Close Menu
TechCentralTechCentral

    Subscribe to the newsletter

    Get the best South African technology news and analysis delivered to your e-mail inbox every morning.

    Facebook X (Twitter) YouTube LinkedIn
    WhatsApp Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn YouTube
    TechCentralTechCentral
    • News

      Eskom targets 32GW green energy shift by 2040

      16 July 2025

      MTN Group appoints new chief enterprise officer

      16 July 2025

      Kruger Park’s white rhinos get a hi-tech lifeline

      16 July 2025

      South Africa loosens media ownership rules – but keeps one hand on the remote

      16 July 2025

      The real cost of a cashless economy

      16 July 2025
    • World

      Grok 4 arrives with bold claims and fresh controversy

      10 July 2025

      Samsung’s bet on folding phones faces major test

      10 July 2025

      Bitcoin pushes higher into record territory

      10 July 2025

      OpenAI to launch web browser in direct challenge to Google Chrome

      10 July 2025

      Cupertino vs Brussels: Apple challenges Big Tech crackdown

      7 July 2025
    • In-depth

      The 1940s visionary who imagined the Information Age

      14 July 2025

      MultiChoice is working on a wholesale overhaul of DStv

      10 July 2025

      Siemens is battling Big Tech for AI supremacy in factories

      24 June 2025

      The algorithm will sing now: why musicians should be worried about AI

      20 June 2025

      Meta bets $72-billion on AI – and investors love it

      17 June 2025
    • TCS

      TCS+ | Samsung unveils significant new safety feature for Galaxy A-series phones

      16 July 2025

      TCS+ | MVNX on the opportunities in South Africa’s booming MVNO market

      11 July 2025

      TCS | Connecting Saffas – Renier Lombard on The Lekker Network

      7 July 2025

      TechCentral Nexus S0E4: Takealot’s big Post Office jobs plan

      4 July 2025

      TCS | Tech, townships and tenacity: Spar’s plan to win with Spar2U

      3 July 2025
    • Opinion

      A smarter approach to digital transformation in ICT distribution

      15 July 2025

      In defence of equity alternatives for BEE

      30 June 2025

      E-commerce in ICT distribution: enabler or disruptor?

      30 June 2025

      South Africa pioneered drone laws a decade ago – now it must catch up

      17 June 2025

      AI and the future of ICT distribution

      16 June 2025
    • Company Hubs
      • Africa Data Centres
      • AfriGIS
      • Altron Digital Business
      • Altron Document Solutions
      • Altron Group
      • Arctic Wolf
      • AvertITD
      • Braintree
      • CallMiner
      • CambriLearn
      • CYBER1 Solutions
      • Digicloud Africa
      • Digimune
      • Domains.co.za
      • ESET
      • Euphoria Telecom
      • Incredible Business
      • iONLINE
      • Iris Network Systems
      • LSD Open
      • NEC XON
      • Network Platforms
      • Next DLP
      • Ovations
      • Paracon
      • Paratus
      • Q-KON
      • SevenC
      • SkyWire
      • Solid8 Technologies
      • Telit Cinterion
      • Tenable
      • Vertiv
      • Videri Digital
      • Wipro
      • Workday
    • Sections
      • AI and machine learning
      • Banking
      • Broadcasting and Media
      • Cloud services
      • Contact centres and CX
      • Cryptocurrencies
      • Education and skills
      • Electronics and hardware
      • Energy and sustainability
      • Enterprise software
      • Fintech
      • Information security
      • Internet and connectivity
      • Internet of Things
      • Investment
      • IT services
      • Lifestyle
      • Motoring
      • Public sector
      • Retail and e-commerce
      • Science
      • SMEs and start-ups
      • Social media
      • Talent and leadership
      • Telecoms
    • Events
    • Advertise
    TechCentralTechCentral
    Home » In-depth » Uber’s SA competitors cry foul

    Uber’s SA competitors cry foul

    By Lloyd Gedye15 February 2015
    Twitter LinkedIn Facebook WhatsApp Email Telegram Copy Link
    News Alerts
    WhatsApp

    uber-640

    The rise of taxi service Uber in South Africa has its competitors crying foul and alleging a number of violations of the law.

    These include allegations that the company may be flouting foreign exchange controls, is not paying VAT and is bypassing the regulation of taxi services by saying it is not a transport company.

    Uber claims it is a technology company that connects a consumer with a taxi driver, who acts as an independent contractor to Uber.

    This places the onus for all regulatory and income tax compliance on the driver of the cab, and not on Uber.

    This business model has resulted in some of Uber’s independent drivers in Cape Town having their cabs impounded because they did not have the proper operating licence.

    Uber Johannesburg’s MD, Alon Lits, says everything is above board and that the company complies with all applicable tax laws in South Africa.

    He adds that Uber pays the relevant tax in every territory it operates in, including corporate income tax, payroll tax, sales tax and VAT.

    Uber’s business model bypasses local regulatory controls, allowing it to operate fleets of taxis in cities around the world.

    The allegations it faces in South Africa are not new to the smartphone service. Wherever the multinational company opens shop it has been dogged by claims of tax avoidance and bypassing regulatory control as well as protests from existing taxi operators.

