TechCentralTechCentral
    Facebook Twitter YouTube LinkedIn
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn YouTube
    TechCentralTechCentral
    NEWSLETTER
    • News

      Tiger Brands to go solar – to start with four manufacturing plants

      17 August 2022

      Google buys into African e-logistics firm Lori Systems

      17 August 2022

      A new normal is dividing the global chip industry

      17 August 2022

      MTN hires outgoing Icasa CEO Willington Ngwepe into top role

      16 August 2022

      Rain in embarrassing climbdown over Telkom statement

      16 August 2022
    • World

      Chip makers are flashing a big warning for the global economy

      17 August 2022

      Semiconductor boom turns to bust

      16 August 2022

      Tencent plans to offload R400-billion Meituan stake: sources

      16 August 2022

      Ether leaps higher on verge of Merge

      16 August 2022

      Institutions eye crypto but retail investors remain nervous

      15 August 2022
    • In-depth

      African unicorn Flutterwave battles fires on multiple fronts

      11 August 2022

      The length of Earth’s days has been increasing – and no one knows why

      7 August 2022

      As Facebook fades, the Mad Men of advertising stage a comeback

      2 August 2022

      Crypto breaks the rules. That’s the point

      27 July 2022

      E-mail scams are getting chillingly personal

      17 July 2022
    • Podcasts

      Qush on infosec: why prevention is always better than cure

      11 August 2022

      e4’s Adri Führi on encouraging more women into tech careers

      10 August 2022

      How South Africa can woo more women into tech

      4 August 2022

      Book and check-in via WhatsApp? FlySafair is on it

      28 July 2022

      Interview: Why Dell’s next-gen PowerEdge servers change the game

      28 July 2022
    • Opinion

      No reason South Africa should have a shortage of electricity: Ramaphosa

      11 July 2022

      Ntshavheni’s bias against the private sector

      8 July 2022

      South Africa can no longer rely on Eskom alone

      4 July 2022

      Has South Africa’s advertising industry lost its way?

      21 June 2022

      Rob Lith: What Icasa’s spectrum auction means for SA companies

      13 June 2022
    • Company Hubs
      • 1-grid
      • Africa Data Centres
      • Altron Document Solutions
      • Amplitude
      • Atvance Intellect
      • Axiz
      • BOATech
      • CallMiner
      • Digital Generation
      • E4
      • ESET
      • Euphoria Telecom
      • IBM
      • Kyocera Document Solutions
      • Microsoft
      • Nutanix
      • One Trust
      • Pinnacle
      • Skybox Security
      • SkyWire
      • Tarsus on Demand
      • Videri Digital
      • Zendesk
    • Sections
      • Banking
      • Broadcasting and Media
      • Cloud computing
      • Consumer electronics
      • Cryptocurrencies
      • Education and skills
      • Energy
      • Fintech
      • Information security
      • Internet and connectivity
      • Internet of Things
      • Investment
      • IT services
      • Motoring and transport
      • Public sector
      • Science
      • Social media
      • Talent and leadership
      • Telecoms
    • Advertise
    TechCentralTechCentral
    Home»In-depth»What if companies that profit from your data had to pay you?

    What if companies that profit from your data had to pay you?

    In-depth By The Conversation30 July 2018
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn WhatsApp Telegram Email

    When it comes to digital privacy, there are plenty of organisations making money out of using your data — Google and Facebook are just two examples. But what if you were the one making the money?

    What if those organisations profiting from your data had to pay you a share of that earning?

    This idea — raised in a recent article in Quartz — is gaining ground.

    American author and law professor Eric Posner says data creation is labour, pointing out that in the largest technology companies, the share of income going to labour is only about 5-15%.

    If you accept Eric Posner’s theory that data is labour, then companies that make money from marketing your data are essentially getting labour for free

    That’s way below the estimated 80% share that Walmart, for example, pays for labour.

