dominance threatened by rise of cloud-first rivals

      13 June 2022
    • Podcasts

      Demystifying the complexity of AI – fact vs fiction

      6 July 2022

      How your organisation can triage its information security risk

      22 June 2022

      Everything PC S01E06 – ‘Apple Silicon’

      15 June 2022

      The youth might just save us

      15 June 2022

      Everything PC S01E05 – ‘Nvidia: The Green Goblin’

      8 June 2022
    • Opinion

      South Africa can no longer rely on Eskom alone

      4 July 2022

      Has South Africa’s advertising industry lost its way?

      21 June 2022

      Rob Lith: What Icasa’s spectrum auction means for SA companies

      13 June 2022

      A proposed solution to crypto’s stablecoin problem

      19 May 2022

      From spectrum to roads, why fixing SA’s problems is an uphill battle

      19 April 2022
    • Company Hubs
      • 1-grid
      • Altron Document Solutions
      • Amplitude
      • Atvance Intellect
      • Axiz
      • BOATech
      • CallMiner
      • Digital Generation
      • E4
      • ESET
      • Euphoria Telecom
      • IBM
      • Kyocera Document Solutions
      • Microsoft
      • Nutanix
      • One Trust
      • Pinnacle
      • Skybox Security
      • SkyWire
      • Tarsus on Demand
      • Videri Digital
      • Zendesk
    • Sections
      • Banking
      • Broadcasting and Media
      • Cloud computing
      • Consumer electronics
      • Cryptocurrencies
      • Education and skills
      • Energy
      • Fintech
      • Information security
      • Internet and connectivity
      • Internet of Things
      • Investment
      • IT services
      • Motoring and transport
      • Public sector
      • Science
      • Social media
      • Talent and leadership
      • Telecoms
    • Advertise
    TechCentralTechCentral
    Home»News»Telkom’s wholesale broadband pricing under scrutiny

    Telkom’s wholesale broadband pricing under scrutiny

    News By Editor19 October 2011
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn WhatsApp Telegram Email
    Mike Brierley

    Details began to emerge this week of how Telkom allegedly used its dominant position in the broadband market to prevent its rivals from competing with it.

    This was during the Competition Tribunal’s hearing into Telkom, where the fixed-line operator stands accused of abusing its dominance by charging excessive prices, refusing access to an essential facility, and engaging in price discrimination thereby making its downstream rivals less competitive in the telecommunications market.

    If Telkom is found guilty in the hearing, it could face a penalty of as much as 10% of its 2003 turnover, which could be as much as R3,5bn.

    The Competition Commission’s first witness was Mike Brierley, the former CEO of MTN Network Solutions who is now a telecoms consultant.

    The Mail & Guardian understands that Brierley’s testimony will be key to the commission’s case but his testimony on Monday and early Tuesday was heavily focused on telecoms technology and the definitions of the various links that create a network.

    By Tuesday afternoon, however, Brierley had switched focus to how Telkom had abused its dominance.

    Brierley maintained that the way Telkom serviced its own clients was exactly the same way it serviced the value-added network service providers (Vans) and therefore Telkom should have billed the Vans in a similar way.

    Brierley used a series of slides to explain the way Telkom priced the services to itself and the Vans.

    Image credit: Mike Brierley

    The graphic (above) shows the customer’s premises from where data travels, the closest Telkom exchange where it arrives, the closest Telkom exchange to its final destination and then the Vans point of presence (Pop), where the Vans data flows in and out.

    The first area that Brierley focused on was Link 2 between Telkom Exchange A and Telkom Exchange B.

    According to Brierley, Telkom charged the Vans a different flat rate than it did its customers for Link 2 and then also charged the Vans a distance-related component, which it did not charge to its customers.

    Brierley said this distance charge was “significant” and made a huge difference in Vans’ ability to compete against Telkom.

    On Link 3 Telkom did not need to use that link because it could place its POP in the Telkom exchange but it would not allow the Vans to place their Pops in the exchange.

    Brierley also argued that Telkom charged the Vans for equipment that was not used in Link 3, but wouldn’t charge its customers for the same.

    Brierley argued that although Vans paid for the remote exchange equipment, Telkom was still billing the Vans’ customers for the last local lead that connected from Telkom Exchange B to the Vans Pop.

    “So the customers are paying for something the Vans have already paid for,” said Brierley.

    Excessive charges
    Brierley also provided evidence of how Telkom had been charging companies excessively to connect to Europe.

    Brierley said that in 2004, Telkom charged R4,8m for half an STM (fibre-optic) circuit to an exchange in London.

    However, this was only half the link to Europe, the other half was available at a price of R672 000 from British Telecom as an example.

    Brierley said that by April 2008, Telkom was charging 18% of the original price and by 2009 it was down to 7%.

    When Telkom’s advocate, Alfred Cockerell, began cross-examining Brierley on Tuesday, he tried to paint Brierley as having an “axe to grind” with Telkom due to his role as MTN Network Solutions CEO at the time of the complaint being lodged with the commission.

    Cockerell disputed Brierley’s contention about Telkom’s alleged anticompetitive pricing, taking him through his allegations step by step, and illustrating Telkom’s position on the allegations.

    The case dates back to 2002 when a complaint was lodged with the commission by 21 entities. These included the SA Vans Association, the Internet Service Providers’ Association and nineteen other Vans.

    By February 2004, the commission had completed its investigation and referred its case against Telkom to the tribunal. However, Telkom decided to challenge the commission’s jurisdiction in the supreme court of appeal, a legal move that resulted in a five-year delay to the tribunal hearing, but ultimately was lost by Telkom.

    Some subsequent legal challenges followed based on the commission’s decision to amends its papers, which have since been resolved and the case has finally reached the tribunal.

    The hearing has been set down to be heard until 28 October and will then resume between 1 and 9 December.  — Lloyd Gedye, Mail & Guardian

    • Visit the Mail & Guardian Online, the smart news source
    • Subscribe to our free daily newsletter
    • Follow us on Twitter or on Facebook
    Mike Brierley MTN Network Solutions Telkom
    Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn WhatsApp Telegram Email
    Previous ArticleFNB to offer discounted tablets, smartphones
    Next Article Telkom choked rival OmniLink, IS claims

    Related Posts

    Data suggests South African start-up exit size shrinking

    7 July 2022

    France’s Canal+ takes MultiChoice stake to 20%

    7 July 2022

    Huge Group to acquire what was Virgin Mobile in South Africa

    6 July 2022
    Add A Comment

    Comments are closed.

    Promoted

    Following its acquisition by Schwarz Group, XM Cyber buys Cyber Observer

    7 July 2022

    Hot Ink certifies and diversifies to maintain competitive printing edge

    5 July 2022

    Increased flexibility with Dell Precision Mobile Workstations

    5 July 2022
    Opinion

    South Africa can no longer rely on Eskom alone

    4 July 2022

    Has South Africa’s advertising industry lost its way?

    21 June 2022

    Rob Lith: What Icasa’s spectrum auction means for SA companies

    13 June 2022

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the best South African technology news and analysis delivered to your e-mail inbox every morning.

    © 2009 - 2022 NewsCentral Media

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.