Close Menu
TechCentralTechCentral

    Subscribe to the newsletter

    Get the best South African technology news and analysis delivered to your e-mail inbox every morning.

    Facebook X (Twitter) YouTube LinkedIn
    WhatsApp Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn YouTube
    TechCentralTechCentral
    • News

      MultiChoice may unbundle SuperSport from DStv

      12 June 2025

      South African law is failing gig-economy workers

      12 June 2025

      MultiChoice’s TV empire shrinks – but its ‘side hustles’ are holding strong

      12 June 2025

      MultiChoice is bleeding subscribers

      11 June 2025

      Watch | Lunga Siyo on Telkom’s big growth plans

      11 June 2025
    • World

      Qualcomm shows off new chip for AI smart glasses

      11 June 2025

      Trump tariffs to dim 2025 smartphone shipments

      4 June 2025

      Shrimp Jesus and the AI ad invasion

      4 June 2025

      Apple slams EU rules as ‘flawed and costly’ in major legal pushback

      2 June 2025

      Mark Zuckerberg has finally found a use for his metaverse

      30 May 2025
    • In-depth

      Grok promised bias-free chat. Then came the edits

      2 June 2025

      Digital fortress: We go inside JB5, Teraco’s giant new AI-ready data centre

      30 May 2025

      Sam Altman and Jony Ive’s big bet to out-Apple Apple

      22 May 2025

      South Africa unveils big state digital reform programme

      12 May 2025

      Is this the end of Google Search as we know it?

      12 May 2025
    • TCS

      TechCentral Nexus S0E1: Starlink, BEE and a new leader at Vodacom

      8 June 2025

      TCS+ | The future of mobile money, with MTN’s Kagiso Mothibi

      6 June 2025

      TCS+ | AI is more than hype: Workday execs unpack real human impact

      4 June 2025

      TCS | Sentiv, and the story behind the buyout of Altron Nexus

      3 June 2025

      TCS | Signal restored: Unpacking the Blue Label and Cell C turnaround

      28 May 2025
    • Opinion

      Beyond the box: why IT distribution depends on real partnerships

      2 June 2025

      South Africa’s next crisis? Being offline in an AI-driven world

      2 June 2025

      Digital giants boost South African news media – and get blamed for it

      29 May 2025

      Solar panic? The truth about SSEG, fines and municipal rules

      14 April 2025

      Data protection must be crypto industry’s top priority

      9 April 2025
    • Company Hubs
      • Africa Data Centres
      • AfriGIS
      • Altron Digital Business
      • Altron Document Solutions
      • Altron Group
      • Arctic Wolf
      • AvertITD
      • Braintree
      • CallMiner
      • CYBER1 Solutions
      • Digicloud Africa
      • Digimune
      • Domains.co.za
      • ESET
      • Euphoria Telecom
      • Incredible Business
      • iONLINE
      • Iris Network Systems
      • LSD Open
      • NEC XON
      • Network Platforms
      • Next DLP
      • Ovations
      • Paracon
      • Paratus
      • Q-KON
      • SkyWire
      • Solid8 Technologies
      • Telit Cinterion
      • Tenable
      • Vertiv
      • Videri Digital
      • Wipro
      • Workday
    • Sections
      • AI and machine learning
      • Banking
      • Broadcasting and Media
      • Cloud services
      • Contact centres and CX
      • Cryptocurrencies
      • Education and skills
      • Electronics and hardware
      • Energy and sustainability
      • Enterprise software
      • Fintech
      • Information security
      • Internet and connectivity
      • Internet of Things
      • Investment
      • IT services
      • Lifestyle
      • Motoring
      • Public sector
      • Retail and e-commerce
      • Science
      • SMEs and start-ups
      • Social media
      • Talent and leadership
      • Telecoms
    • Events
    • Advertise
    TechCentralTechCentral
    Home » Ahmore Burger-Smidt » What the law says about incitement on social media

    What the law says about incitement on social media

    By Ahmore Burger-Smidt16 July 2021
    Twitter LinkedIn Facebook WhatsApp Email Telegram Copy Link
    News Alerts
    WhatsApp
    The writer, Ahmore Buger-Smidt, argues that

    Just last month, President Cyril Ramaphosa assented to the Cybercrimes Bill to bring into law the Cybercrimes Act. The legislation creates offences which have a bearing on cybercrime, including the distribution or disclosure of data messages that are harmful. However, although it has been signed into law, it remains without a commencement date.