    Countries in this new digital world are realising that existing regulations and laws are not sufficient to deal with technology start-ups and are grappling with how to regulate new operators such as Uber.

    In South Africa, one of the key allegations is that all cab fares are paid directly to a company based in the Netherlands, a known tax haven, with 80% of the fare being repatriated to South Africa to pay the drivers of the cabs.

    Questions have been raised over its business model including whether South Africa is losing out on valuable tax revenue.

    A number of tax experts said it was impossible to say whether Uber was in contravention of South African tax laws without taking a close look at its contracts with the independent taxi drivers.

    Grant McGlashan, the MD of iMobilise Transportation Systems, a company that provides a point-of-sale system that allows taxi drivers to take card payments and operators to manage their fleets of taxis, calls the competition between Uber and the taxi companies in South Africa a “David versus Goliath” story.

    He argues that Uber’s business model means there is not a level playing field for the taxi sector.

    The Metered Taxi Council of the Western Cape, which represents between 2 500 and 3 000 metered taxi drivers, has called for Uber to be shut down and has staged protests against the company.

    VAT exempt or not
    McGlashan says that Uber’s attempt to classify itself as a technology company rather than a transport company was disingenuous because the Uber app has merely replaced the call centre that most taxi companies operate.

    In Johannesburg, Uber contractors operate using charter services licences, which allow prices to be preset ahead of the journey.

    McGlashan has queried this: “This is interesting as charter services are those where a vehicle and driver is hired for a journey at a charge arranged beforehand with the operator.”

    He argues that Uber does not provide a charge upfront, only an estimate.

    Lits says each city in South Africa has different interpretations of the National Land Transportation Act. This is why Uber uses different licences in Cape Town and Johannesburg.

    He says the company is in discussions with the City of Cape Town to resolve the issues linked to the impounding of cabs.

    McGlashan says he has queried the fact that all fares from South Africa are paid to a company based in the Netherlands and has asked the South African Reserve Bank to investigate whether this was a violation of South Africa’s foreign exchange regulations.

    The Mail & Guardian has seen correspondence from the Reserve Bank stating that it is investigating McGlashan’s query.

    When the M&G contacted the Reserve Bank for comment this week it did not respond.

    McGlashan says that because Uber argues it is not a transport company, the fares it charges should be subject to VAT.

    In South Africa, all fare-paying transportation services are exempt from VAT.

    South African Revenue Service spokesperson Adrian Lackay says Sars cannot comment on Uber’s tax compliance because it is legally prevented from doing so.

    Lackay says that if a company does not qualify for the VAT exemption related to public transportation then it would have to pay VAT and would have to stipulate on each bill to a customer what the VAT portion of the bill was.

    Uber bills
    Lits says Uber does not need to charge VAT because it issues the bill for the taxi ride on behalf of the independent taxi driver and processes the payment on their behalf too.

    Lits sent the M&G an Uber bill to illustrate that it states at the bottom the name of the driver and that the bill was issued on behalf of that driver.

    But a separate Uber bill the M&G has in its possession does not state this. Lits could not explain this difference.

    McGlashan also raised concerns that some of Uber’s contracted drivers and vehicles don’t have operating permits and licences to operate, saying this could have implications for a passenger’s life cover or medical aid benefits if they were to be injured in an accident.

    Discovery medical aid insisted that in both cases the policies would pay out.

    In a written response to the M&G, Uber says it is a “technology company connecting riders to drivers in the area”.

    “Uber is bringing economic opportunity to thousands of independent local business owners, who would traditionally have been salaried employees working long hours with little flexibility or freedom.

    “Partner drivers keep a majority of the fare, with Uber’s fee being far lower than competitors,” according to the Uber letter.

    “Uber complies with all applicable tax laws, and pays the relevant tax in every territory it operates in. This includes corporate income tax, payroll tax, sales and use tax, and VAT.

    “Uber’s system is also completely cashless, bringing transparency and traceability to an industry that is typically almost entirely cash based, and where there are often concerns of underreporting for tax purposes.”  — (c) 2015 Mail & Guardian

    • Visit the Mail & Guardian Online, the smart news source


    Alon Lits Grant McGlashan iMobilise Transportation Systems Uber
    Subscribe to TechCentral Subscribe to TechCentral
    Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn WhatsApp Telegram Email Copy Link
    Previous ArticleMedia head to court over signal jamming
    Next Article Streaming could be the rival DStv needs

    Related Posts

    South African law is failing gig-economy workers

    12 June 2025

    ‘Afrikaans Uber’ sparks controversy

    27 January 2025

    Uber bakkie service launched in South Africa

    5 December 2024
    Company News

    Ransomware in South Africa: the human factor behind the growing crisis

    16 July 2025

    Mental wellness at scale: how Mac fuels October Health’s mission

    15 July 2025

    Banking on LEO: Q-KON transforms financial services connectivity

    14 July 2025
    Opinion

    A smarter approach to digital transformation in ICT distribution

    15 July 2025

    In defence of equity alternatives for BEE

    30 June 2025

    E-commerce in ICT distribution: enabler or disruptor?

    30 June 2025

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the best South African technology news and analysis delivered to your e-mail inbox every morning.

    © 2009 - 2025 NewsCentral Media

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.