    If you accept Posner’s theory that data is labour, then companies that make money from marketing your data are essentially getting labour for free. And it’s not only your personal data they exploit. It’s also the many hours of labour it takes to create social media content in the first place — and the hours we spend viewing and responding to the content made by others.

    Despite the personal data industry generating some US$200-billion in revenue every year, data brokers give little, if any, money back to the providers of this asset.

    Let’s take Facebook, for example. If we divide its revenue ($40.7-billion in 2017) by the number of monthly active users (2.2 billion), then each user is worth $18.53, or about R245, on average.

    You could think of this figure as the amount that your Facebook data is worth.

    Of course, this is a very simplistic calculation. Even without using your data to target you with ads, Facebook’s size means it could still make money from advertising — just like any other media outlet. But it’s the targeting that helps Facebook dominate the digital advertising market.

    Indeed, concerns about Facebook’s ability to continue to exploit personal data have likely contributed to Facebook’s recent drop in share price.

    Valuable data

    If you combine your Facebook data with the rest of your digital footprint, some estimate that an average US consumer could make up to $240/year. This amount could be much higher if you include other valuable data  such as your purchase history, location and financial information.

    So, our data could make us money.

    Market research companies have been paying people for their data for decades.

    Nowadays, YouTube pays creators for posts via AdSense. Opinion Outpost pays you for voicing your opinion. Swagbucks pays you to do everyday things on the Internet. And Small Business Knowledge Center even pays you for your junk mail.

    So, if some companies are already paying for personal data, why isn’t everyone paying for it? There are two main reasons for this.

    First, our data are dispersed, fragmented and inaccessible. People who use ad blockers, “do not track” tools and high privacy settings erode the quality of data that can be gathered about them. So, each company with which they interact has only a small portion of their data, which can lead to errors in targeted marketing.

    The holy grail of data integrity is when your data comes directly from you. This means it’s 100% accurate, comprehensive, and handed over with explicit consent.

    Second, unlike other possessions, it’s hard for individuals to trade data. If data can’t be easily sold at the owner’s will, it’s difficult to extract value from it.

    While still small, these start-ups represent a significant step in correcting the exploitation currently seen in personal data markets

    Companies such as the UK start-up digi.me allow users to upload and store their data in a single app where they have control over it.

    Others, such as the European Union-based Wibson, Singapore non-profit Ocean, and the US start-up Datacoup, promise users the ability to trade their data with interested parties for money or credit.

    This philosophy of placing power over data back in the hands of the people it belongs to is embodied in the concept of the “Internet of Me”.

    While still small, these start-ups represent a significant step in correcting the exploitation currently seen in personal data markets.

    More accurate data should allow for better targeted advertising, more accurate credit scoring, improved market research, important training of AI systems and even more personalised health care.

    Finally we might have fairer option when it comes to dealing with our digital data.The Conversation

    • Written by Vincent Mitchell, professor of marketing, University of Sydney
    • This article was originally published on The Conversation
    Facebook Google top Vincent Mitchell
    Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn WhatsApp Telegram Email
    Previous ArticleEOH unveils R1-billion BEE deal
    Next Article Investors seek clues on next iPhone models

    Related Posts

    Google buys into African e-logistics firm Lori Systems

    17 August 2022

    African unicorn Flutterwave battles fires on multiple fronts

    11 August 2022

    Google’s giant Equiano Internet cable has landed in South Africa

    8 August 2022
    Add A Comment

    Comments are closed.

    Promoted

    Acrobat Sign and Microsoft accelerate digital transformation

    17 August 2022

    HPE SimpliVity: addressing SMBs’ data conundrums

    16 August 2022

    Digital transformation – don’t get caught unprepared

    16 August 2022
    Opinion

    No reason South Africa should have a shortage of electricity: Ramaphosa

    11 July 2022

    Ntshavheni’s bias against the private sector

    8 July 2022

    South Africa can no longer rely on Eskom alone

    4 July 2022

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the best South African technology news and analysis delivered to your e-mail inbox every morning.

    © 2009 - 2022 NewsCentral Media

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.