    In terms of the Cybercrimes Act, messages that threaten destruction to an individual’s person or property are criminal offences. Specifically, section 14 of the act provides that: “Any person who discloses, by means of an electronic communications service, a data message to a person, group of persons or the general public with the intention to incite (a) the causing of any damage to property belonging to; or (b) violence against, a person or a group of persons, is guilty of an offence.”

    As a society, we have noticed the recent spreading of malicious and harmful messages. The question should be asked – to what extent has this contributed to the current dissonance?

    As an example, in a series of posts dated 9 July, a Twitter account shared content which encouraged the then-imminent violent protest action with the hashtags #ShutdownSA and #FreeJacobZuma. One such post contains an image of a poster which reads as follows:

    We have to consider whether messages of this nature constitute incitement and, if so, incitement to do what?

    Platforms such as Twitter would constitute electronic communications services and the posts shared therein would constitute data messages in terms of the Cybercrimes Act. An additional question to be answered to satisfy the definitional elements of section 14 of the act is whether there is an intention to incite damage to property or violence against a person or groups of people.

    Case law

    In Economic Freedom Fighters and another vs minister of justice & correctional services and another (CCT201/19) (2020) ZACC 25, the constitutional court held that the test for incitement is whether speech or conduct incites another or others to commit serious offences either at common law or against a statute or statutory regulation. This raises the question of what is the meaning of “serious”. The constitutional court gave examples of crimes such as murder, rape, armed robbery, fraud and corruption, and further stated that other crimes which are deemed evil by their very nature would constitute serious offences. Schedules 1, 2 (parts II and III) and 5 to 8 of the Criminal Procedure Act may also provide further guidance in that they list offences that seem to qualify as serious. These include public violence and breaking and entering with intent to commit an offence, all of which we have seen in the recent unrest.

    Consequently, tweets reflecting messages as reflected above, could very likely be interpreted to fall within the ambit of section 14 of the Cybercrimes Act.

    Social turns antisocial

    Although legislation such as the Cybercrimes Act is not the answer to curing the root cause of the unrest, it can still serve to assist our security and policing cluster in effectively intercepting and, where necessary, prosecuting such offences. It can introduce various efficiencies in the investigation and prosecution of cybercrimes such as mandated cooperation with law enforcement by electronic communications service providers, the establishment of a designated “point of contact” (meant to be a special, cybercrime-dedicated structure within the police) and a requirement to train police members in aspects relating to the detection, prevention and investigation of cybercrime.

    With such measures, which enable increased human and operational capacity, individuals who are acting as the catalysts for ongoing violence and unrest can be traced and held to account for their actions. However, given the lack of a commencement date, the Cybercrimes Act remains an unavailable tool in the armoury of our law enforcement.

    Undoubtedly, when social media turns antisocial — in that it is misused to mobilise to commit acts of violence — we ought to be armoured with law to deal with it decisively.

    • Ahmore Burger-Smidt is director and head of data privacy and the cybercrime practice at Werksmans Attorneys

    Now read: An open letter to Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey



    Ahmore Burger-Smidt Cyril Ramaphosa top Twitter Werksmans Werksmans Attorneys
    Subscribe to TechCentral Subscribe to TechCentral
    Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn WhatsApp Telegram Email Copy Link
    Previous ArticleLooting anarchy: Massmart reveals 41 stores looted and trashed
    Next Article Huge Group forced to retract another Adapt IT video

    Related Posts

    Telecoms operators back BEE reforms – but warn against favouritism

    5 June 2025

    Starlink storm: BEE reforms fuel tensions in Ramaphosa’s GNU

    26 May 2025

    Sita says it welcomes SIU corruption probe

    26 May 2025
    Company News

    Building a cyber-resilient culture from the boardroom to the front lines

    12 June 2025

    How South Africa’s municipalities are finally getting smart

    12 June 2025

    Ransomware roulette: pay up or power through?

    11 June 2025
    Opinion

    Beyond the box: why IT distribution depends on real partnerships

    2 June 2025

    South Africa’s next crisis? Being offline in an AI-driven world

    2 June 2025

    Digital giants boost South African news media – and get blamed for it

    29 May 2025

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the best South African technology news and analysis delivered to your e-mail inbox every morning.

    © 2009 - 2025 NewsCentral Media

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.